Copilot Agent Prompt Clustering Analysis - 2025-12-22 #7211
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Daily NLP-based clustering analysis of copilot agent task prompts.
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days
Total Tasks Analyzed: 2,328
Clusters Identified: 10
Overall Success Rate: 72.9% (1,697 merged)
Data Source: PRs #2097-#7207
Using K-means clustering with TF-IDF vectorization, we identified 10 distinct clusters of task patterns in copilot agent prompts. The analysis reveals clear patterns in task types, complexity, and success rates.
Key Insights
Top Performing Clusters
Cluster 10 (Version/CLI tasks): 79.0% success rate
Cluster 9 (Update/Command tasks): 78.0% success rate
Cluster 2 (Package/Workflow tasks): 77.8% success rate
Most Common Task Types
Cluster 1 (Add/Fix): 28.9% of all tasks (673 tasks)
Complexity Analysis
Most Iterative (requiring most refinement):
These complex tasks involve architectural changes and may benefit from more detailed specifications.
Full Analysis Report
General Insights
Cluster Analysis
Cluster 1: Add, Fix
Sample Task:
Add more docs on security...Cluster 5: Workflows, Gh
Cluster 2: Pkg, Pkg Workflow
Cluster 7: Agentic, Agentic Workflow
Cluster 9: Update, Command
Cluster 6: Agent, Github
Cluster 8: Comments, Issue_Title
Cluster 3: Safe, Safe Output
Cluster 4: Mcp, Server
Cluster 10: Version, Cli
Success Rate by Cluster
Sample of Analyzed PRs
Key Findings
Clear Specification Wins: Clusters with highest success rates (Version/CLI, Update/Command) feature well-defined, focused tasks with clear objectives.
Complexity Matters: Tasks requiring 4.5+ commits (Safe Output, MCP Server) involve architectural changes and show lower success rates (63-65%). These benefit from:
Documentation Excellence: Documentation tasks show 78% success rate, making them ideal candidates for agent automation.
Middle Ground Challenges: Cluster 8 (Comments/Issue handling) shows lowest success rate (62%), suggesting refactoring tasks with scattered changes are more challenging.
Recommendations
Based on this clustering analysis:
Optimize for High-Success Patterns:
Break Down Complex Tasks:
Leverage Documentation Tasks:
Improve Scattered Refactoring:
Methodology
Analysis Artifacts:
/tmp/gh-aw/agent/clustering-report.md/tmp/gh-aw/agent/clustering-data.json/tmp/gh-aw/python/charts/clustering-analysis.pngNext Steps: Consider running weekly to track trends in task patterns and success rates over time.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions