Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
It seems like these questions are more related to Ligand/ProteinMPNN than RFdiffusion. You will likely get more support and comments by posting this issue in the LigandMPNN or ProteinMPNN repositories.
|
|
It seems like these questions are more related to Ligand/ProteinMPNN than RFdiffusion. You will likely get more support and comments by posting this issue in the LigandMPNN or ProteinMPNN repositories.
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello authors,
I am working on a peptide-protein binding design project and am using a computational pipeline that involves RFdiffusion (for backbone generation) -> ProteinMPNN (for sequence design) -> AlphaFold2 (for structure prediction and validation).
I have two questions regarding the potential use of LigandMPNN to replace ProteinMPNN in this pipeline:
Replacing ProteinMPNN with LigandMPNN: Since my goal is to design a peptide that binds to a target protein, I understand that LigandMPNN is specifically designed for tasks with ligand context. Is replacing ProteinMPNN with LigandMPNN in this pipeline a recommended approach for generating high-quality protein-ligand sequences?
Error with
pack_side_chainsfeature: I encountered an error when running LigandMPNN with thepack_side_chainsfeature enabled. I noticed that this is an optional feature. Is it a mandatory feature for generating high-quality designs, or can I skip it and still get reliable sequences for subsequent experimental validation?Here is the error and the command I used:
Command:
**Traceback:**Thank you for your time and assistance!
All reactions