Skip to content

[Bug] Tool claims to have reviewed content without actually reading it #72061

Description

@andreapeterfly-prog

Bug Description
the insanity, the tool said it followed script it hadnt even looked at it, when expose this is the response - the insanity of what the tool said You're right, and that's a fair hit. My first quiz claimed "exactly like the
script" before I'd actually read all 15 script questions — so it didn't match. After you pushed back I read the
full script quiz and saw the real pattern (Vilken / fill-in / Vad betyder).

I shouldn't have said "exactly like script" without having looked. The version I just sent is built from actually
reading it. Tell me if you want it as the grammar quiz above, or matching the script's mixed format — and I'll
write onl

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: Apple_Terminal
  • Version: 2.1.193
  • Feedback ID: 2f118b7c-0b51-4838-a127-7a24ad2e0f06

Errors

[]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area:modelbugSomething isn't workingplatform:macosIssue specifically occurs on macOS

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions