You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2026. It is now read-only.
Has anyone been able to reproduce anything around the mentioned 87% precision on sudoku-extreme?
There is apparently some confusion, at least for me. There are two kinds of sudoku-extreme datasets:
Now the paper mentions the "Sudoku Extreme" dataset having 1K examples, but the code in the repository actually uses "sudoku-extreme" and not "sudoku-extreme-1k"!
I'm training my own implementation of the paper on sudoku-extreme-1k and the max cell accuracy I can reach is around 40%.
So is it indeed 87% accuracy on sudoku-extreme-1k, or the author made a mistake and in fact trained the model on the large sudoku-extreme dataset, and achieved 87% on that?
Has anyone been able to reproduce anything around the mentioned 87% precision on sudoku-extreme?
There is apparently some confusion, at least for me. There are two kinds of sudoku-extreme datasets:
Now the paper mentions the "Sudoku Extreme" dataset having 1K examples, but the code in the repository actually uses "sudoku-extreme" and not "sudoku-extreme-1k"!
I'm training my own implementation of the paper on sudoku-extreme-1k and the max cell accuracy I can reach is around 40%.
So is it indeed 87% accuracy on sudoku-extreme-1k, or the author made a mistake and in fact trained the model on the large sudoku-extreme dataset, and achieved 87% on that?