Skip to content

MVR xchange Unified Global Import dialog library and Workflow consistency. #298

@kinglevel

Description

@kinglevel

I’m not a software architect — just a lighting guy, with some software capability.
But we need to address the elephant in the room with MVR.

MVR shouldn’t just be a file format. It should be a shared ecosystem.
As expected with MVR xchange, it is probably comming. (?)

As of right now, every manufacturer implements MVR differently.
Import/export behavior, patch merging, fixture mapping — it all varies — a mess.
That makes moving between systems harder than it needs to be.

What we really need is a standard public MVR libraries that offers UI capabilites in different forms — an open, shared implementation that manufacturers can integrate directly.

Be it C++, Python libraries, compilied shell binaries or other handy tools.
Like NDI has done with their tools.

Import/export logic.
Patch conflict handling.
Validation rules.
UI Dialog workflows.

Ideally, it would include a scalable reference UI (desktop, web, touch, cmdline) so the experience feels familiar across all softwares.

MVR was a big step forward.
The next step is workflow consistency.

And i hope that MVR Exchange thinks of this in a more unified global way, and not just network capability, so MVR will be that format we all want.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions