You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
> The concentric rings show dependency direction — all arrows point inward.
26
+
> **Diagram Caption:**
27
+
> The concentric rings show dependency direction — all arrows point inward.
28
28
> The gray wedge is a *novel visualization of Cross-Cutting Concerns*, showing shared utilities like logging, config, and validation that affect every layer but depend on none.
29
29
30
30
---
31
31
32
32
## The Problem With “Getting Things Done”
33
33
Every developer knows this feeling.
34
34
35
-
You’re deep in a feature branch, the code is working, the tests are green, and everything feels like progress. Then the next sprint lands — and you need to change *just one thing*.
36
-
You open the files and realize:
35
+
You’re deep in a feature branch, the code is working, the tests are green, and everything feels like progress. Then the next sprint lands — and you need to change *just one thing*.
36
+
You open the files and realize:
37
37
38
-
- The web controller knows too much about the database.
39
-
- The domain object is importing HTTP classes.
40
-
- A business rule lives in a utility package called “helpers.”
38
+
- The web controller knows too much about the database.
39
+
- The domain object is importing HTTP classes.
40
+
- A business rule lives in a utility package called “helpers.”
41
41
- Changing a single endpoint means touching five different layers that somehow all depend on each other.
42
42
43
43
Suddenly, that working system feels more like a house of cards.
44
44
45
-
This is where **Clean Architecture** comes in — the antidote to tight coupling and creeping entropy.
45
+
This is where **Clean Architecture** comes in — the antidote to tight coupling and creeping entropy.
46
46
47
47
---
48
48
@@ -54,35 +54,49 @@ Originally popularized by **Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob)**, Clean Architecture f
54
54
55
55
> “Dependencies should always point inward — toward the core of your system.”
56
56
57
-
That simple idea changes everything.
57
+
That simple principle—**dependencies flow inward**—changes everything.
58
58
59
-
The innermost part of your application — the **business rules** — should know nothing about frameworks, databases, or user interfaces.
59
+
The innermost part of your application — the **business rules** — should know nothing about frameworks, databases, or user interfaces.
60
60
Conversely, the outermost part of your system — the controllers, databases, APIs — should depend on the inner rules, never the other way around.
61
61
62
-
This creates a *cone of stability*: as frameworks, tools, and technologies come and go, your business logic remains untouched.
62
+
> This creates a *cone of stability*: as frameworks, tools, and technologies come and go, your business logic remains untouched.
63
63
64
64
---
65
65
66
+
## 🧪 Testing Made Natural
66
67
67
-
### � **1. Domain Layer (Entities & Business Rules)**
68
+
Clean Architecture creates a testing paradise:
68
69
69
-
At the very center lies the beating heart of your application:
70
-
-**Entities** represent your core business concepts.
70
+
-**Domain Layer**: Pure unit tests. No mocks, no frameworks. Lightning fast.
71
+
-**Application Layer**: Test use cases by mocking repository/gateway interfaces.
72
+
-**Interface Adapters**: Test controllers with mocked use cases.
73
+
-**Integration Tests**: Test only the outer ring against real infrastructure.
74
+
75
+
> The dependency direction means you can test each layer in isolation, building confidence from the inside out.
76
+
77
+
---
78
+
79
+
### � Domain Layer (Entities & Business Rules)
80
+
81
+
At the very center lies the beating heart of your application:
82
+
-**Entities** represent your core business concepts.
71
83
-**Business Rules** define invariants and logic that must always hold true.
72
84
73
-
This layer contains **pure code** — no frameworks, no external references, no side effects.
85
+
This layer contains **pure code** — no frameworks, no external references, no side effects.
74
86
It’s what you would bring with you if the entire tech stack changed overnight.
75
87
76
-
Example:
88
+
Example:
77
89
If you’re building a billing system, your *Invoice*, *Customer*, and *PaymentPolicy* entities belong here.
78
90
79
-
They shouldn’t care if you store data in PostgreSQL or MongoDB.
80
-
They shouldn’t care if your API is REST, GraphQL, or gRPC.
91
+
They shouldn’t care if you store data in PostgreSQL or MongoDB.
92
+
They shouldn’t care if your API is REST, GraphQL, or gRPC.
81
93
They care only about business truth.
94
+
> "A good test: if you could lift your domain code into a different language or framework with zero changes to the logic itself, you've achieved true independence."
Surrounding the domain is the **Application Layer**, sometimes called the *Use Case* or *Interactors* layer.
88
102
@@ -91,14 +105,14 @@ This is where **workflows** live — the orchestration of domain rules to achiev
91
105
- “Publish Post”
92
106
- “Send Welcome Email”
93
107
94
-
The application layer doesn’t know how to persist data or send emails. It just knows *that it needs to*.
108
+
The application layer doesn’t know how to persist data or send emails. It just knows *that it needs to*.
95
109
So it calls abstractions — interfaces like `UserRepository` or `EmailGateway` — without knowing who implements them.
96
110
97
-
That’s dependency inversion in action.
111
+
> That’s dependency inversion in action.
98
112
99
113
---
100
114
101
-
### 🔴 **3. Interface Adapters**
115
+
### 🔴 Interface Adapters
102
116
103
117
Here, the **outside world** starts to meet your **inner logic**.
104
118
@@ -108,15 +122,15 @@ The Interface Adapter layer includes:
108
122
- Repository Interfaces (the boundaries between persistence and business logic)
109
123
- Auth Contexts and Gateways (like S3 or event buses)
110
124
111
-
This layer’s job is to **translate**:
112
-
- From external formats → into internal structures your use cases can understand.
125
+
This layer’s job is to **translate**:
126
+
- From external formats → into internal structures your use cases can understand.
113
127
- And back again → into formats the world expects.
114
128
115
-
It’s the bridge between domain purity and framework practicality.
129
+
> It’s the bridge between domain purity and framework practicality.
116
130
117
131
---
118
132
119
-
### 🔵 **4. Frameworks & Drivers**
133
+
### 🔵 Infrastructure
120
134
121
135
Finally, at the outer ring lies all the infrastructure you *can change* — or at least, you want to *be able to*.
122
136
@@ -131,8 +145,9 @@ This includes:
131
145
132
146
These are essential, but **they should never define your business logic**.
133
147
134
-
They depend inward, implementing interfaces that the inner layers define.
135
-
This is the inversion of control that keeps your system clean — your *core* defines the contracts; your *infrastructure* provides the implementations.
148
+
They depend inward, implementing interfaces that the inner layers define.
149
+
150
+
> This is the inversion of control that keeps your system clean — your *core* defines the contracts; your *infrastructure* provides the implementations.
136
151
137
152
---
138
153
@@ -142,81 +157,140 @@ Most Clean Architecture diagrams draw the four concentric rings and stop there
142
157
143
158
But in real life, these utilities *permeate everything*.
144
159
145
-
Your logging system affects controllers and use cases.
146
-
Your validation framework interacts with both API models and domain entities.
160
+
Your logging system affects controllers and use cases.
161
+
Your validation framework interacts with both API models and domain entities.
147
162
Your cryptography or hashing utilities might be used anywhere.
148
163
149
164
So, how do we visualize that?
150
165
151
-
### 💡 The Solution: The “Cross-Cutting Wedge”
166
+
### 💡 The Solution: The "Cross-Cutting Wedge"
152
167
153
-
Instead of a fifth ring or a footnote, this diagram projects a **gray wedge** outward from the center — cutting through every layer.
168
+
Instead of a fifth ring or a footnote, this diagram projects a **gray wedge**
169
+
outward from the center — cutting through every layer.
154
170
155
171
Inside it sit the typical utilities shared across all levels:
156
-
- 📟 **Logging**
157
-
- ⚙️ **Utils**
158
-
- 🧹 **Validation**
159
-
- 🔐 **Crypto**
160
-
- ⚡ **Config**
161
-
- 💥 **Exceptions**
162
-
163
-
This “cross-cutting slice” communicates two powerful truths:
164
-
1. These utilities *touch every layer* — they’re universal.
165
-
2. But they *don’t depend on any layer* — they’re foundational.
172
+
- 📟 **Logging** - observability without coupling
173
+
- ⚙️ **Utils** - pure functions with no dependencies
174
+
- 🧹 **Validation** - input checking at boundaries
175
+
- 🔐 **Crypto** - security primitives
176
+
- ⚡ **Config** - environment-agnostic settings
177
+
- 💥 **Exceptions** - standardized error handling
166
178
167
-
It’s both visually elegant and conceptually accurate — something that most architectural diagrams fail to show clearly.
179
+
**Key principle**: These utilities can be *used by* any layer but *depend on* none of them.
180
+
They're foundational infrastructure that makes other layers possible without creating coupling.
168
181
182
+
> This is different from the outer "Infrastructure" layer, which implements external system concerns. Cross-cutting utilities are internal helpers that remain pure and reusable.
169
183
---
170
184
185
+
171
186
## 🔀 The Dependency Rule (and Why It’s Sacred)
172
187
173
188
> **Source code dependencies always point inward.**
174
189
175
-
- The Domain depends on nothing.
176
-
- The Application depends only on the Domain.
177
-
- The Interface Adapters depend only on the Application and Domain.
178
-
- The Frameworks depend on everyone above.
190
+
- The Domain layer depends on nothing.
191
+
- The Application layer depends only on the Domain.
192
+
- The Interface Adapters layer depend only on the Application and Domain.
193
+
- The Infrastructure layer on everyone above.
194
+
195
+
> That’s why the arrows in the diagram point inward — visually enforcing that rule.
196
+
197
+
198
+
### 🔄 The Magic of Dependency Inversion
199
+
200
+
The Dependency Rule works through a crucial technique: **Dependency Inversion**.
201
+
202
+
Instead of the Application layer depending on concrete Infrastructure implementations,
203
+
it defines *interfaces* (like `UserRepository` or `PaymentGateway`) and depends on those abstractions.
204
+
205
+
The Infrastructure layer then *implements* these interfaces, creating a reversal of
206
+
the typical dependency direction. The high-level policy (Application) dictates the
207
+
contract, and the low-level details (Infrastructure) conform to it.
208
+
209
+
> This is why you can swap databases or frameworks without touching the core logic.
179
210
180
-
That’s why the arrows in your diagram point inward — visually enforcing that rule.
| Initial Setup Time | Fast | Moderate | Moderate |
264
+
| Testability | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
265
+
| Flexibility | Moderate | High | High |
266
+
| Cognitive Load | Low | Medium | Medium |
267
+
| Best Use Case | Web apps, APIs, microservices | Multi-protocol integrations | Complex domains |
268
+
269
+
> Clean Architecture shines when you need separation of concerns and a good long-term architecture.
270
+
271
+
---
272
+
273
+
## ✨ Migrating to Clean Architecture
274
+
275
+
You don't need a rewrite. Start small:
276
+
277
+
1.**Identify your core domain** - extract business rules from controllers
278
+
2.**Create use case classes** - move orchestration logic out of controllers
279
+
3.**Define repository interfaces** - abstract data access behind contracts
280
+
4.**Move entities to the domain** - strip framework dependencies
281
+
5.**Implement adapters** - connect your clean core to existing infrastructure
208
282
209
-
In short: it’s not about building slower. It’s about building smarter — with an architecture that bends but doesn’t break.
283
+
> Focus on new features first; build them cleanly while old code remains. Gradually migrate hot paths. Clean Architecture rewards incremental adoption.
210
284
211
285
---
212
286
213
-
## 🗭 Final Thoughts
287
+
## 🏁 Final Thoughts
214
288
215
-
Clean Architecture isn’t dogma — it’s a guide.
289
+
Clean Architecture isn’t dogma — it’s a guide.
216
290
It means being *intentional* about where code lives, who depends on whom, and how change flows through your system.
217
291
218
-
The moment you respect the **Dependency Rule**, your codebase starts to breathe again.
219
-
Suddenly, frameworks feel optional. Tests become easy. New features slot in naturally.
292
+
The moment you respect the **Dependency Rule**, your codebase starts to breathe again.
293
+
Suddenly, frameworks feel optional. Tests become easy. New features slot in naturally.
@@ -225,9 +299,9 @@ If you’re tired of fighting tangled dependencies and fragile frameworks, it’
225
299
226
300
---
227
301
228
-
### 🧹 About the Diagram
302
+
### ✍️ About the Diagram
229
303
230
-
This article’s diagram introduces a new visual concept — the **Cross-Cutting Concerns Wedge** — that projects from the core outward, cutting across all layers.
304
+
This article’s diagram introduces a new visual concept — the **Cross-Cutting Concerns Wedge** — that projects from the core outward, cutting across all layers.
231
305
It shows how utilities like logging, configuration, and validation *touch every layer* but *depend on none* — completing the story Clean Architecture has always wanted to tell.
0 commit comments