You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: project.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ${{ content_uvp }} Good question! All the other images on the market that do exa
5
5
${{ github:> [!IMPORTANT] }}
6
6
${{ github:> }}* This image runs as 1000:1000 by default, most other images run everything as root
7
7
${{ github:> }}* This image has no shell since it is 100% distroless, most other images run on a distro like Debian or Alpine with full shell access (security)
8
-
${{ github:> }}* This image does not ship with any CVE and is automatically maintained via CI/CD, most other images mostly have no CVE scanning or code quality tools in place
8
+
${{ github:> }}* This image does not ship with any critical or high rated CVE and is automatically maintained via CI/CD, most other images mostly have no CVE scanning or code quality tools in place
9
9
${{ github:> }}* This image is created via a secure, pinned CI/CD process and immune to upstream attacks, most other images have upstream dependencies that can be exploited
10
10
${{ github:> }}* This image contains a patch to run rootless (Linux caps needed), most other images require higher caps
11
11
${{ github:> }}* This image contains a proper health check that verifies the app is actually working, most other images have either no health check or only check if a port is open or ping works
0 commit comments