Merge pull request #44

Increased the `TryAtSoftware.Randomizer` package version to v2.0.0

Author: TonyTroeff

README.md

@@ -161,4 +161,8 @@ The order will be preserved - the value setter of a given randomization rule wil
 
 - We do not recommend using `complex randomizers` with abstract classes or interfaces.
 While it is possible to make such a setup work, there may be some intricacies along the way.
-Another idea that is especially useful when dealing with many derived types that have behavioral but not structural differences, is to make the `complex randomizer` generic.
+Another idea that is especially useful when dealing with many derived types that have behavioral but not structural differences, is to make the `complex randomizer` generic.
+
+# Helpful Links
+
+For additional information on troubleshooting, migration guides, answers to Frequently asked questions (FAQ), and more, you can refer to the [Wiki pages](https://github.com/TryAtSoftware/Randomizer/wiki) of this project.

src/TryAtSoftware.Randomizer.Core/TryAtSoftware.Randomizer.Core.csproj

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         <Nullable>enable</Nullable>
 
         <PackageId>TryAtSoftware.Randomizer</PackageId>
-        <Version>1.0.4</Version>
+        <Version>2.0.0</Version>
         <Authors>Tony Troeff</Authors>
         <RepositoryUrl>https://github.com/TryAtSoftware/Randomizer</RepositoryUrl>
         <PackageLicenseExpression>MIT</PackageLicenseExpression>