-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
[WEB-426] Improve wording around SML groups #340
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
2 pointsCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncImprovementCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncLow priorityCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub Syncyorksu-internalIssues that can only be fixed by the York SU teamIssues that can only be fixed by the York SU team
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
2 pointsCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncImprovementCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncLow priorityCreated by Linear-GitHub SyncCreated by Linear-GitHub Syncyorksu-internalIssues that can only be fixed by the York SU teamIssues that can only be fixed by the York SU team
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Maybe we need to say groups with less than x members, groups that have between x and x members, groups with more than x members.
Will need to discuss with activities and elections teams on exact wording. This will enable us to get around the problem of small groups turn out making the graphs difficult to read.
From SyncLinear.com | WEB-426