This issue continues from #3224 where we made the following improvements to mksurfdata_esmf:
- Included "no crop fire" (value 13) in the calculation of dominant abm (peak crop-fire month), rather than picking the dominant from range 1 to 12. The latter overestimated crop fire, while this improvement got too many 13s and underestimated crop fire.
- Included "invalid" (value 14 for ocean, determined from abm's LANDMASK) not to be included in the calculation of dominant, so as to get fewer dominant 13s along coastlines. Fang Li finds that we still get more 13s than she would like.
So now we propose that @lifang0209 change the abm raw data to 14 where the MODIS data shows crop 0%:
- The new abm raw data will range 1 to 13 in grid cells with crop > 0% and 14 in grid cells with crop = 0%. This will eliminate dominant 13s that came from non-agricultural areas before.
- We propose that @lifang0209 make the change using data directly from MODIS (rather than using clm's pct_crop which has many assumptions built into it).
- We acknowledge that the abm raw data was and will continue to be inconsistent with past and future crop distributions, but we have no good way around that currently.
Definition of DONE
@lifang0209 @samsrabin
I welcome comments and corrections
This issue continues from #3224 where we made the following improvements to mksurfdata_esmf:
So now we propose that @lifang0209 change the abm raw data to 14 where the MODIS data shows crop 0%:
Definition of DONE
tools/contribfor availability in the futurealpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7.04.ctsm5.3.063with Prepare to make ctsm54 datasets #3233 (expected)alpha-ctsm5.4.CMIP7.05.ctsm5.3.063with Urban mesh was pointing to a 3x3min instead of a 0.25x0.25 file #3347 (unexpected correction)@lifang0209 @samsrabin
I welcome comments and corrections