Skip to content

[BLOCKER for EU] BBS+ signatures not eIDAS 2.0 compliant - consider BBS# for EU Digital Identity Wallet compatibility #5666

@kolesarp1

Description

@kolesarp1

Problem Description

Guardian currently uses BBS+ signatures for Verifiable Credentials with selective disclosure. While BBS+ provides excellent privacy properties (unlinkability, selective disclosure), it cannot achieve eIDAS 2.0 Level of Assurance High certification required for EU Digital Identity Wallets.

The European Commission has explicitly rejected BBS/BBS+ for eIDAS compliance due to two critical issues:

  1. Pairing-friendly curves not SOG-IS certified: BBS+ relies on BLS12-381 curve with bilinear pairings. Current certified secure hardware (HSMs, Secure Enclaves, Android StrongBox, TPMs) required for eIDAS LoA High does not support pairing operations or pairing-friendly curves.

  2. Non-SOG-IS compliant holder binding: The holder binding mechanism in BBS+ uses BBS-native operations rather than approved signature schemes like ECDSA or EC-Schnorr (ISO/IEC 14888-3).

This means Guardian-issued credentials using BBS+ cannot be used in EU Digital Identity Wallet ecosystems targeting November 2026 deployment deadline.

Reference

Orange Innovation has developed BBS# (BBS Sharp), a variant that solves these compliance issues while retaining all BBS+ privacy features:


Steps to Reproduce

  1. Issue a Verifiable Credential using Guardian with BBS+ signatures
  2. Attempt to use this credential in an eIDAS 2.0 compliant EU Digital Identity Wallet
  3. Credential cannot be verified by certified WSCD (Wallet Secure Cryptographic Device) because:
    • Hardware lacks pairing operation support
    • Holder binding doesn't use SOG-IS approved algorithms

Expected Behavior

Guardian should support credential formats that are compliant with eIDAS 2.0 Architecture Reference Framework (ARF), enabling:

  • Issuance of credentials usable in EU Digital Identity Wallets
  • Verification using standard certified hardware (HSMs, Secure Enclaves)
  • SOG-IS compliant holder binding (ECDSA/EC-Schnorr on secp256r1)

Actual Behavior

Guardian uses BBS+ with BLS12-381 pairing-friendly curves, which:

  • Cannot be verified on certified secure hardware
  • Uses non-compliant holder binding
  • Is explicitly rejected by European Commission for LoA High

Proposed Solution

Consider implementing BBS# as an alternative/additional signature scheme. Key advantages:

Feature BBS+ (current) BBS# (proposed)
Unlinkability
Selective Disclosure
Everlasting Privacy
Uses classic curves (secp256r1)
SOG-IS compliant holder binding ✅ (ECDSA/EC-Schnorr)
Works with existing HSMs/SE
eIDAS 2.0 LoA High certifiable
ISO mDL compatible

BBS# achieves this by:

  • Replacing pairing verification with ZKP discrete log equality proofs
  • Using ECDSA/EC-Schnorr for holder binding with secure key splitting
  • Operating on classic elliptic curves (secp256r1) supported by all certified hardware

Impact

Organizations using Guardian for:

  • Islamic finance credentials (requiring EU cross-border recognition)
  • Supply chain attestations in EU markets
  • Any regulated use case requiring eIDAS compliance

...will be blocked from EU Digital Identity Wallet interoperability without this change.


Additional Context

  • EU Digital Identity Wallet deployment deadline: November 2026
  • Orange has tested BBS# on smartphones with ~50ms performance on SIM cards and Android StrongBox
  • The cryptographic security of BBS# is proven (inherits BBS security from Eurocrypt 2023, plus Oblivious Issuance Proofs from Crypto 2024)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions