-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
feat: minimal tombstone integration #4933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: minimal tombstone integration #4933
Conversation
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/AndroidOptionsInitializer.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/AndroidOptionsInitializer.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@markushi, I just realized I cannot omit having a separate "tombstone" marker, even if I report all events, without repeating them. I mean, this was clear to me, but, in addition to it being a must for this PR already, unlike the ANR marker, I must also align it with I wonder if it would make the most sense to do it similarly to The biggest issue with that approach is that the The PR still makes sense for a first review from you (since, if the general direction makes sense and you have todos not in my list, I can also add a test for the integration itself). Still, I would appreciate a short sync on how to align these execution paths (maybe I don't need to align tombstones with I can convert the PR back to a draft if you prefer. |
markushi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a few comments - great work so far!
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/AndroidOptionsInitializer.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/proto/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/tombstone.proto
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| otel-semconv = { module = "io.opentelemetry.semconv:opentelemetry-semconv", version.ref = "otelSemanticConventions" } | ||
| otel-semconv-incubating = { module = "io.opentelemetry.semconv:opentelemetry-semconv-incubating", version.ref = "otelSemanticConventionsAlpha" } | ||
| p6spy = { module = "p6spy:p6spy", version = "3.9.1" } | ||
| protobuf-javalite = { module = "com.google.protobuf:protobuf-javalite", version.ref = "protobuf"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@romtsn Not sure if you followed the conversations, but as you can see here, protobuf requires a runtime dependency. It will have an impact of around 10kb. IMHO fine for now, we should still check how stable this library is to avoid and consumer version mismatch issues.
Co-authored-by: Markus Hintersteiner <[email protected]>
...ry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/internal/tombstone/TombstoneParser.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
… S, since that is the earliest version where `REASON_CRASH_NATIVE` provides tombstones via the `traceInputStream`)
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneIntegration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…rker This currently does not work: While we now can optionally enable reporting of "historical" tombstones, by making the `TombstoneHint` `Backfillable` it will automatically be enriched by the `ANRv2EventProcessor` which is currently the only `BackfillingEventProcessor`. The `ANRv2EventProcessor` is partially written in way that is potentially generic for events with `Backfillable` hints, but other parts are enriching as if those are always were ANRs, which up to now was true, but with Tombstones that assumption now breaks. Next Steps: * There is considerable duplication between the ANRv2Integration and TombstoneIntegration
| @NotNull private final BuildInfoProvider buildInfoProvider; | ||
|
|
||
| public TombstoneEventProcessor( | ||
| @NotNull Context context, | ||
| @NotNull SentryAndroidOptions options, | ||
| @NotNull BuildInfoProvider buildInfoProvider) { | ||
| this.context = context; | ||
| this.options = options; | ||
| this.buildInfoProvider = buildInfoProvider; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: AnrV2EventProcessor incorrectly processes tombstone events, overwriting signal data and misclassifying them as foreground ANRs due to TombstoneHint interface mismatch.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High
🔍 Detailed Analysis
The AnrV2EventProcessor incorrectly processes tombstone events, leading to loss of critical signal information and incorrect event classification. Because TombstoneHint does not implement the AbnormalExit interface, the isBackgroundAnr() method in AnrV2EventProcessor always returns false for tombstone events. This causes all tombstone events to be fingerprinted as 'foreground-anr' and to have their inForeground status set to true, regardless of their actual background status. Additionally, the AnrV2EventProcessor overwrites the signal-specific exception type and mechanism data carefully parsed by TombstoneParser with generic ANR data, discarding crucial native crash details.
💡 Suggested Fix
Modify AnrV2EventProcessor to check the type of the hint object before applying ANR-specific logic, or ensure TombstoneHint implements AbnormalExit and provides the necessary mechanism() method to correctly distinguish between ANR and tombstone events and their background status.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location:
sentry-android-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/android/core/TombstoneEventProcessor.java#L1-L26
Potential issue: The `AnrV2EventProcessor` incorrectly processes tombstone events,
leading to loss of critical signal information and incorrect event classification.
Because `TombstoneHint` does not implement the `AbnormalExit` interface, the
`isBackgroundAnr()` method in `AnrV2EventProcessor` always returns `false` for tombstone
events. This causes all tombstone events to be fingerprinted as 'foreground-anr' and to
have their `inForeground` status set to `true`, regardless of their actual background
status. Additionally, the `AnrV2EventProcessor` overwrites the signal-specific exception
type and mechanism data carefully parsed by `TombstoneParser` with generic ANR data,
discarding crucial native crash details.
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 4922118
| String.join(" ", tombstone.getCommandLineList()))); | ||
|
|
||
| return message; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Missing signal info check causes inconsistent event data
The constructMessage() method unconditionally accesses tombstone.getSignalInfo() at line 165 without checking hasSignalInfo() first. Meanwhile, createException() at line 121 does check hasSignalInfo() before accessing signal properties. If a tombstone lacks signal info, getSignalInfo() returns a default proto instance with empty strings and zeros, producing a confusing message like "Fatal signal (0), (0), pid = X ()" while the exception correctly omits signal-related fields. This inconsistency results in malformed event data.
📜 Description
As discussed last week with @markushi, the process will be to make minimal atomic changes in each PR and merge directly to
mainrather than accumulating on an uber feature branch. This allows for easier review/feedback/corrections, and we can already test a subset of the entire feature "in the field".The first minimal change is a basic tombstone integration:
sentry-android-core) or get two reports for the same crashApplicationExitInfoentries withREASON_CRASH_NATIVEor report them too, including the option for the latter; I left this out for minimal interface exposure in the first step, but either variant is easy to add to this PR or later)protobuf-javalite(the entire features adds ca. 75KiB to the Android sample release APK)protobufplugin and theprotoccompiler to automate protocol updatesOpen Issues:
protobufruntime is relatively small, there is still the possibility of conflicting with client-sideprotobufversions (major versions often introduce quite severe breakage, but I haven't tested this yet, only reviewed change logs).ANRv2)ManifestMetadataReaderto configure conveniently? (or not since the corresponding options are only internal?)💡 Motivation and Context
First sensible release step for #3295
Part of https://linear.app/getsentry/project/tombstone-support-android-0024cb6e3ffd/
💚 How did you test it?
📝 Checklist
sendDefaultPIIis enabled.🔮 Next steps
protobufruntime library as a dependency tosentry-android-core(or shade/relocate, or implement our own decoder, given that this is a stable format which only requires a subset ofprotobuf).EventProcessorthat merges crash events fromsentry-nativewith tombstones.#skip-changelog (for now)