@@ -28,23 +28,23 @@ TEST(NodeCrypto, NewRootCertStore) {
2828 */
2929TEST (NodeCrypto, MemoryTrackingConstants) {
3030 // Verify that our memory tracking constants are defined and reasonable
31- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 0 )
31+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3232 << " SSL_CTX size constant should be positive" ;
33- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 0 )
33+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3434 << " X509 size constant should be positive" ;
35- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 0 )
35+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3636 << " EVP_MD_CTX size constant should be positive" ;
3737
3838 // Verify reasonable size ranges (basic sanity check)
39- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 10000 )
39+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 10000 ) )
4040 << " SSL_CTX size should be reasonable" ;
41- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 10000 )
41+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 10000 ) )
4242 << " X509 size should be reasonable" ;
43- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 1000 )
43+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 1000 ) )
4444 << " EVP_MD_CTX size should be reasonable" ;
4545
4646 // Specific values we expect based on our implementation
47- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 240 );
48- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 128 );
49- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 48 );
47+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 240 ) );
48+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 128 ) );
49+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 48 ) );
5050}
0 commit comments