Communication CFT Weekly [2025-11-03] #1949
LittleHuba
started this conversation in
Communication FT
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Participants
@LittleHuba
@darkwisebear
@arsibo
Haller Mike
Abhishek Goyal
@lurtz
@SebastianGrob
@JochenSatETAS
@ZoranCutura
@dasoho
Taenzer Michael
Mittag Andreas
@crimson11
Agenda
Meeting Minutes
Contributions for Architecture Workshop
#1571
Aumovio/Elektrobit
https://github.com/Elektrobit/inc_gateway
Qorix
eclipse-score/inc_someip_gateway#1
ETAS
Contribution is not yet published
Adaptations necessary for Release 0.5
IAM
Motivating discussion: eclipse-score/communication#74
No support to forbid a process from offering specific services
Restrict accessibility of service interface to only parts of the offered communication elements
Completion of functionality e.g. methods
https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/1948#discussioncomment-14855543
Feel free to comment in above discussion or open a new discussion in the module
Other feature gaps will be closed with v1.0
Other open features can be seen here: https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3Aft%3Acommunication
How do we handle feature modifications
Process documentation:
https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/process_areas/change_management/guidance/change_management_guideline.html#gd_guidl__change_change_request
https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/process_areas/change_management/change_management_getstrt.html#general-workflow
Basic steps (please verify in process documentation):
Search the existing feature request/component request
Open a PR on the this existing request
Describe your modification in the request (including background, use case)
In the PR description include further background that should not go into the request but helps with reviews
Request review on the PR from the codeowners
Codeowners will review PR and either request changes or approve or close
Once PR is merged, tickets will be created or call for contribution will be started to close the feature gap
Rust API meeting
Next meeting scheduled for next week
Agenda to be published by @darkwisebear
If interested, reach out to @darkwisebear via Slack or a comment below this discussion
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions