roc_sender_bind & roc_receiver_connect #810
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hi, I don't remember if they were ever present in headers, but they were never implemented so far. To make it possible we need a signaling protocol like RTSP, which was planned a while ago but then postponed (hence these functions were mentioned in docs - I hoped to add them soon). I still have plans for RTSP but don't have any estimate unfortunately. Related issues are #200 and #216. We merged mostly finished SDP support, but nobody started work on RTSP. BTW, besides binding/connecting both ways, RTSP will also eliminate the need of 3 endpoints (source, repair, control) - it would be possible to use just one aggregate rtsp:// endpoint for everything, and it will automatically create low-level endpoints under the hood. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @gavv Sorry - my mistake. I think they were in some old headers but I didn't check the implementations. It sounds like RTSP would be a nice way to go, but I see from #216 that there's a lot to be done! Thanks P |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
A little while ago
roc_sender_bindandroc_receiver_connectwere removed, so that now only receivers bind and only senders connect. It would be really useful to have it work both ways. What was the reason for removing them?Thanks,
P
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions