FR : soname should be identical for better packaging

[asy972]

After the package is built, the following libraries are obtained (for 1.4.3 at this case):

usr/lib64:
libclamav.so.12 -> libclamav.so.12.0.3
libclamav.so.12.0.3
libclammspack.so.0 -> libclammspack.so.0.8.0
libclammspack.so.0.8.0
libclamunrar_iface.so.12 -> libclamunrar_iface.so.12.0.3
libclamunrar_iface.so.12.0.3
libclamunrar.so.12 -> libclamunrar.so.12.0.3
libclamunrar.so.12.0.3
libfreshclam.so.3 -> libfreshclam.so.3.0.2
libfreshclam.so.3.0.2

Some software in distributions is built with ClamAV libraries. However, not all software can be rebuilt at the same time, and it may be necessary to use software that is built with the old version of the library. It is not possible to put two "libclamav%soname" packages because some libraries have the same names if libclamav isn't splitted to more finely parts.

How would you like all libraries to have the same soname with libclamav.so?

[val-ms]

I don't know about this. I can see how it would make life easier though it feels less precise. If anything, it bothers me that the libclamunrar and libclamunrar_iface libraries do have the same version as libclamav.

I'm curious what our debian community package maintainers think. @sebastianas would you care to comment?