Please update to API 101 of lsposed

[myst-25]

Hey i just installed lsposed IT which uses the API 101 and later every lsposed framework gonna use it so please update it.

[Lanchon]

Warning

LSPosed IT is a MALWARE:
https://xdaforums.com/t/closed-warning-lsposed-it-is-a-malware.4738989/

use FLOSS instead:
https://github.com/JingMatrix/NeoZygisk
https://github.com/JingMatrix/LSPosed

[devnoname120]

Warning

LSPosed IT is a MALWARE: xdaforums.com/t/closed-warning-lsposed-it-is-a-malware.4738989

This story is fake. But yeah, use the open-source forks rather than the closed source LSPosed IT.

[faaaaq]

Warning
LSPosed IT is a MALWARE: xdaforums.com/t/closed-warning-lsposed-it-is-a-malware.4738989

This story is fake. But yeah, use the open-source forks rather than the closed source LSPosed IT.

"Fake" is a stretch, but not entirely false to say. Its more that the story is wrong/misleading. LSPosed IT itself isnt malware, but it can easily be utilized, via compromised modules, to do the EXACT things OP of that XDA thread mentioned. So TLDR, they installed LSPosed IT, and then installed a compromised/fake module that then used their phone for malicious purposes.

[Lanchon]

well how can you know it is fake? did you reverse engineered the program? or is this fake based on "vibes"?

and is it fake now, or will it always be fake? what could be the motivation for somebody doing something as crazy sensitive as an xposed style hooking framework, but then keeping it closed source? what could there be to be gained by such a strategy? and could maximal gains be obtained by establishing an innocuous "product" and subvert it when it gains enough users?

if you are going to completely compromise the security model of you device and run software on it of effectively unknown origin with maximum privileges, you better be running nothing but free games there.

or... use FLOSS instead.

[Lanchon]

in any case, i do not know if the story is fake or not.

nor do i care. the story could not be fake. or it could be fake just for now. this is reason enough not to consider using such software ever.

[devnoname120]

Yeah I mean I’m all for FLOSS and everything but that’s not a reason to spread unsubstantiated claims. I’m not really interested in debating this further and don’t be mistaken I didn’t learn anything that I didn’t already know, I just wanted to set the record straight.

[Lanchon]

that’s not a reason to spread unsubstantiated claims

well the post i linked tells a different story. and the whole point behind this person's posts is to use a known good FLOSS alternative instead. and that that fixed the problem for him, presumably while using the same module(s). so there is some "substance" to this claim. (and i found no substance contradicting this, though i did not look much because i have zero interest on a non-FLOSS xposed framework.)

the only "evidence" against it is you saying it is unsubstantiated, but then providing no source for it. which means that unsubstantiated claim here is actually your claim.

I’m not really interested in debating this further

fair enough. just don't expect me to take your claims seriously without sources.

[devnoname120]

@myst-25 Can you try this version? I ported it to API 101 but I don’t have an Android phone anymore so I cannot meaningfully test.

app-debug.apk.zip

Edit: new version rebased on top of @kavishdevar’s android/testing branch. It supports both LSPosed API 100 and API 101:

app-debug-rebased.zip

[myself-6264]

I don't have airpods at this time so I cannot use.

@myst-25 Can you try this version? I ported it to API 101 but I don’t have an Android phone anymore so I cannot meaningfully test.

app-debug.apk.zip