Process Development Community [2025-10-23] #1908
masc2023
started this conversation in
SW Dev Process Community
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Agenda:
Check participants and introduce new members
Align on Agenda for today
Standard Agenda:
Planning
Process Development (News, Updates, Improvements)
Safety Management and Execution (Safety Manager Roles required)
Quality Management and Execution (Quality Manager Roles required)
optional for the moment:
Security Management and Execution (Security Manager Roles required)
Topics:
Only ONE Working Slot, see here https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/516#discussioncomment-14726684
Shall we only use then https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/407 from now on?
#1929
#1624
Update on https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/1501
#1932
PR on platform AoU: #1931
#1920 and eclipse-score/process_description#208
Participants:
@aschemmel-tech
@PandaeDo
Paul Sherwood
@kroehnd
@pahmann
@PhilipPartsch
Karthik Vanka (Qorix)
@odra
@FScholPer
Meeting Minutes:
Decided to use only then https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/407 from now on for documenting all the SW Dev Meeting Minutes
Official S-CORE Pre-Release 0.5 (Feature Complete Release) planned for 11.11.2025, so Process Description Release for that will be done first week of November
Discussed: #1624, Removal of Technical Lead Role implies, that process descriptions must be re-worked to remove this role. So every process owner should consider that for the ongoing activities. @masc2023 will create tickets and/or add checkmark in the existing EPICS
#1931 will be discussed next Tuesday, 28.10.2025
Discussed status on implementation, further details to be discussed @PhilipPartsch, @hoe-jo
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions