Refactor linear algebra module and remove unused code #195
Conversation
WalkthroughThe CI workflow was updated to replace the "Pure V Backend with Pure C Blas" test step with "Pure V Backend with Pure C Backend" using both Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (2)
- blas/v.mod
- lapack/v.mod
Files selected for processing (28)
- bin/test (1 hunks)
- blas/README.md (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/conversions.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/dgemm.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/dgemv.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/dgemv_test.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/error.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/level1f64.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/level1f64_ddot.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/level2f64.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/level3f64.v (1 hunks)
- blas/blas64/util.v (1 hunks)
- blas/cflags_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v (2 hunks)
- blas/conversions.v (1 hunks)
- blas/oblas_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1 hunks)
- blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1 hunks)
- la/blas.v (16 hunks)
- la/densesol.v (2 hunks)
- la/matrix_ops.v (5 hunks)
- lapack/README.md (1 hunks)
- lapack/cflags_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke copy.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/cflags_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/errors.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack_common.v (3 hunks)
- lapack/lapack_default.c.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack_macos.c.v (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- blas/blas64/conversions.v
- blas/blas64/dgemm.v
- blas/blas64/dgemv.v
- blas/blas64/error.v
- blas/blas64/level1f64.v
- blas/blas64/level2f64.v
- blas/blas64/level3f64.v
- blas/blas64/util.v
Additional comments: 43
lapack/lapack_macos.c.v (1)
- 1-4: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-7]
The module name change and the function implementation look good.
lapack/lapack_default.c.v (2)
1-5: The module name change and the updated import statement are correct.
1-8: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-9]
The update to the
C.LAPACKE_dlangefunction signature and the public functiondlangewrapper are consistent with the refactoring to useblas64.lapack/cflags_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke copy.v (1)
- 1-10: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-13]
The module name change, compiler flags, and conditional inclusion of "lapacke.h" for macOS are correct.
la/densesol.v (1)
- 1-8: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-19]
The update to the import statement and the
den_solvefunction to uselapack.dgesvis correct.blas/cflags_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1)
- 7-15: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-11]
The module name change, compiler flags, and conditional inclusion of "cblas.h" for macOS are correct.
blas/blas64/level1f64_ddot.v (1)
- 1-4: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-34]
The module name change to "blas64" and the import statement update are correct. The
ddotfunction logic and error handling are appropriate.lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1)
- 1-51: The import statements and the
dgetrffunction logic and error handling are correct.lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1)
- 1-56: The import statements and the
dgesvfunction logic and error handling are correct.bin/test (1)
- 31-31: The flag change from
-d vsl_vlas_cblasto-d vsl_blas_cblasis correct and consistent with the module refactoring.lapack/README.md (1)
- 1-58: The documentation updates in the README.md file are correct, reflecting the new compilation flag and providing clear installation instructions for dependencies.
blas/README.md (1)
- 1-66: The documentation updates in the README.md file are correct, reflecting the new compilation flag and providing clear installation instructions for dependencies.
blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1)
- 1-81: The module name change to "blas" and the updated import statement are correct. The inline functions are appropriate wrappers for the
blas64functions.blas/blas64/dgemv_test.v (2)
1-1: The module name change to "blas64" is correct.
2-2: The test functions for
dgemvare correctly implemented.la/matrix_ops.v (2)
4-4: The update to the import statement from
vsl.vlastovsl.lapackis correct.5-5: The updates to the functions
matrix_det,matrix_inv_small,matrix_svd, andmatrix_invto use thelapackmodule are correct.lapack/lapack_common.v (2)
1-5: The module name change to "lapack" and the updated import statements are correct.
7-23: The updates to the C function declarations to use
blas64.MemoryLayoutare correct and consistent with the refactoring.lapack/lapack64/errors.v (1)
- 1-178: The constants for error messages in
lapack/lapack64/errors.vare consistent and clear.blas/conversions.v (3)
1-7: The module name and import path have been updated correctly from
vlastoblas.9-13: The function signatures have been updated to use the new
blas64types, which is consistent with the module changes.1-16: > Note: This review was outside the patches, and no patch overlapping with it was found. Original lines [17-178]
The utility functions for matrix and vector operations remain unchanged and are consistent and clear.
la/blas.v (16)
3-3: The import statement has been updated correctly from
vsl.vlastovsl.blas.50-50: The reference to
vlas.ddothas been correctly replaced withblas.ddot.69-69: The reference to
vlas.daxpyhas been correctly replaced withblas.daxpy.139-139: The reference to
vlas.dgemvhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemv.170-170: The reference to
vlas.dgemvfor the transpose operation has been correctly replaced withblas.dgemv.202-202: The reference to
vlas.dgerhas been correctly replaced withblas.dger.223-223: The reference to
vlas.dgemvinmatrix_vector_mul_addhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemv.243-243: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_matrix_mulhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.263-263: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_tr_matrix_mulhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.272-272: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_matrix_tr_mulhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.281-281: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_tr_matrix_tr_mulhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.290-290: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_matrix_muladdhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.299-299: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_tr_matrix_muladdhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.308-308: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_matrix_tr_muladdhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.317-317: The reference to
vlas.dgemminmatrix_tr_matrix_tr_mul_addhas been correctly replaced withblas.dgemm.328-328: The reference to
vlas.daxpyinmatrix_addhas been correctly replaced withblas.daxpy.blas/oblas_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v (4)
1-3: The module has been renamed to
blasand now importsvsl.blas64.blas64. This change aligns with the PR's objective to refactor the linear algebra module.5-172: The C function declarations appear to be correctly defined with appropriate parameter types and return types matching the BLAS library's API.
191-448: The V public functions use
unsafeto pass array pointers to the C functions. This is necessary for performance reasons but requires careful handling to ensure safety. The functions are marked asinline, which is appropriate for small wrapper functions to avoid function call overhead.191-448: The use of
unsafeis justified in this context as it is required for performance-critical numerical computations where direct memory access is necessary. Ensure that the arrays passed to these functions are always valid and that their lifetimes are managed correctly to prevent undefined behavior.
| // set_num_threads sets the number of threads in OpenBLAS | ||
| pub fn set_num_threads(n int) { | ||
| C.openblas_set_num_threads(n) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sdsdot(n int, alpha f32, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int) f32 { | ||
| return C.cblas_sdsdot(n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dsdot(n int, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int) f64 { | ||
| return C.cblas_dsdot(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sdot(n int, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int) f32 { | ||
| return C.cblas_sdot(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ddot(n int, x []f64, incx int, y []f64, incy int) f64 { | ||
| return C.cblas_ddot(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sasum(n int, x []f32, incx int) f32 { | ||
| return C.cblas_sasum(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dasum(n int, x []f64, incx int) f64 { | ||
| return C.cblas_dasum(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ssum(n int, x []f32, incx int) f32 { | ||
| return C.cblas_ssum(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dsum(n int, x []f64, incx int) f64 { | ||
| return C.cblas_dsum(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn snrm2(n int, x []f32, incx int) f32 { | ||
| return C.cblas_snrm2(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dnrm2(n int, x []f64, incx int) f64 { | ||
| return C.cblas_dnrm2(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn isamax(n int, x []f32, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_isamax(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn idamax(n int, x []f64, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_idamax(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn isamin(n int, x []f32, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_isamin(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn idamin(n int, x &f64, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_idamin(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ismax(n int, x []f32, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_ismax(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn idmax(n int, x []f64, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_idmax(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ismin(n int, x []f32, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_ismin(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn idmin(n int, x []f64, incx int) int { | ||
| return C.cblas_idmin(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn saxpy(n int, alpha f32, x []f32, incx int, mut y []f32, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_saxpy(n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn daxpy(n int, alpha f64, x []f64, incx int, mut y []f64, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_daxpy(n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn scopy(n int, mut x []f32, incx int, mut y []f32, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_scopy(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dcopy(n int, mut x []f64, incx int, mut y []f64, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dcopy(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sswap(n int, mut x []f32, incx int, mut y []f32, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_sswap(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dswap(n int, mut x []f64, incx int, mut y []f64, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dswap(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn srot(n int, mut x []f32, incx int, mut y []f32, incy int, c f32, s f32) { | ||
| C.cblas_srot(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, c, s) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn drot(n int, mut x []f64, incx int, mut y []f64, incy int, c f64, s f64) { | ||
| C.cblas_drot(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, c, s) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn srotg(a f32, b f32, c f32, s f32) { | ||
| C.cblas_srotg(&a, &b, &c, &s) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn drotg(a f64, b f64, c f64, s f64) { | ||
| C.cblas_drotg(&a, &b, &c, &s) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn srotm(n int, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int, p []f32) { | ||
| C.cblas_srotm(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, unsafe { &p[0] }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn drotm(n int, x []f64, incx int, y []f64, incy int, p []f64) { | ||
| C.cblas_drotm(n, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, unsafe { &p[0] }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn srotmg(d1 f32, d2 f32, b1 f32, b2 f32, p []f32) { | ||
| C.cblas_srotmg(&d1, &d2, &b1, b2, unsafe { &p[0] }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn drotmg(d1 f64, d2 f64, b1 f64, b2 f32, p []f64) { | ||
| C.cblas_drotmg(&d1, &d2, &b1, b2, unsafe { &p[0] }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sscal(n int, alpha f32, mut x []f32, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_sscal(n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dscal(n int, alpha f64, mut x []f64, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dscal(n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sgemv(trans bool, m int, n int, alpha f32, a []f32, lda int, x []f32, incx int, beta f32, mut y []f32, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_sgemv(.row_major, c_trans(trans), m, n, alpha, unsafe { &a[0] }, lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, | ||
| incx, beta, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dgemv(trans bool, m int, n int, alpha f64, a []f64, lda int, x []f64, incx int, beta f64, mut y []f64, incy int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dgemv(.row_major, c_trans(trans), m, n, alpha, unsafe { &a[0] }, lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, | ||
| incx, beta, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sger(m int, n int, alpha f32, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int, mut a []f32, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_sger(.row_major, m, n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, | ||
| unsafe { &a[0] }, lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dger(m int, n int, alpha f64, x []f64, incx int, y []f64, incy int, mut a []f64, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dger(.row_major, m, n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, incy, | ||
| unsafe { &a[0] }, lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn strsv(uplo bool, trans_a bool, diag blas64.Diagonal, n int, a []f32, lda int, mut x []f32, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_strsv(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), c_trans(trans_a), diag, n, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dtrsv(uplo bool, trans_a bool, diag blas64.Diagonal, n int, a []f64, lda int, mut x []f64, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dtrsv(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), c_trans(trans_a), diag, n, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn strmv(uplo bool, trans_a bool, diag blas64.Diagonal, n int, a []f32, lda int, mut x []f32, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_strmv(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), c_trans(trans_a), diag, n, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dtrmv(uplo bool, trans_a bool, diag blas64.Diagonal, n int, a []f64, lda int, mut x []f64, incx int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dtrmv(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), c_trans(trans_a), diag, n, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ssyr(uplo bool, n int, alpha f32, x []f32, incx int, mut a []f32, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_ssyr(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dsyr(uplo bool, n int, alpha f64, x []f64, incx int, mut a []f64, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dsyr(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn ssyr2(uplo bool, n int, alpha f32, x []f32, incx int, y []f32, incy int, mut a []f32, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_ssyr2(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, | ||
| incy, unsafe { &a[0] }, lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dsyr2(uplo bool, n int, alpha f64, x []f64, incx int, y []f64, incy int, mut a []f64, lda int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dsyr2(.row_major, c_uplo(uplo), n, alpha, unsafe { &x[0] }, incx, unsafe { &y[0] }, | ||
| incy, unsafe { &a[0] }, lda) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn sgemm(trans_a bool, trans_b bool, m int, n int, k int, alpha f32, a []f32, lda int, b []f32, ldb int, beta f32, mut cc []f32, ldc int) { | ||
| C.cblas_sgemm(.row_major, c_trans(trans_a), c_trans(trans_b), m, n, k, alpha, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &b[0] }, ldb, beta, unsafe { &cc[0] }, ldc) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dgemm(trans_a bool, trans_b bool, m int, n int, k int, alpha f64, a []f64, lda int, b []f64, ldb int, beta f64, mut cc []f64, ldc int) { | ||
| C.cblas_dgemm(.row_major, c_trans(trans_a), c_trans(trans_b), m, n, k, alpha, unsafe { &a[0] }, | ||
| lda, unsafe { &b[0] }, ldb, beta, unsafe { &cc[0] }, ldc) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding tests for the new wrapper functions to ensure they correctly interface with the C BLAS library and handle edge cases appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- blas/blas64/conversions.v (1 hunks)
- blas/conversions.v (1 hunks)
- blas/oblas_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1 hunks)
- blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack_common.v (3 hunks)
- lapack/lapack_default.c.v (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- blas/conversions.v
- blas/oblas_d_vsl_blas_cblas.v
- blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v
- lapack/lapack_common.v
- lapack/lapack_default.c.v
Additional comments: 1
blas/blas64/conversions.v (1)
- 1-33: The enums
MemoryLayout,Transpose,Uplo,Diagonal, andSideare well-defined and appropriately documented. The naming convention is consistent, and the values seem to be aligned with the typical BLAS library constants. This should make the usage of the enums intuitive for those familiar with BLAS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v
Additional comments: 8
lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v (8)
19-19: The function signature for
dgetrsis clear and matches the documentation provided. It accepts parameters for the transpose type, matrix dimensions, matrix data, leading dimensions, pivot indices, and right-hand side matrix.20-34: The input validation checks for
trans,n,nrhs,lda, andldbare thorough and follow good practices by checking for invalid values and throwing appropriate panic messages.37-38: The quick return check for
n == 0 || nrhs == 0is a good performance optimization to avoid unnecessary computation when there are no equations to solve or no right-hand sides.41-49: The length checks for the arrays
a,b, andipivare correct and ensure that the arrays are of sufficient size to hold the necessary data for the matrix operations.51-58: The logic for solving the system of equations when
trans != .no_transis correct. It uses the LAPACK utilitydlaswpand BLAS functionsdtrsmto perform the necessary matrix operations.61-66: The logic for solving the transposed system of equations is correct. It uses the BLAS function
dtrsmfor both the upper and lower triangular matrix solutions and applies the LAPACK utilitydlaswpto adjust the right-hand side matrixb.19-66: Ensure that the constants used for transpose types and matrix sides (e.g.,
.no_trans,.trans,.conj_trans,.left,.upper,.lower,.unit,.non_unit) are consistent with theblasmodule's definitions and that they are correctly implemented in theblasmodule.20-34: Verify that the panic messages (e.g.,
bad_trans,n_lt0,nrhs_lt0,bad_ld_a,bad_ld_b,short_ab,short_b,bad_len_ipiv) are defined elsewhere in the codebase and provide meaningful error messages to the user.Verification successful
The panic messages such as
bad_trans,n_lt0,nrhs_lt0,bad_ld_a,bad_ld_b,short_ab,short_b, andbad_len_ipivare defined in thelapack/lapack64/errors.vfile and are used throughout thelapack64andblas64modules to provide meaningful error messages.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the panic messages in the codebase. rg --type v 'bad_trans|n_lt0|nrhs_lt0|bad_ld_a|bad_ld_b|short_ab|short_b|bad_len_ipiv'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the panic message definitions without specifying the file type. rg 'bad_trans|n_lt0|nrhs_lt0|bad_ld_a|bad_ld_b|short_ab|short_b|bad_len_ipiv'Length of output: 2432
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- blas/README.md (1 hunks)
- blas/conversions.v (1 hunks)
- la/blas.v (16 hunks)
- lapack/README.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 28
blas/README.md (4)
- 1-3: The introduction clearly states the purpose of the package. Ensure the implementation details mentioned align with the actual code changes.
- 5-8: The table provides a clear overview of the backends available. Verify that the compilation flags and status descriptions are up-to-date with the latest codebase changes.
Verification successful
The grep results confirm the documentation accuracy for the OpenBLAS backend's compilation flag
-d vsl_blas_cblasas mentioned in theblas/README.mdand its usage within the repository, specifically in abin/testscript. This suggests that the documentation for the OpenBLAS backend is up-to-date regarding the compilation flag.However, the review comment's request to verify the compilation flags and status descriptions for all backends, including the "Pure V implementation," was only partially addressed. The verification focused on the OpenBLAS backend, and there was no specific flag to verify for the "Pure V implementation" backend based on the provided context. Therefore, while the OpenBLAS backend documentation is verified to be accurate, the review did not fully cover the "Pure V implementation" backend's status or compilation flags.
* 12-20: The OpenBLAS backend section is informative. Confirm that the installation instructions for OpenBLAS are still valid and that the compilation flag `-d vsl_blas_cblas` is correctly implemented in the build process. * 27-59: Installation instructions for macOS, Debian/Ubuntu, and Arch Linux/Manjaro are provided. Ensure these instructions are current and correct for installing OpenBLAS on these platforms.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the compilation flags for BLAS backends are correctly documented. grep -r "vsl_blas_cblas" .Length of output: 432
lapack/README.md (4)
- 1-3: The introduction succinctly explains the purpose of the LAPACK package. Confirm that the implementation details are consistent with the code changes.
- 5-9: The backend table lists BLAS and LAPACKE with their statuses and compilation flags. Verify that these details accurately reflect the current state of the codebase and documentation.
- 13-21: The LAPACKE backend section provides useful information. Ensure the installation instructions for LAPACKE are accurate and that the compilation flag
-d vsl_lapack_lapackeis correctly implemented.- 28-58: Installation instructions for macOS, Debian/Ubuntu, and Arch Linux/Manjaro are detailed. Confirm these instructions are up-to-date for installing LAPACKE on these platforms.
la/blas.v (16)
- 3-3: The import statement correctly references the updated
blasmodule. Confirm that all necessary functions and types fromblasare available and used correctly throughout the file.- 41-41: The use of
blas.ddotfor the dot product operation is appropriate. Ensure that the parameters passed match the expected signature ofddotin theblasmodule.- 60-60: The call to
blas.daxpyfor vector addition is correctly implemented. Verify that the performance implications of usingdaxpyover manual looping for smaller vectors are considered.- 130-130: The use of
blas.dgemvfor matrix-vector multiplication is correct. Check that the parameters and the decision to usedgemvbased on matrix dimensions are optimal.- 160-160: The implementation of
blas.dgemvfor the transpose(matrix)-vector multiplication is appropriate. Confirm that the boolean flag for transposition is correctly passed.- 191-191: The call to
blas.dgerfor vector-vector transpose multiplication is correctly used. Ensure that the dimensions and scaling factor are correctly applied.- 211-211: The use of
blas.dgemvwith an addition operation is correctly implemented. Verify that the addition flag (1.0 for beta) is correctly utilized for the operation.- 231-231: The call to
blas.dgemmfor matrix multiplication is correct. Ensure that the parameters, including the no-transpose flags and scaling factors, are accurately passed.- 251-251: The implementation of
blas.dgemmfor transposed matrix multiplication is appropriate. Confirm that the transposition flag for matrixais correctly set.- 260-260: The use of
blas.dgemmfor matrix multiplication with transposedbis correctly implemented. Verify that the transposition flag for matrixbis accurately set.- 269-269: The call to
blas.dgemmfor multiplication with both matrices transposed is correct. Ensure that both transposition flags are accurately set.- 278-278: The implementation of
blas.dgemmfor matrix multiplication with addition is correctly used. Confirm that the addition flag (1.0 for beta) is correctly utilized.- 287-287: The use of
blas.dgemmfor transposed matrix multiplication with addition is appropriate. Verify that the transposition flag for matrixaand the addition flag are correctly set.- 296-296: The call to
blas.dgemmfor matrix multiplication with transposedband addition is correctly implemented. Ensure that the transposition flag for matrixband the addition flag are accurately set.- 305-305: The implementation of
blas.dgemmfor multiplication with both matrices transposed and addition is correct. Confirm that both transposition flags and the addition flag are accurately set.- 316-316: The use of
blas.daxpyfor matrix addition is correctly implemented. Verify that the performance implications of usingdaxpyover manual looping for smaller matrices are considered.blas/conversions.v (4)
- 1-1: The module declaration correctly reflects the updated module name. Confirm that this change is consistent throughout the entire codebase.
- 7-7: The import statement correctly references the updated
blas64module. Ensure that all necessary functions and types fromblas64are available and used correctly throughout the file.- 9-22: The addition of new types (
MemoryLayout,Transpose,Uplo,Diagonal,Side) is appropriate. Confirm that these types are correctly used in the context of the BLAS operations.- 24-40: The refactoring of helper functions (
c_trans,c_uplo,l_uplo,job_vlr) to work with the new types is correctly implemented. Verify that these functions are used appropriately wherever necessary.
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: fix kmeans.v (#199) Update maximum dimension checks in HDF5 file functions
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: Refactor print statement to display vector data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/ilaenv.v (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 9
lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (6)
- 27-27: The function signature for
dgetrfis clear and well-documented, indicating good maintainability and readability.- 30-38: Ensure that the error messages for
panicare descriptive enough to help users understand the cause of the error. It's recommended to include more context in the error messages.- 52-52: The use of
ilaenvto determine the block size (nb) is a good practice as it allows for algorithm tuning based on the specific characteristics of the computation.- 54-57: The conditional logic to choose between the blocked and unblocked algorithm based on
nbis clear and follows best practices for performance optimization.- 59-78: The loop to process matrix blocks is logically sound. However, consider adding comments within the loop to explain the purpose of each major step for better readability and maintainability.
- 74-75: Using
unsafeto create a slice may lead to potential issues if not handled carefully. Ensure that the bounds are correctly calculated to prevent out-of-bounds access.lapack/lapack64/ilaenv.v (3)
- 22-22: The function signature for
ilaenvis clear and well-documented, indicating good maintainability and readability.- 24-28: The initial checks for
snameandcnamebased on the first character ofnameare a good practice for early validation of input parameters.- 245-245: Ensure that the
minfunction is defined and correctly calculates the minimum ofn1andn2. This line assumes the existence of such a function, which is crucial for the correct operation ofilaenv.
| match ispec { | ||
| 1 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF', 'TRI' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'PO' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY', 'HE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| 'TRD', 'GST' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| 'G', 'M' { | ||
| match c3[1..] { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'GB', 'PB' { | ||
| // Assuming n4 and n2 are defined elsewhere in your code | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| // Replace `n4` and `n2` with actual variables | ||
| if sname { | ||
| // if n4 <= 64 { | ||
| // return 1 | ||
| // } | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| // if n4 <= 64 { | ||
| // return 1 | ||
| // } | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'PT', 'TR', 'LA' { | ||
| // Additional cases as per your original logic | ||
| } | ||
| 'ST' { | ||
| if sname && c3 == 'EBZ' { | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 2 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD', 'TRI' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 8 | ||
| } | ||
| return 8 | ||
| } | ||
| 'TRD' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'HE' { | ||
| if c3 == 'TRD' { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| if !sname { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| 'G', 'M' { | ||
| match c4 { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 3 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY', 'HE' { | ||
| if c3 == 'TRD' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| 'G' { | ||
| match c4 { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 4 { | ||
| // Used by xHSEQR | ||
| return 6 | ||
| } | ||
| 5 { | ||
| // Not used | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| 6 { | ||
| // Used by xGELSS and xGESVD | ||
| // Assuming n1 and n2 are defined elsewhere in your code | ||
| // Replace `min(n1, n2)` with actual min calculation or function | ||
| return int(f64(min(n1, n2)) * 1.6) | ||
| } | ||
| 7 { | ||
| // Not used | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| 8 { | ||
| // Used by xHSEQR | ||
| return 50 | ||
| } | ||
| 9 { | ||
| // Used by xGELSD and xGESDD | ||
| return 25 | ||
| } | ||
| 10, 11 { | ||
| // Go guarantees ieee | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 { | ||
| // dhseqr and related functions for eigenvalue problems. | ||
| return iparmq(ispec, name, opts, n1, n2, n3, n4) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_ispec) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The extensive use of match statements for algorithm tuning parameter selection is logically sound. However, consider refactoring to reduce the complexity and improve maintainability. Extracting repeated logic into separate functions or using a data-driven approach could be beneficial.
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: Run CI again
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: Run CI again Add more missing `pub` modifiers to public struct fields Add `pub` access modifier to publicly used struct fields (#200)
| info := C.LAPACKE_dgesvd(.row_major, jobu, jobvt, m, n, &a[0], lda, &s[0], &u[0], | ||
| ldu, &vt[0], ldvt, &superb[0]) | ||
| if info != 0 { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('lapack failed', .efailed) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving error handling in dgesvd. Instead of panicking, it might be better to return an error to the caller, allowing them to decide how to handle it.
| lapack64.dgetrf(m, n, mut a, lda, ipiv) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving error handling in dgetrf to return errors instead of panicking, providing more flexibility to the caller.
| unsafe { | ||
| info := C.LAPACKE_dpotrf(.row_major, blas.l_uplo(up), n, &a[0], lda) | ||
| if info != 0 { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('lapack failed', .efailed) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving error handling in dpotrf to return errors instead of panicking, providing more flexibility to the caller.
| info := C.LAPACKE_dgeev(.row_major, &char(blas.job_vlr(calc_vl).str().str), &char(blas.job_vlr(calc_vr).str().str), | ||
| n, &a[0], lda, &wr[0], &wi[0], &vvl, ldvl, &vvr, ldvr) | ||
| if info != 0 { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('lapack failed', .efailed) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving error handling in dgeev to return errors instead of panicking, providing more flexibility to the caller.
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: refactor: Update create_image_2d function to use local variable for format Update lint.yml Update lint.yml refactor: update README.md to include link to examples folder refactor: update README.md to include link to examples folder fix error in examples/vcl_opencl_fractals_one_argument/main.v (fix main V CI) refactor: Update image creation functions to use generic 'image' instead of 'image_2d' refactor: Update image creation functions to use generic 'image' instead of 'image_2d' refactor: Update create_image_2d function to use local variable for format chore: Add output image to README chore: Remove unused plot examples using script mode refactor: Update AC signal calculation to include amplitude parameter chore: Update plot examples with axis titles and script mode 1 basic plotting example with axis titles and 3 more ones using script mode (#205) remove unused `math` import, run `v fmt -w .`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/errors.v (1 hunks)
- lapack/lapack64/ilaenv.v (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- lapack/lapack64/errors.v
Additional comments not posted (3)
lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1)
1-56: The implementation ofdgesvfunction is robust and well-documented, providing clear error handling and utilizing efficient linear algebra routines.lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v (1)
1-67: Thedgetrsfunction is correctly implemented with comprehensive error handling and efficient use of BLAS routines for solving linear equations.lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1)
1-88: Thedgetrffunction is well-implemented with robust error handling and efficient use of blocked and unblocked algorithms for LU decomposition.
| module lapack64 | ||
|
|
||
| // ilaenv returns algorithm tuning parameters for the algorithm given by the | ||
| // input string. ispec specifies the parameter to return: | ||
| // | ||
| // 1: The optimal block size for a blocked algorithm. | ||
| // 2: The minimum block size for a blocked algorithm. | ||
| // 3: The block size of unprocessed data at which a blocked algorithm should | ||
| // crossover to an unblocked version. | ||
| // 4: The number of shifts. | ||
| // 5: The minimum column dimension for blocking to be used. | ||
| // 6: The crossover point for SVD (to use QR factorization or not). | ||
| // 7: The number of processors. | ||
| // 8: The crossover point for multi-shift in QR and QZ methods for non-symmetric eigenvalue problems. | ||
| // 9: Maximum size of the subproblems in divide-and-conquer algorithms. | ||
| // 10: ieee infinity and NaN arithmetic can be trusted not to trap. | ||
| // 11: ieee infinity arithmetic can be trusted not to trap. | ||
| // 12...16: parameters for Dhseqr and related functions. See Iparmq for more | ||
| // information. | ||
| // | ||
| // ilaenv is an internal routine. It is exported for testing purposes. | ||
| fn ilaenv(ispec int, name string, opts string, n1 int, n2 int, n3 int, n4 int) int { | ||
| // TODO(btracey): Replace this with a constant lookup? A list of constants? | ||
| sname := name[0] == `S` || name[0] == `D` | ||
| cname := name[0] == `C` || name[0] == `Z` | ||
| if !sname && !cname { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c2 := name[1..3] | ||
| c3 := name[3..6] | ||
| c4 := c3[1..3] | ||
|
|
||
| match ispec { | ||
| 1 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF', 'TRI' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'PO' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY', 'HE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| return 64 | ||
| } | ||
| 'TRD', 'GST' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| `G`, `M` { | ||
| match c3[1..] { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'GB', 'PB' { | ||
| // Assuming n4 and n2 are defined elsewhere in your code | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| // Replace `n4` and `n2` with actual variables | ||
| if sname { | ||
| // if n4 <= 64 { | ||
| // return 1 | ||
| // } | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| // if n4 <= 64 { | ||
| // return 1 | ||
| // } | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'PT', 'TR', 'LA' { | ||
| // Additional cases as per your original logic | ||
| } | ||
| 'ST' { | ||
| if sname && c3 == 'EBZ' { | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 2 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD', 'TRI' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'TRF' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 8 | ||
| } | ||
| return 8 | ||
| } | ||
| 'TRD' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'HE' { | ||
| if c3 == 'TRD' { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| if !sname { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| `G`, `M` { | ||
| match c4 { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 3 { | ||
| match c2 { | ||
| 'GE' { | ||
| match c3 { | ||
| 'QRF', 'RQF', 'LQF', 'QLF', 'HRD', 'BRD' { | ||
| if sname { | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 'SY', 'HE' { | ||
| if c3 == 'TRD' { | ||
| return 32 | ||
| } | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| 'OR', 'UN' { | ||
| match c3[0] { | ||
| `G` { | ||
| match c4 { | ||
| 'QR', 'RQ', 'LQ', 'QL', 'HR', 'TR', 'BR' { | ||
| return 128 | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 4 { | ||
| // Used by xHSEQR | ||
| return 6 | ||
| } | ||
| 5 { | ||
| // Not used | ||
| return 2 | ||
| } | ||
| 6 { | ||
| // Used by xGELSS and xGESVD | ||
| // Assuming n1 and n2 are defined elsewhere in your code | ||
| // Replace `min(n1, n2)` with actual min calculation or function | ||
| return int(f64(min(n1, n2)) * 1.6) | ||
| } | ||
| 7 { | ||
| // Not used | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| 8 { | ||
| // Used by xHSEQR | ||
| return 50 | ||
| } | ||
| 9 { | ||
| // Used by xGELSD and xGESDD | ||
| return 25 | ||
| } | ||
| 10, 11 { | ||
| // Go guarantees ieee | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 { | ||
| // dhseqr and related functions for eigenvalue problems. | ||
| return iparmq(ispec, name, opts, n1, n2, n3, n4) | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| panic(bad_ispec) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return 0 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring the ilaenv function to reduce complexity and improve maintainability. Extracting repeated logic into separate functions or using a data-driven approach could be beneficial.
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl:
fix: use unsafe{} to avoid warning for examples/vcl_opencl_fractals_one_argument/main.v
tests: reduce the flakyness due to the test folders already existing, of the other _test.v files as well
tests: reduce the flakyness of vsl/inout/h5/readhdf5_test.v
fix: remove flaky assert (allow for running `v ~/.vmodules/vsl/inout/h5/readhdf5_test.v` directly)
ci: add Ubuntu 20.04 to CI workflow matrix
ci: update Ubuntu version to 24.04 in CI workflow
chore: Rerun CI
fix(vcl): param size (#222)
chore: fix notices and warnings in the tests
ci: update to actions/checkout@v4
run `v fmt -w ~/.vmodules/vsl` with v fmt from vlang/v#22232
chore: use `// vfmt off` and `// vfmt on` pairs, to avoid a bug in vfmt, triggered in float/float64/gemv_test.v
run `v fmt -w .` again
restore la/matrix_ops.v
fix reference passed to non-reference (needed for vlang/v#22194) (#220)
fix notice for poly/poly.v
run `v fmt -w .` again
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
71-73: Step name is misleading & duplicates previous runThe label “Pure V Backend with Pure C Backend” sounds contradictory and does not clearly indicate that both
--use-cblasand--use-lapackeare enabled.
We already have the previous step (line 68-70) that runs with--use-cblas; this new step executes almost the same tests again plus LAPACKE. Consider either:
- Folding the two variants into a small matrix (
{ cblas , cblas+lapacke }) to avoid copy-paste duplication, or- Renaming the step to something explicit, e.g. “Execute Tests ‑ CBLAS + LAPACKE”.
- - name: Execute Tests using Pure V Backend with Pure C Backend + - name: Execute Tests using Pure V Backend – CBLAS + LAPACKE
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
114-119: macOS “Pure V Backend” tests are commented out – verify before mergeDisabling the vanilla backend on macOS reduces coverage and could conceal platform-specific regressions.
If this is only temporary (per previous comment “will revert … after testing”), please either:- # - name: Execute Tests using Pure V Backend - # run: ~/.vmodules/vsl/bin/test + - name: Execute Tests using Pure V Backend + run: ~/.vmodules/vsl/bin/testor document in the PR description why the step is permanently removed.
Leaving TODO-style comments in the workflow can confuse future maintainers and reviewers.
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: (22 commits) Match DeviceType to cl.h values (#227) refactor: Move geometry examples to main examples directory fix: remove deprecated Ubuntu 20.04 from CI workflow feat: Add dependency installation step to V Lint workflow refactor: Separate V linting and MegaLinter workflows feat: Add optimized MegaLinter configuration fix: update Bessel function visibility to public in mod_bessel.v docs: mark VCL OpenCL example as ignore docs: mark plot configuration examples as ignore docs: fix API usage and missing variables in core examples fix: resolve line length violations in markdown files Fix markdown line length issues in major README files format: clean up comments and improve code readability in examples Enhance geometry playground and spatial binning examples Add comprehensive geometry examples for vsl.gm module plot: enhance HTML output for JSON export examples with improved formatting plot: format and clean up JSON export examples plot: add advanced JSON export example plot: implement JSON export methods for issue #179 plot: improve annotation arrow suppression with multi-layer approach ...
🦙 MegaLinter status: ❌ ERROR
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
|
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl: fix: remove examples directory during documentation build process docs: remove outdated "What's New" section from README.md docs: update README.md with latest plotting enhancements and examples docs: remove examples and API reference sections from README.md docs: remove outdated "What's New" section and improve formatting in README.md fix: correct newline omission at end of README.md fix: resolve markdown formatting errors docs: comprehensive README update for VSL plot module Refactor and enhance plotting examples and structures feat: add Phase 2 advanced chart type examples feat: add Phase 2 advanced plot types support feat: add Candlestick, Funnel, and Radar plot examples feat: add Sunburst and Treemap plot examples feat: add Violin and Waterfall plot examples feat: add Line, Box, and Contour plot examples feat: add Phase 1 core plot types support
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md (2)
25-26: Use the official “macOS” spelling for the platform nameTiny style fix to keep documentation professional and consistent.
- - Platform-specific: `lapack_macos.c.v`, `lapack_default.c.v` + - Platform-specific: `lapack_macos.c.v`, `lapack_default.c.v` <!-- macOS is the official branding -->
572-580: Clarify doc-string guideline referenceMentioning “Docstrings for all public functions” is great; add a link to the project’s CONTRIBUTING or V style guide so new contributors know the exact expectations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.gitignore(1 hunks)IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
[style] ~3-~3: Some style guides suggest that commas should set off the year in a month-day-year date.
Context: ...lementation Plan Date: January 27, 2025 Purpose: Comprehensive plan to im...
(MISSING_COMMA_AFTER_YEAR)
[grammar] ~25-~25: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”.
Context: ...ackend disabled) - Platform-specific: lapack_macos.c.v, lapack_default.c.v ### Referen...
(MAC_OS)
[style] ~374-~374: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...EMM - [ ] Recursive algorithms: For very large matrices - [ ] **Memory hierarchy aware...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
[grammar] ~506-~506: A determiner may be missing.
Context: ...ance - [ ] Optimization techniques: Getting best performance - [ ] Memory management...
(THE_SUPERLATIVE)
[misspelling] ~561-~561: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...sage - [ ] Good parallel performance on multi-core systems ### Quality Requirements - [ ...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CORE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
| - **Command**: `cd /home/ulisesjcf/.vmodules && v -d vsl_lapack_lapacke -d vsl_blas_cblas test ./vsl` | ||
| - **Current Status**: All 56 tests passing ✅ | ||
| - **Coverage**: Basic functionality tested, but many functions missing comprehensive tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid hard-coded absolute paths that leak developer machines
/home/ulisesjcf/.vmodules is user-specific and will break for every other contributor or CI runner. Switch to a project-relative path or rely on $VPATH / environment variables.
- - **Command**: `cd /home/ulisesjcf/.vmodules && v -d vsl_lapack_lapacke -d vsl_blas_cblas test ./vsl`
+ - **Command**: `v -d vsl_lapack_lapacke -d vsl_blas_cblas test ./vsl`[security/PII]
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - **Command**: `cd /home/ulisesjcf/.vmodules && v -d vsl_lapack_lapacke -d vsl_blas_cblas test ./vsl` | |
| - **Current Status**: All 56 tests passing ✅ | |
| - **Coverage**: Basic functionality tested, but many functions missing comprehensive tests | |
| - **Command**: `v -d vsl_lapack_lapacke -d vsl_blas_cblas test ./vsl` | |
| - **Current Status**: All 56 tests passing ✅ | |
| - **Coverage**: Basic functionality tested, but many functions missing comprehensive tests |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md around lines 33 to 35, the command uses a hard-coded
absolute path '/home/ulisesjcf/.vmodules' which is user-specific and not
portable. Replace this absolute path with a project-relative path or use
environment variables like $VPATH to make the command work across different
developer machines and CI environments without leaking personal information.
- Updated LAPACKE_dsyev function signature to remove unnecessary parameters. - Added QR, LQ, and LU factorization functions for both single and double precision. - Introduced wrappers for LAPACK functions to handle flat array interfaces for dgesv, dgesvd, dgetrf, dgetri, geev, syev, geqrf, and orgqr. - Improved error handling for LAPACK function calls. - Enhanced matrix operations by adding support for symmetric eigenvalue problems and singular value decomposition. - Ensured proper memory management and data copying between flat and 2D array representations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
240-240: Centralize error handling to improve maintainability.The error handling pattern is repeated across all wrapper functions. Consider implementing the centralized error handler suggested in the previous review.
Add this helper function at the beginning of the wrapper functions section:
+// handle_lapack_error centralizes LAPACK error handling +fn handle_lapack_error(info int, operation string) ! { + if info != 0 { + return errors.error('LAPACK ${operation} failed with info=${info}', .efailed) + } +}Then update all error handling calls:
-if info != 0 { - return errors.error('LAPACK dgesv failed with info=${info}', .efailed) -} +handle_lapack_error(info, 'dgesv')!Also applies to: 285-285, 335-335, 381-381, 414-414, 451-451, 491-491, 528-528, 562-562
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
208-250: Consider adding in-place variants for performance-critical applications.The current wrappers allocate new arrays and perform copying, which could impact performance for large matrices. Consider offering in-place variants that modify the input arrays directly.
For performance-critical applications, consider:
- Adding
_inplacevariants that modify input arrays directly- Documenting the performance characteristics
- Providing benchmarks to help users choose between safety and performance
Example for
gesv_inplace:// gesv_inplace - Solves AX=B in-place, modifying both a and b pub fn gesv_inplace(mut a [][]f64, mut b [][]f64) ! { // Validate dimensions... // Use existing arrays without allocation // Document that a is destroyed and b contains solution }Also applies to: 263-305
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (2)
8-8: All job type enums are properly definedWe’ve verified that SVDJob, LeftEigenVectorsJob, RightEigenVectorsJob, EigenVectorsJob, and BalanceJob are all declared as type aliases in
lapack/conversions.v, pointing to the correspondinglapack64definitions. No missing enum definitions remain.
126-126: Fix output parameter types in sgebal declaration.The
iloandihiparameters are output parameters and should be pointers.-fn C.LAPACKE_sgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f32) int +fn C.LAPACKE_sgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f32) intLikely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
|
|
||
| fn C.LAPACKE_dsyev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, jobz EigenVectorsJob, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, a &f64, lda int, w &f64) int | ||
|
|
||
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo int, ihi int, scale &f64) int |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix output parameter types in dgebal declaration.
The ilo and ihi parameters are output parameters and should be pointers.
-fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo int, ihi int, scale &f64) int
+fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f64) int📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo int, ihi int, scale &f64) int | |
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f64) int |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v at line 20, the function declaration for
C.LAPACKE_dgebal incorrectly defines the output parameters ilo and ihi as
integers instead of pointers. Change the types of ilo and ihi to pointers to int
to correctly represent them as output parameters.
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
Outdated
|
|
||
| // geev - Computes eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a general matrix | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn geev(a [][]f64, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob) !([]f64, []f64, [][]f64, [][]f64) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the parameter type for right eigenvectors.
The second parameter should be RightEigenVectorsJob instead of LeftEigenVectorsJob.
-pub fn geev(a [][]f64, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob) !([]f64, []f64, [][]f64, [][]f64) {
+pub fn geev(a [][]f64, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob) !([]f64, []f64, [][]f64, [][]f64) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub fn geev(a [][]f64, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob) !([]f64, []f64, [][]f64, [][]f64) { | |
| pub fn geev(a [][]f64, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob) !([]f64, []f64, [][]f64, [][]f64) { |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v at line 428, the second parameter of the
geev function is incorrectly typed as LeftEigenVectorsJob. Change this
parameter's type to RightEigenVectorsJob to correctly represent the right
eigenvectors job.
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
Outdated
| fn C.LAPACKE_zheevr(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, jobz EigenVectorsJob, range byte, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, a voidptr, lda int, vl f64, vu f64, il int, iu int, abstol f64, m &int, w &f64, z voidptr, ldz int, isuppz &int) int | ||
|
|
||
| // General eigenvalue problems | ||
| fn C.LAPACKE_sgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, wr &f32, wi &f32, vl &f32, ldvl int, vr &f32, ldvr int) int |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the parameter type name for right eigenvectors.
The second parameter type should be RightEigenVectorsJob instead of LeftEigenVectorsJob.
-fn C.LAPACKE_sgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, wr &f32, wi &f32, vl &f32, ldvl int, vr &f32, ldvr int) int
+fn C.LAPACKE_sgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, wr &f32, wi &f32, vl &f32, ldvl int, vr &f32, ldvr int) int📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn C.LAPACKE_sgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, wr &f32, wi &f32, vl &f32, ldvl int, vr &f32, ldvr int) int | |
| fn C.LAPACKE_sgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f32, lda int, wr &f32, wi &f32, vl &f32, ldvl int, vr &f32, ldvr int) int |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v at line 111, the second parameter type
is incorrectly set as LeftEigenVectorsJob for the right eigenvectors argument.
Change the type of the second parameter from LeftEigenVectorsJob to
RightEigenVectorsJob to correctly represent the right eigenvectors job.
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
Outdated
|
|
||
| fn C.LAPACKE_dpotrf(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, a &f64, lda int) int | ||
|
|
||
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, wr &f64, wi &f64, vl &f64, ldvl_ int, vr &f64, ldvr_ int) int |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the parameter type name for right eigenvectors.
The second parameter type should be RightEigenVectorsJob instead of LeftEigenVectorsJob.
-fn C.LAPACKE_dgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, wr &f64, wi &f64, vl &f64, ldvl_ int, vr &f64, ldvr_ int) int
+fn C.LAPACKE_dgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, wr &f64, wi &f64, vl &f64, ldvl_ int, vr &f64, ldvr_ int) int📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr LeftEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, wr &f64, wi &f64, vl &f64, ldvl_ int, vr &f64, ldvr_ int) int | |
| fn C.LAPACKE_dgeev(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, calc_vl LeftEigenVectorsJob, calc_vr RightEigenVectorsJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, wr &f64, wi &f64, vl &f64, ldvl_ int, vr &f64, ldvr_ int) int |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v at line 16, the parameter type for the
second argument is incorrectly set as LeftEigenVectorsJob but it should be
RightEigenVectorsJob. Update the type of the second parameter from
LeftEigenVectorsJob to RightEigenVectorsJob to correctly represent the
calculation of right eigenvectors.
…and operation types
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (6)
16-16: Fix the parameter type for right eigenvectors.The
calc_vrparameter should beRightEigenVectorsJobinstead ofLeftEigenVectorsJob.
20-20: Fix output parameter types in dgebal declaration.The
iloandihiparameters are output parameters and should be pointers.
111-113: Fix parameter types for right eigenvectors in geev function declarations.The
calc_vrparameter should beRightEigenVectorsJobinstead ofLeftEigenVectorsJobfor all three geev function declarations.
428-428: Fix the parameter type for right eigenvectors.The second parameter should be
RightEigenVectorsJobinstead ofLeftEigenVectorsJob.
240-241: Consider centralizing error handling to reduce code duplication.The error handling pattern is repeated throughout the module. Consider creating a centralized error handling function.
Also applies to: 285-286, 335-336, 381-382, 414-415, 451-452, 491-492, 528-529, 562-563
125-129: Inconsistent parameter types in gebal function declarations.The
dgebalfunction at line 20 hasiloandihiasintparameters, but the other precision variants correctly use&int. This inconsistency should be resolved.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
-fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo int, ihi int, scale &f64) int +fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f64) int
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
208-250: Implement robust input validation and error handling.The
gesvfunction handles matrix layout conversion and error checking well, but consider adding validation for empty matrices.Add validation for empty matrices:
pub fn gesv(mut a [][]f64, mut b [][]f64) ! { m := a.len + if m == 0 { + return errors.error('Matrix a cannot be empty', .efailed) + } n := a[0].len + if n == 0 { + return errors.error('Matrix a cannot have zero columns', .efailed) + } nrhs := b[0].len
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (5)
lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (5)
1-5: Module structure looks good.The module declaration and imports are properly structured and include the necessary dependencies.
197-203: Direct wrapper function implementation is correct.The
dgesvfunction properly handles the direct LAPACKE call with appropriate unsafe block usage.
263-305: SVD function implementation is comprehensive.The
gesvdfunction properly handles the complex SVD operation with appropriate memory management and matrix conversions.
317-347: LU factorization wrapper handles memory correctly.The
getrffunction properly manages the conversion between 2D arrays and flat arrays, with appropriate error handling.
509-572: QR factorization functions are well-implemented.The
geqrfandorgqrfunctions properly handle the QR factorization workflow with appropriate memory management and error handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
blas/blas_test.v (2)
565-565: Clarify the reason for reducing vector size.The comment mentions reducing from 10000 to 1000 to "avoid numerical precision issues" but doesn't explain what specific issues were encountered. Please provide more context.
589-593: Consider verifying more elements or using sampling.Currently only verifying the first 10 elements out of 1000. Consider either:
- Verifying all elements (might impact test performance)
- Using a sampling approach to check elements throughout the array
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
blas/blas_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/conversions.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- lapack/lapack64/conversions.v
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (5)
blas/blas_test.v (5)
20-66: Well-implemented floating-point comparison utilities.The helper functions demonstrate good practices:
- Proper NaN handling
- Relative error comparison for large values
- Correct negative stride handling in strided comparisons
68-317: Comprehensive and well-structured test data.The test cases provide excellent coverage:
- Level 1: Various vector operations with different strides and values
- Level 2: Matrix-vector operations with transpose options
- Level 3: Matrix-matrix multiplication scenarios including identity matrices
323-433: Thorough Level 1 BLAS test implementations.Excellent testing practices:
- Consistent CBLAS availability checks
- Proper array cloning before mutation operations
- Comprehensive coverage of all Level 1 operations
- Clear assertion messages
439-490: Well-implemented Level 2 BLAS tests.Good implementation details:
- Correct matrix flattening for BLAS API compatibility
- Proper handling of transpose operations
- Clear test structure with expected results
496-539: Correct Level 3 BLAS test implementation.The matrix-matrix multiplication tests are properly implemented with correct matrix flattening and comprehensive test cases.
| fn test_invalid_inputs() { | ||
| // Test that invalid inputs cause panics or proper error handling | ||
| x := [1.0, 2.0, 3.0] | ||
|
|
||
| // Test zero incx - should cause panic | ||
| // Note: We can't easily test panics in V, so we'll skip these for now | ||
| // In a real implementation, these would be checked | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or implement the invalid input tests.
This function is currently a no-op. Since the comment indicates that panic testing isn't possible in V, consider either:
- Removing this function entirely
- Implementing tests for error conditions that can be verified (if the BLAS functions return error codes)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/blas_test.v around lines 545 to 552, the test_invalid_inputs function is
currently empty and does not test any invalid input scenarios. Since panic
testing is not feasible in V, either remove this function entirely to avoid dead
code or implement tests that verify error conditions through return codes or
other means supported by the BLAS functions. Choose the approach that best fits
the current error handling capabilities of the BLAS implementation.
blas/blas_test.v
Outdated
| expected := 11.0 // 1*3 + 2*4 = 11 | ||
|
|
||
| // If result is wildly incorrect, CBLAS is not working | ||
| return math.abs(result - expected) < 1.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use consistent tolerance for CBLAS detection.
The tolerance of 1.0 is too loose for verifying CBLAS functionality. For such a simple calculation, the result should be much more precise.
Apply this diff to use the defined test tolerance:
- return math.abs(result - expected) < 1.0
+ return math.abs(result - expected) < test_tol📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return math.abs(result - expected) < 1.0 | |
| return math.abs(result - expected) < test_tol |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/blas_test.v at line 17, the tolerance used for comparing the result and
expected value is too large (1.0), which is inconsistent with the precision
needed for CBLAS detection. Replace the hardcoded tolerance 1.0 with the
predefined test tolerance constant used elsewhere in the tests to ensure
consistent and stricter precision checks.
- Updated LAPACK function wrappers to convert job parameters for SVD, LU, and eigenvalue computations to their LAPACK64 equivalents. - Introduced a new test file for LAPACK functionality, covering various linear algebra operations including: - General linear system solving (GESV) - LU factorization and matrix inversion (GETRF/GETRI) - Cholesky factorization (POTRF) - Eigenvalue problems (GEEV/SYEV) - QR factorization (GEQRF/ORGQR) - Singular value decomposition (GESVD) - Added utility functions for matrix operations, random matrix generation, and orthogonality checks. - Ensured tests validate correctness and performance against expected results with appropriate tolerances.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
blas/conversions.v (2)
223-223: Fix typo in function name.The function name has a typo - missing 'c' in 'complex'.
-pub fn print_col_major_omplex_py(m int, n int, data []complex.Complex, nfmt_r_ string, nfmt_i_ string) string { +pub fn print_col_major_complex_py(m int, n int, data []complex.Complex, nfmt_r_ string, nfmt_i_ string) string {
221-221: Fix typo in function name.There's a typo in the function name that should be corrected.
-pub fn print_col_major_omplex_py(m int, n int, data []complex.Complex, nfmt_r_ string, nfmt_i_ string) string { +pub fn print_col_major_complex_py(m int, n int, data []complex.Complex, nfmt_r_ string, nfmt_i_ string) string {
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
blas/conversions.v (2)
42-412: Add unit tests for utility functions.Utility functions for matrix operations should be covered by unit tests to verify their correctness, especially with edge cases like zero-sized matrices.
42-412: Verify unit test coverage for utility functions.The utility functions for matrix operations appear well-implemented, but based on past review feedback, unit tests are missing. These functions handle critical operations like matrix conversions, printing, and eigenvector building.
Please run the following script to verify if unit tests have been added for the utility functions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unit tests covering utility functions in blas/conversions.v # Search for test functions that might test the utility functions rg -A 5 'fn test_.*(?:slice_to_col_major|print_col_major|extract_row|extract_col|eigenvecs_build|join_complex|split_complex)' --type v # Also search for any test files that might import this module rg -l 'import.*blas' --type v | xargs rg 'fn test_' -A 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
145-162: Clarify the eigenvector parameter handling logic.The logic for handling vvl/vvr variables is unclear. Why are we saving and restoring the first elements of the vl/vr arrays? This needs documentation or simplification.
Consider adding a comment explaining this logic or simplifying it if it's not necessary for correct LAPACK operation.
blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1)
5-7: Document why set_num_threads is a no-op.The empty implementation could be confusing. Add a comment explaining why this function doesn't set thread count.
// set_num_threads sets the number of threads in BLAS +// Note: This is a no-op in the current implementation as thread configuration +// is handled by the underlying BLAS library or not supported. @[inline] pub fn set_num_threads(n int) {}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
blas/conversions.v(2 hunks)blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v(1 hunks)lapack/conversions.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(7 hunks)lapack/lapack_test.v(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
[failure] 116-116:
infix expr: cannot use int literal (right expression) as bool
[failure] 115-115:
cannot use blas64.Uplo as blas.Uplo in argument 1 to vsl.lapack.lapack64.dpotrf
[failure] 116-116:
infix expr: cannot use int literal (right expression) as bool
[failure] 115-115:
cannot use blas64.Uplo as blas.Uplo in argument 1 to vsl.lapack.lapack64.dpotrf
[failure] 116-116:
infix expr: cannot use int literal (right expression) as bool
[failure] 115-115:
cannot use blas64.Uplo as blas.Uplo in argument 1 to vsl.lapack.lapack64.dpotrf
[failure] 116-116:
infix expr: cannot use int literal (right expression) as bool
[failure] 115-115:
cannot use blas64.Uplo as blas.Uplo in argument 1 to vsl.lapack.lapack64.dpotrf
[failure] 116-116:
infix expr: cannot use int literal (right expression) as bool
[failure] 115-115:
cannot use blas64.Uplo as blas.Uplo in argument 1 to vsl.lapack.lapack64.dpotrf
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (8)
blas/conversions.v (4)
414-505: Well-structured enum conversion implementation.The explicit conversion functions properly address V's enum type system limitations and provide clean interoperability with the blas64 module. The bidirectional conversions are complete and follow a consistent pattern.
1-7: Module refactoring looks good.The module name change from
vlastoblasand the addition of theblas64import align well with the refactoring objectives. The imports are appropriate for the functionality provided.
9-40: Well-structured enum definitions with explicit values.The enum definitions are comprehensive and follow BLAS conventions with explicit integer values. The documentation comments clearly explain the purpose of each enum. This approach provides better type safety compared to implicit conversions.
413-506: Excellent implementation of type-safe enum conversions.The conversion functions are well-implemented with complete bidirectional mappings for all enum types. The use of match expressions ensures type safety and the documentation clearly explains the necessity of these functions due to V's enum type alias limitations.
Key strengths:
- Complete coverage of all enum types (MemoryLayout, Transpose, Uplo, Diagonal, Side)
- Symmetric to/from conversions for each type
- Clear, descriptive function names
- Proper error handling through match expressions
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
114-119: Fix multiple issues in dpotrf function.The function has several issues that need to be addressed:
- Incorrect error message references dgesvd instead of dpotrf
- Missing enum conversion for the uplo parameter
- Type error in the condition (comparing int with bool)
pub fn dpotrf(uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int) { - info := lapack64.dpotrf(blas.to_blas64_uplo(uplo), n, mut a, lda) - if info != 0 { - errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) + info := lapack64.dpotrf(blas.to_blas64_uplo(uplo), n, mut a, lda) + if info != 0 { + errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dpotrf failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) } }Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
lapack/lapack_test.v (1)
1-705: Excellent comprehensive test suite.The test suite is well-structured with:
- Clear utility functions for matrix operations
- Appropriate tolerance constants
- Thorough coverage of LAPACK functionality
- Good integration tests comparing different solution methods
- Proper handling of backend availability
The tests follow best practices with deterministic inputs and clear assertions.
lapack/conversions.v (1)
1-600: Well-designed LAPACK enum definitions and conversions.The module provides comprehensive strongly-typed enums for LAPACK parameters with complete bidirectional conversion functions. The implementation follows a consistent pattern and includes clear documentation explaining the necessity of these conversions due to V's enum type system.
blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1)
9-179: Clean and consistent BLAS wrapper implementation.All wrapper functions properly delegate to blas64 with appropriate enum conversions. The inline attribute ensures minimal overhead, and the implementation follows a consistent pattern throughout.
| // Uplo is used to specify whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is | ||
| pub enum Uplo { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complete the documentation for Uplo enum.
The comment is incomplete and should explain what the enum represents.
-// Uplo is used to specify whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is
+// Uplo is used to specify whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is being referenced or operated on.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Uplo is used to specify whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is | |
| pub enum Uplo { | |
| // Uplo is used to specify whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is being referenced or operated on. | |
| pub enum Uplo { |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/conversions.v around lines 23 to 24, the documentation comment for the
Uplo enum is incomplete. Expand the comment to fully explain that the Uplo enum
specifies whether the upper or lower triangle of a matrix is being referenced or
used, providing clear context on its purpose in matrix operations.
| if info != 0 { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect error message in dgeev.
The error message incorrectly references dgesvd instead of dgeev.
- errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)
+ errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgeev failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if info != 0 { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } | |
| if info != 0 { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgeev failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 165 to 167, the error
message incorrectly mentions "dgesvd" instead of "dgeev". Update the error
message string to correctly reference "dgeev" to accurately reflect the function
where the error occurred.
| if info != 0 { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect error message in dgetri.
The error message incorrectly references dgesvd instead of dgetri.
- errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)
+ errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgetri failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if info != 0 { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } | |
| if info != 0 { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgetri failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 92 to 94, the error
message incorrectly mentions "dgesvd" when it should refer to "dgetri". Update
the string in the errors.vsl_panic call to correctly state "LAPACK dgetri failed
with error code" to accurately reflect the function that failed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
blas/blas64/level1f64_test.v (1)
1-216: Define the missingtest_tolconstant.The
test_tolvariable is used extensively throughout the test file but is never defined. This will cause compilation errors.Add the missing tolerance constant at the top of the file:
+const test_tol = 1e-14 + fn test_ddot() {blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v (1)
1-78: Define the missingtest_tolconstant.Same issue as in level1 tests - the
test_tolvariable is used but not defined.Add the missing tolerance constant:
+const test_tol = 1e-14 + fn test_dgemm() {blas/blas64/level2f64_test.v (1)
1-206: Define missing constants and helper functions.The file uses
test_tolandflattenfunction which are not defined, causing compilation errors.Add the missing definitions:
+const test_tol = 1e-14 + +// Helper function to flatten 2D array to 1D for BLAS routines +fn flatten(a [][]f64) []f64 { + mut result := []f64{} + for row in a { + result << row + } + return result +} + fn test_dgemv() {
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v (1)
68-77: Remove unused helper function.The
unflattenfunction is defined but never used in the tests. Consider removing it to reduce code clutter.-// Helper function to unflatten back to 2D array (for verification) -fn unflatten(s []f64, m int, n int) [][]f64 { - mut a := [][]f64{len: m, init: []f64{len: n}} - for i in 0 .. m { - for j in 0 .. n { - a[i][j] = s[i * n + j] - } - } - return a -}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
blas/blas64/level1f64_test.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/level2f64_test.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/util.v(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- blas/blas64/util.v
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: fmt
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (6)
blas/blas64/level1f64_test.v (2)
10-31: Excellent test coverage for ddot function.The test cases comprehensively cover basic dot product operations, zero vectors, and stride-based operations. The mathematical calculations are correct and the test structure is well-designed.
73-91: No action required: idamax uses 0-based indexingThe pure V implementation in blas/blas64/level1f64.v initializes its max index at 0 (returning –1 when n == 0) and the CBLAS wrapper likewise returns a 0-based index. The tests’ expected indices (1, 3, 1) are correct.
blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v (1)
10-41: Excellent DGEMM test coverage.The test cases thoroughly cover matrix multiplication with different transpose options and scaling factors. The mathematical calculations are correct and demonstrate proper understanding of BLAS DGEMM semantics.
blas/blas64/level2f64_test.v (3)
9-43: Comprehensive DGEMV test coverage.The test cases excellently cover matrix-vector multiplication with different transpose options and scaling factors. The mathematical calculations are correct and demonstrate proper BLAS semantics.
130-158: Verify symmetric matrix handling in DSYMV tests.The test logic correctly handles symmetric matrices by using only the specified triangle (upper or lower) and applying symmetry. The mathematical calculations and expected results are accurate.
160-174: Band matrix storage format verified.The test’s
a1array correctly encodes the 2×2 matrix[2 1; 1 2]in band-storage forkl=1, ku=1, lda=3:
- Column 0 of the 3×2 band matrix is
[0, 2, 1]→ A(0,0)=B(1,0)=2, A(1,0)=B(2,0)=1- Column 1 is
[1, 2, 0]→ A(0,1)=B(0,1)=1, A(1,1)=B(1,1)=2This matches the BLAS reference formula A(i,j)=B(ku+i−j,j), so no changes are needed.
… library tolerance functions in BLAS and LAPACK tests
- Implemented dtrmm (triangular matrix-matrix multiplication) and dtrsm (triangular system solve) in the blas64 module. - Added comprehensive test cases for dtrmm and dtrsm to validate functionality against expected results. - Included a new symmetric rank-2k update function dsyr2k in the BLAS interface. - Updated the oblas and lapack interfaces to include the new BLAS functions. - Enhanced existing tests to cover various scenarios for the new and modified functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v (1)
166-174: Remove unused helper function.The
unflattenfunction is defined but never used in this test file. Consider removing it to avoid dead code.-// Helper function to unflatten back to 2D array (for verification) -fn unflatten(s []f64, m int, n int) [][]f64 { - mut a := [][]f64{len: m, init: []f64{len: n}} - for i in 0 .. m { - for j in 0 .. n { - a[i][j] = s[i * n + j] - } - } - return a -}blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (1)
5-7: Document the no-op set_num_threads function.The function is currently a no-op which might be intentional for interface compatibility, but this should be documented to avoid confusion.
-// set_num_threads sets the number of threads in BLAS +// set_num_threads sets the number of threads in BLAS +// Note: This is currently a no-op as thread control is handled by the underlying blas64 implementation @[inline] pub fn set_num_threads(n int) {}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
blas/blas64/level3f64_dsyr2k.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrmm.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrsm.v(1 hunks)blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v(1 hunks)blas/blas_test.v(1 hunks)blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrsm.v
[warning] 3-3:
module 'float64 (vsl.float.float64)' is imported but never used
🪛 GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrsm.v
[warning] 3-3:
module 'float64 (vsl.float.float64)' is imported but never used
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (10)
blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrmm.v (1)
1-217: Well-implemented triangular matrix-matrix multiplication!The implementation is comprehensive and correctly handles all combinations of parameters (side, uplo, transpose, diagonal). The column-major storage indexing is consistent throughout, and the use of
float64.scal_unitaryandfloat64.axpy_unitaryfor vector operations is appropriate.blas/blas64/level3f64_dsyr2k.v (1)
1-218: Excellent implementation of symmetric rank 2k update!The implementation correctly handles all cases for transpose and triangular storage. The optimization for alpha=0 case is well done, and the symmetric matrix property is properly maintained by only updating the specified triangular part.
blas/blas64/level3f64_test.v (1)
10-163: Comprehensive test coverage for Level 3 BLAS functions!The tests are well-structured with good coverage of different parameter combinations, edge cases, and proper use of column-major storage. The expected values appear to be correctly calculated.
blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrsm.v (1)
6-260: Well-implemented triangular solve function!The implementation correctly handles all parameter combinations and edge cases. The column-major indexing is consistent, and the logic for solving triangular systems is properly implemented for both left and right side cases.
blas/blas_test.v (2)
21-610: Excellent comprehensive test suite for BLAS operations!The test structure is well-organized with clear test cases and expected values. The tests properly handle column-major storage and cover a wide range of scenarios for Level 1, 2, and 3 BLAS operations.
629-665: Good performance test implementation!The test appropriately uses moderately sized vectors (n=1000) to verify both correctness and reasonable performance. The manual verification of results ensures the operations are working correctly even with larger data.
blas/oblas_notd_vsl_blas_cblas.v (4)
9-61: LGTM: Level 1 BLAS functions are correctly implemented.The Level 1 BLAS functions (vector operations) are properly implemented as direct wrappers to the blas64 functions. The function signatures, parameter types, and delegation are all correct.
63-172: LGTM: Level 2 BLAS functions with proper enum conversions.The Level 2 BLAS functions (matrix-vector operations) correctly use conversion functions to map enum parameters to the blas64 equivalents. The implementations follow BLAS conventions properly.
174-200: LGTM: Level 3 BLAS functions are well-structured.The Level 3 BLAS functions (matrix-matrix operations) are correctly implemented with proper enum conversions and parameter delegation. The use of
@[inline]attribute is appropriate for performance-critical BLAS operations.
1-3: Conversion utilities and enums are already available in this moduleThe
Transpose,Uplo,Diagonal, andSideenums, along with theto_blas64_*conversion functions, are defined in blas/conversions.v undermodule blas. Since your wrapper file is also declared asmodule blas, it can reference those symbols directly without any extra imports.No change needed.
| @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ | |||
| module blas64 | |||
|
|
|||
| import vsl.float.float64 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import.
The vsl.float.float64 module is imported but never used in this file.
-import vsl.float.float64📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import vsl.float.float64 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
[warning] 3-3:
module 'float64 (vsl.float.float64)' is imported but never used
🪛 GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
[warning] 3-3:
module 'float64 (vsl.float.float64)' is imported but never used
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/blas64/level3f64_dtrsm.v at line 3, the import statement for
vsl.float.float64 is unused. Remove this import line to clean up the code and
avoid unnecessary dependencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
blas/README.md (2)
14-17: Add a comma before “but” to fix the compound sentence
Minor grammar improvement—helps readability.-This backend is probably the fastest one for all platforms but it requires the installation of the OpenBLAS library. +This backend is probably the fastest one for all platforms, but it requires the installation of the OpenBLAS library.
33-42: Clarify Debian/Ubuntu note wording
“GNU Linux” is uncommon phrasing; “GNU/Linux” or simply “Linux” is clearer. Also, consider moving the “libopenblas-dev is not needed …” sentence below the command to keep the flow (description → command) consistent with the Homebrew and Arch sections.lapack/README.md (1)
16-17: Add missing comma for correct punctuationThe sentence is a compound clause and needs a comma before “but”:
-the fastest one for all platforms -but it requires the installation of the LAPACKE library. +the fastest one for all platforms, but it requires the installation of the LAPACKE library.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
blas/README.md(1 hunks)lapack/README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
blas/README.md
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Use a comma before ‘but’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...obably the fastest one for all platforms but it requires the installation of the Ope...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
lapack/README.md
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Use a comma before ‘but’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...obably the fastest one for all platforms but it requires the installation of the LAP...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
lapack/README.md
8-8: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 2; Too few cells, row will be missing data
(MD056, table-column-count)
9-9: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 3; Too few cells, row will be missing data
(MD056, table-column-count)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
| # The V Basic Linear Algebra System | ||
|
|
||
| This package implements Basic Linear Algebra System (BLAS) routines in V. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use the canonical BLAS expansion (“Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms”)
The abbreviation BLAS traditionally stands for Subprograms, not System. Using the canonical term avoids confusion for users already familiar with the library.
-# The V Basic Linear Algebra System
+# The V Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # The V Basic Linear Algebra System | |
| This package implements Basic Linear Algebra System (BLAS) routines in V. | |
| # The V Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS) | |
| This package implements Basic Linear Algebra System (BLAS) routines in V. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/README.md at lines 1 to 3, the abbreviation BLAS is incorrectly expanded
as "Basic Linear Algebra System." Change this to the canonical expansion "Basic
Linear Algebra Subprograms" to align with the standard terminology and avoid
confusion for users familiar with BLAS.
| | Backend | Description | Status | Compilation Flags | | ||
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------- | | ||
| | BLAS | Pure V implementation | WIP | `NONE` | | ||
| | LAPACKE | LAPACKE is a C interface to LAPACK. It is a standard part of the LAPACK distribution. | | ||
| | Check the section [LAPACKE Backend](#lapacke-backend) for more information. | Stable | `-d vsl_lapack_lapacke` | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix broken Markdown table rendering
Rows 8-9 have fewer columns than the header row, so the table collapses when rendered (see MD056 warnings). Merge the two LAPACKE lines into a single row with four cells:
-| LAPACKE | LAPACKE is a C interface to LAPACK. It is a standard part of the LAPACK distribution. |
-| Check the section [LAPACKE Backend](#lapacke-backend) for more information. | Stable | `-d vsl_lapack_lapacke` |
+| LAPACKE | LAPACKE is a C interface to LAPACK. Check the section [LAPACKE Backend](#lapacke-backend) for more information. | Stable | `-d vsl_lapack_lapacke` |This restores a valid 4-column layout and eliminates the linter errors.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| | Backend | Description | Status | Compilation Flags | | |
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------- | | |
| | BLAS | Pure V implementation | WIP | `NONE` | | |
| | LAPACKE | LAPACKE is a C interface to LAPACK. It is a standard part of the LAPACK distribution. | | |
| | Check the section [LAPACKE Backend](#lapacke-backend) for more information. | Stable | `-d vsl_lapack_lapacke` | | |
| | Backend | Description | Status | Compilation Flags | | |
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------- | | |
| | BLAS | Pure V implementation | WIP | `NONE` | | |
| | LAPACKE | LAPACKE is a C interface to LAPACK. Check the section [LAPACKE Backend](#lapacke-backend) for more information. | Stable | `-d vsl_lapack_lapacke` | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
8-8: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 2; Too few cells, row will be missing data
(MD056, table-column-count)
9-9: Table column count
Expected: 4; Actual: 3; Too few cells, row will be missing data
(MD056, table-column-count)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/README.md around lines 5 to 9, the Markdown table rows for LAPACKE
have fewer columns than the header, causing rendering issues. Merge the two
separate LAPACKE lines into one row with four columns: Backend, Description,
Status, and Compilation Flags. Ensure the description cell includes the full
text from both lines combined, preserving all information while maintaining the
table's column structure.
| The best way of installing OpenBLAS is using | ||
| [blas-openblas](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/). | ||
|
|
||
| ```sh | ||
| sudo pacman -S blas-openblas | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify Arch Linux instructions – package name appears wrong
The Arch section refers to OpenBLAS (blas-openblas) even though the goal is to install LAPACKE headers/libs. On Arch, LAPACKE is shipped by lapack (which itself pulls OpenBLAS). Consider replacing these lines with:
-The best way of installing OpenBLAS is using
-[blas-openblas](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/).
-
-```sh
-sudo pacman -S blas-openblas
-```
+LAPACKE headers and libraries are provided by the
+[lapack](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lapack/) package
+(which depends on OpenBLAS):
+
+```sh
+sudo pacman -S lapack
+```Please double-check the package names to avoid installation errors.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Arch package contents and dependencies via the Arch Linux website API
# 1. Check that the 'lapack' package includes the LAPACKE header
echo "Contents of lapack package (looking for lapacke.h):"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lapack/json/ | jq '.files' | grep -F "include/lapacke.h" || echo "→ lapacke.h not found in lapack"
# 2. Check that the 'blas-openblas' package does not include the LAPACKE header
echo
echo "Contents of blas-openblas package (looking for lapacke.h):"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/json/ | jq '.files' | grep -F "lapacke.h" || echo "→ lapacke.h not found in blas-openblas"
# 3. List dependencies of the lapack package to confirm it depends on a BLAS provider (OpenBLAS)
echo
echo "Dependencies of lapack package:"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lapack/json/ | jq '.depends'Length of output: 820
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Inspect OpenBLAS package details to determine LAPACKE support
echo "Description of openblas package:"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/openblas/json/ | jq '.desc'
echo
echo "Header files in openblas package:"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/openblas/json/ | jq -r '.files[]' | grep -E "usr/include/.*\.h" | head -n 20
echo
echo "Library files in openblas package:"
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/openblas/json/ | jq -r '.files[]' | grep -E "usr/lib/.*\.(so|a)" | head -n 20Length of output: 710
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Refined search for LAPACKE headers and libraries in lapack and blas-openblas Arch packages
for pkg in lapack blas-openblas; do
echo "===== Package: $pkg ====="
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/$pkg/json/ | \
jq -r '.files[]' 2>/dev/null | \
grep -E 'lapacke\.h|liblapacke'
echo
doneLength of output: 474
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify file listings via HTML pages on archlinux.org for LAPACKE content
echo "=== lapack package files (checking for lapacke headers/libs) ==="
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lapack/files/ | grep -E "/usr/include/lapacke.h|/usr/lib/liblapacke"
echo
echo "=== blas-openblas package files (checking for lapacke headers/libs) ==="
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/files/ | grep -E "/usr/include/lapacke.h|/usr/lib/liblapacke"Length of output: 552
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Correctly extract file names for lapack and blas-openblas packages to check LAPACKE content
for pkg in lapack blas-openblas; do
echo "===== Package: $pkg ====="
curl -s https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/$pkg/json/ \
| jq -r '.files[]?.name' 2>/dev/null \
| grep -E 'lapacke' || echo "→ no lapacke files in $pkg"
echo
doneLength of output: 602
Update Arch Linux installation instructions for LAPACKE
The Arch package that provides the LAPACKE headers and libraries is lapack (which pulls in OpenBLAS via the virtual blas dependency), not blas-openblas.
Files to update:
- lapack/README.md (lines 45–50)
Replace the existing snippet with:
-The best way of installing OpenBLAS is using
-[blas-openblas](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/).
-
-```sh
-sudo pacman -S blas-openblas
-```
+LAPACKE headers and libraries are provided by the
+[lapack](https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lapack/) package
+(which depends on OpenBLAS via the `blas` virtual package):
+
+```sh
+sudo pacman -S lapack
+```🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/README.md around lines 45 to 50, the Arch Linux installation
instructions incorrectly suggest installing the blas-openblas package for
LAPACKE. Update the instructions to indicate that the correct package to install
is lapack, which provides LAPACKE headers and libraries and depends on OpenBLAS
via the blas virtual package. Replace the existing snippet with a description of
the lapack package and the command "sudo pacman -S lapack".
…nvector job parameters - Removed the `is_cblas_working` function and associated checks from BLAS tests. - Updated eigenvector job parameters in LAPACK functions to correctly reflect right eigenvector computations. - Adjusted LAPACK function signatures to use `RightEigenVectorsJob` instead of `LeftEigenVectorsJob` where applicable. - Enhanced LAPACK function implementations to ensure proper handling of matrix dimensions and conversions between row-major and column-major formats. - Cleaned up test cases in `lapack_test.v` to eliminate unnecessary LAPACKE backend checks, simplifying the test flow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (2)
92-95: Fix incorrect error message in dgetri.The error message incorrectly references dgesvd instead of dgetri.
- errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) + errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgetri failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)
165-168: Fix incorrect error message in dgeev.The error message incorrectly references dgesvd instead of dgeev.
- errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) + errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgeev failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
20-20: Fix output parameter types in dgebal declaration.The
iloandihiparameters are output parameters and should be pointers.-fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo int, ihi int, scale &f64) int +fn C.LAPACKE_dgebal(matrix_layout blas.MemoryLayout, job BalanceJob, n int, a &f64, lda int, ilo &int, ihi &int, scale &f64) intblas/blas_test.v (1)
534-541: Remove or implement the invalid input tests.This function is currently a no-op. Since the comment indicates that panic testing isn't possible in V, consider either:
- Removing this function entirely
- Implementing tests for error conditions that can be verified (if the BLAS functions return error codes)
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
lapack/lapack64/dgeev.v (1)
36-39: Incomplete implementation of dgeev.The function currently only validates parameters but doesn't compute eigenvalues or eigenvectors. The placeholder comment indicates this needs to be implemented.
Would you like me to help implement the actual LAPACK calls for eigenvalue computation, or open an issue to track this task?
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
337-355: Placeholder implementation needs completion.The
geevfunction returns zero-initialized arrays instead of computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors. This needs to be implemented once the underlyingdgeevin lapack64 is completed.Would you like me to help implement this function properly once the lapack64.dgeev is complete?
blas/blas_test.v (1)
547-578: Consider expanding performance test coverage.The performance tests are well-implemented but could benefit from testing more BLAS operations and providing timing information.
Consider adding timing measurements and testing more Level 2/3 operations:
fn test_large_vectors() { + import time // Test with moderately large vectors to ensure performance is reasonable n := 1000 // Reduced from 10000 to avoid numerical precision issues mut x := []f64{len: n} mut y := []f64{len: n} // Fill with test data for i in 0 .. n { x[i] = f64(i) + 1.0 y[i] = f64(i) * 2.0 } + // Time DDOT operation + start := time.now() result := ddot(n, x, 1, y, 1) + elapsed := time.since(start) + println('DDOT on ${n} elements took: ${elapsed}') // ... rest of the test }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
blas/blas_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgeev.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_test.v(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
146-162: Clarify the vector handling logic in dgeev.The purpose of saving and restoring
vl[0]andvr[0]is unclear. If eigenvectors are not computed, the leading dimensions should be set appropriately without modifying the arrays.Can you explain why this temporary variable logic is needed? The LAPACK documentation suggests that when eigenvectors are not computed, the corresponding arrays are not referenced.
lapack/lapack_test.v (1)
1-627: Excellent test coverage!The test suite is comprehensive and well-structured with:
- Good utility functions for matrix operations
- Proper verification of mathematical properties
- Deterministic random seeds for reproducibility
- Coverage of basic and advanced LAPACK functionality
- Integration tests comparing different methods
blas/blas_test.v (3)
1-8: LGTM - Well-structured module setup.The module imports and test tolerance constant are appropriate for double-precision BLAS testing.
260-425: Excellent comprehensive BLAS test coverage.The test suite provides thorough coverage of Level 1, 2, and 3 BLAS operations with well-structured test cases and proper tolerance checking. The organization by BLAS levels makes the tests easy to understand and maintain.
28-79: All Level 1expected_dnrm2values are accurate.Verified the computed √(6²+5²+4²+2²+6²) matches the hard-coded value within 1×10⁻¹⁴ tolerance. No precision issues found—no changes needed.
| // Quick return if possible | ||
| if n == 0 { | ||
| return 0 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unreachable code.
The check for n == 0 is already handled at lines 8-10, making this code unreachable.
- // Quick return if possible
- if n == 0 {
- return 0
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Quick return if possible | |
| if n == 0 { | |
| return 0 | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack64/dgeev.v around lines 31 to 34, the check for n == 0 is
redundant because it is already handled earlier at lines 8 to 10. Remove this
unreachable code block to clean up the function and avoid unnecessary checks.
| info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) | ||
| if !info { | ||
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect error condition in dpotrf.
The condition !info is incorrect - LAPACK returns 0 on success, so this will panic on success instead of failure.
- if !info {
- errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)
+ if info != 0 {
+ errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dpotrf failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) | |
| if !info { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dgesvd failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) | |
| if info != 0 { | |
| errors.vsl_panic('LAPACK dpotrf failed with error code: ${info}', .efailed) | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 116 to 120, the error
check for the dpotrf call is incorrect because LAPACK returns 0 on success and a
positive integer on failure. Change the condition from `if !info` to `if info !=
0` to correctly detect failure and trigger the panic only when an error occurs.
| fn test_dsyr2k() { | ||
| // Test: Symmetric rank-2k update C := alpha*A*B^T + alpha*B*A^T + beta*C | ||
| // Using a simple 2x2 case, data stored in column-major order | ||
| alpha := 2.0 | ||
| beta := 0.5 | ||
|
|
||
| // A is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | ||
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [3, 4]] | ||
| // Column-major: [1, 3, 2, 4] | ||
| a := [1.0, 3.0, 2.0, 4.0] | ||
|
|
||
| // B is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | ||
| // Row-major view: [[0.5, 1], [1.5, 2]] | ||
| // Column-major: [0.5, 1.5, 1, 2] | ||
| b := [0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0] | ||
|
|
||
| // C is 2x2 symmetric matrix (column-major storage) | ||
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [2, 4]] | ||
| // Column-major: [1, 2, 2, 4] | ||
| mut c := [1.0, 2.0, 2.0, 4.0] | ||
|
|
||
| // Calculate expected result: | ||
| // A*B^T = [[1*0.5+2*1.5, 1*1.0+2*2.0], [3*0.5+4*1.5, 3*1.0+4*2.0]] = [[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] | ||
| // B*A^T = [[0.5*1+1.0*3, 0.5*2+1.0*4], [1.5*1+2.0*3, 1.5*2+2.0*4]] = [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]] | ||
| // alpha*(A*B^T + B*A^T) = 2.0*([[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] + [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]]) | ||
| // = 2.0*[[7.0, 9.5], [15.0, 22.0]] = [[14.0, 19.0], [30.0, 44.0]] | ||
| // beta*C = 0.5*[[1.0, 2.0], [2.0, 4.0]] = [[0.5, 1.0], [1.0, 2.0]] | ||
| // Final: [[14.0+0.5, 19.0+1.0], [30.0+1.0, 44.0+2.0]] = [[14.5, 20.0], [31.0, 46.0]] | ||
| // In column-major: [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] | ||
| expected := [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0] | ||
|
|
||
| dsyr2k(.upper, .no_trans, 2, 2, alpha, a, 2, b, 2, beta, mut c, 2) | ||
|
|
||
| assert float64.arrays_tolerance(c, expected, test_tol), 'DSYR2K failed: expected ${expected}, got ${c}' | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix calculation error in dsyr2k test.
There's a discrepancy between the detailed calculation in the comments and the expected result. The comments show the final result should be [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] in column-major format, but the expected array is [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0].
Please verify the calculation and update either the comments or the expected values:
- expected := [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0]
+ expected := [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0]Or alternatively, verify the calculation is correct and update the comments to match.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn test_dsyr2k() { | |
| // Test: Symmetric rank-2k update C := alpha*A*B^T + alpha*B*A^T + beta*C | |
| // Using a simple 2x2 case, data stored in column-major order | |
| alpha := 2.0 | |
| beta := 0.5 | |
| // A is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [3, 4]] | |
| // Column-major: [1, 3, 2, 4] | |
| a := [1.0, 3.0, 2.0, 4.0] | |
| // B is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[0.5, 1], [1.5, 2]] | |
| // Column-major: [0.5, 1.5, 1, 2] | |
| b := [0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0] | |
| // C is 2x2 symmetric matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [2, 4]] | |
| // Column-major: [1, 2, 2, 4] | |
| mut c := [1.0, 2.0, 2.0, 4.0] | |
| // Calculate expected result: | |
| // A*B^T = [[1*0.5+2*1.5, 1*1.0+2*2.0], [3*0.5+4*1.5, 3*1.0+4*2.0]] = [[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] | |
| // B*A^T = [[0.5*1+1.0*3, 0.5*2+1.0*4], [1.5*1+2.0*3, 1.5*2+2.0*4]] = [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]] | |
| // alpha*(A*B^T + B*A^T) = 2.0*([[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] + [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]]) | |
| // = 2.0*[[7.0, 9.5], [15.0, 22.0]] = [[14.0, 19.0], [30.0, 44.0]] | |
| // beta*C = 0.5*[[1.0, 2.0], [2.0, 4.0]] = [[0.5, 1.0], [1.0, 2.0]] | |
| // Final: [[14.0+0.5, 19.0+1.0], [30.0+1.0, 44.0+2.0]] = [[14.5, 20.0], [31.0, 46.0]] | |
| // In column-major: [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] | |
| expected := [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0] | |
| dsyr2k(.upper, .no_trans, 2, 2, alpha, a, 2, b, 2, beta, mut c, 2) | |
| assert float64.arrays_tolerance(c, expected, test_tol), 'DSYR2K failed: expected ${expected}, got ${c}' | |
| } | |
| fn test_dsyr2k() { | |
| // Test: Symmetric rank-2k update C := alpha*A*B^T + alpha*B*A^T + beta*C | |
| // Using a simple 2x2 case, data stored in column-major order | |
| alpha := 2.0 | |
| beta := 0.5 | |
| // A is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [3, 4]] | |
| // Column-major: [1, 3, 2, 4] | |
| a := [1.0, 3.0, 2.0, 4.0] | |
| // B is 2x2 matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[0.5, 1], [1.5, 2]] | |
| // Column-major: [0.5, 1.5, 1, 2] | |
| b := [0.5, 1.5, 1.0, 2.0] | |
| // C is 2x2 symmetric matrix (column-major storage) | |
| // Row-major view: [[1, 2], [2, 4]] | |
| // Column-major: [1, 2, 2, 4] | |
| mut c := [1.0, 2.0, 2.0, 4.0] | |
| // Calculate expected result: | |
| // A*B^T = [[1*0.5+2*1.5, 1*1.0+2*2.0], [3*0.5+4*1.5, 3*1.0+4*2.0]] = [[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] | |
| // B*A^T = [[0.5*1+1.0*3, 0.5*2+1.0*4], [1.5*1+2.0*3, 1.5*2+2.0*4]] = [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]] | |
| // alpha*(A*B^T + B*A^T) = 2.0*([[3.5, 5.0], [7.5, 11.0]] + [[3.5, 4.5], [7.5, 11.0]]) | |
| // = 2.0*[[7.0, 9.5], [15.0, 22.0]] = [[14.0, 19.0], [30.0, 44.0]] | |
| // beta*C = 0.5*[[1.0, 2.0], [2.0, 4.0]] = [[0.5, 1.0], [1.0, 2.0]] | |
| // Final: [[14.0+0.5, 19.0+1.0], [30.0+1.0, 44.0+2.0]] = [[14.5, 20.0], [31.0, 46.0]] | |
| // In column-major: [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] | |
| - expected := [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0] | |
| + expected := [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] | |
| dsyr2k(.upper, .no_trans, 2, 2, alpha, a, 2, b, 2, beta, mut c, 2) | |
| assert float64.arrays_tolerance(c, expected, test_tol), 'DSYR2K failed: expected ${expected}, got ${c}' | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In blas/blas_test.v around lines 494 to 528, the expected result array for the
dsyr2k test does not match the detailed calculation in the comments. The
comments calculate the final matrix as [14.5, 31.0, 20.0, 46.0] in column-major
order, but the expected array is [20.5, 29.0, 2.0, 42.0]. Review the matrix
multiplication and addition steps to confirm the correct final values, then
update the expected array to match the correct calculation or adjust the
comments to reflect the actual expected result used in the test.
- Updated LAPACK function signatures to return error codes instead of panicking. - Introduced standardized wrapper functions for LAPACK operations, improving consistency across the API. - Added detailed error handling in high-level wrapper functions for matrix operations. - Removed redundant code and improved matrix conversion logic in wrapper functions. - Cleaned up test files by removing unnecessary whitespace and ensuring consistency in test structure. - Created a new file for LAPACK wrapper functions to separate concerns and enhance maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
lapack/lapack_wrappers.v (3)
88-93: Critical: Incorrect matrix storage order in getrf.The matrix is flattened in row-major order but LAPACK expects column-major.
174-178: Critical: Incorrect matrix storage order in potrf.The matrix is flattened in row-major order but LAPACK expects column-major.
210-214: Critical: Incorrect matrix storage order in geqrf.The matrix is flattened in row-major order but LAPACK expects column-major.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v (1)
54-63: Consider returning more detailed error information.The current implementation returns a generic error code of 1 for singularity. LAPACK's dgetrf typically returns the index of the first zero pivot, which would be more informative for debugging.
Consider modifying dgetrf to return the pivot index where singularity was detected, allowing this function to propagate that information to callers.
lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v (1)
78-82: Remove duplicate comment.The comment "apply interchanges to columns 1..j-1" is duplicated from line 74.
Apply this diff to fix the comment:
if j + jb < n { - // apply interchanges to columns 1..j-1. + // apply interchanges to columns j+jb..n-1. mut slice2 := unsafe { a[j + jb..] }lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
155-155: Optimize work array allocation for better performance.The current implementation allocates work arrays with minimal size calculations. Consider implementing optimal work size queries for better performance, as recommended by LAPACK documentation.
For functions like
dsyev, the optimal work size can be determined by calling the function withlwork = -1:pub fn dsyev(jobz EigenVectorsJob, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut w []f64) int { - mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, 3 * n - 1)} + // Query optimal work size + mut work_query := []f64{len: 1} + lapack64.dsyev(to_lapack64_eigen_vectors_job(jobz), uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w, mut work_query, -1) + optimal_lwork := int(work_query[0]) + mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, optimal_lwork)} lapack64.dsyev(to_lapack64_eigen_vectors_job(jobz), uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w, mut work, work.len) return 0 }Also applies to: 179-179, 188-188, 205-205
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
lapack/lapack64/dgesv.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetf2.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_wrappers.v(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- lapack/lapack_test.v
- lapack/lapack_d_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (1)
163-167: Ignore return value consistency concern in dgeev_standardizedUpon inspection, both the direct
dgeevwrapper and thedgeev_standardizedwrapper rely onlapack64.dgeevreturning aninterror code. The explicit check indgeev_standardized:info := lapack64.dgeev(...) return if info == 0 { 0 } else { info }is functionally identical to returning
infodirectly, so there’s no inconsistency between the two wrappers. No changes are required.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| // A * X = B if trans == blas.Trans | ||
| // Aᵀ * X = B if trans == blas.NoTrans |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix transpose documentation - the logic appears reversed.
The documentation states that A * X = B if trans == blas.Trans, but typically in BLAS/LAPACK conventions, NoTrans means solve A * X = B and Trans means solve A^T * X = B.
Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
-// A * X = B if trans == blas.Trans
-// Aᵀ * X = B if trans == blas.NoTrans
+// A * X = B if trans == blas.NoTrans
+// Aᵀ * X = B if trans == blas.Trans📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // A * X = B if trans == blas.Trans | |
| // Aᵀ * X = B if trans == blas.NoTrans | |
| // A * X = B if trans == blas.NoTrans | |
| // Aᵀ * X = B if trans == blas.Trans |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v around lines 9 to 10, the transpose documentation is
reversed. Update the comments to correctly state that A * X = B when trans ==
blas.NoTrans, and Aᵀ * X = B when trans == blas.Trans, aligning with standard
BLAS/LAPACK conventions.
| if ldb < math.max(1, nrhs) { | ||
| panic(bad_ld_b) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect validation for leading dimension of B.
The check for ldb should compare against the number of columns in B (nrhs), not rows.
Apply this diff to fix the validation:
-if ldb < math.max(1, nrhs) {
+if ldb < math.max(1, n) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ldb < math.max(1, nrhs) { | |
| panic(bad_ld_b) | |
| } | |
| if ldb < math.max(1, n) { | |
| panic(bad_ld_b) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack64/dgetrs.v around lines 32 to 34, the validation for the
leading dimension ldb incorrectly compares ldb with the maximum of 1 and nrhs
(number of right-hand sides). The correct check should compare ldb against the
number of rows of B, which is n, not nrhs. Update the condition to panic if ldb
is less than max(1, n) instead of max(1, nrhs).
| } else if lda < math.max(1, n) { | ||
| panic(bad_ld_a) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix leading dimension validation.
For column-major storage, lda should be at least m, not n.
Apply this diff to fix the validation:
-} else if lda < math.max(1, n) {
+} else if lda < math.max(1, m) {🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack64/dgetf2.v around lines 12 to 14, the leading dimension
validation incorrectly checks if lda is at least max(1, n), but for column-major
storage lda must be at least max(1, m). Change the condition to compare lda with
max(1, m) instead of max(1, n) to correctly validate the leading dimension.
| import math | ||
| import vsl.blas | ||
|
|
||
| pub fn dgetf2(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int) bool { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add function documentation.
The function lacks documentation explaining its purpose and parameters.
Add documentation before the function:
+// dgetf2 computes an LU factorization of a general m×n matrix A using
+// partial pivoting with row interchanges (unblocked algorithm).
+//
+// The factorization has the form
+// A = P * L * U
+// where P is a permutation matrix, L is lower triangular with unit
+// diagonal elements (lower trapezoidal if m > n), and U is upper
+// triangular (upper trapezoidal if m < n).
+//
+// This is the unblocked version of the algorithm, suitable for small matrices.
pub fn dgetf2(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int) bool {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub fn dgetf2(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int) bool { | |
| // dgetf2 computes an LU factorization of a general m×n matrix A using | |
| // partial pivoting with row interchanges (unblocked algorithm). | |
| // | |
| // The factorization has the form | |
| // A = P * L * U | |
| // where P is a permutation matrix, L is lower triangular with unit | |
| // diagonal elements (lower trapezoidal if m > n), and U is upper | |
| // triangular (upper trapezoidal if m < n). | |
| // | |
| // This is the unblocked version of the algorithm, suitable for small matrices. | |
| pub fn dgetf2(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int) bool { |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack64/dgetf2.v at line 6, the function dgetf2 lacks documentation.
Add a comment block above the function definition describing its purpose, the
meaning of each parameter (m, n, a, lda, ipiv), and what the function returns.
This will improve code readability and maintainability.
| // Convert A from row-major to flat array | ||
| for i in 0 .. n { | ||
| for j in 0 .. n { | ||
| a_flat[i * n + j] = a[i][j] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Convert B from row-major to flat array (row-major storage) | ||
| for i in 0 .. n { | ||
| for j in 0 .. nrhs { | ||
| b_flat[i * nrhs + j] = b[i][j] | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Incorrect matrix storage order for LAPACK.
The code flattens matrices in row-major order, but LAPACK expects column-major order. This will produce incorrect results.
Apply this diff to fix the storage order:
// Convert A from row-major to flat array
for i in 0 .. n {
for j in 0 .. n {
- a_flat[i * n + j] = a[i][j]
+ a_flat[j * n + i] = a[i][j] // Column-major: column j, row i
}
}
// Convert B from row-major to flat array (row-major storage)
for i in 0 .. n {
for j in 0 .. nrhs {
- b_flat[i * nrhs + j] = b[i][j]
+ b_flat[j * n + i] = b[i][j] // Column-major storage
}
}Also update the reverse conversion:
// Convert result back to row-major 2D arrays
for i in 0 .. n {
for j in 0 .. n {
- a[i][j] = a_flat[i * n + j]
+ a[i][j] = a_flat[j * n + i]
}
}
for i in 0 .. n {
for j in 0 .. nrhs {
- b[i][j] = b_flat[i * nrhs + j]
+ b[i][j] = b_flat[j * n + i]
}
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_wrappers.v around lines 40 to 52, the matrices A and B are
flattened using row-major order, but LAPACK requires column-major order. To fix
this, change the indexing in the loops so that elements are stored column-wise:
for A, assign a_flat[j * n + i] = a[i][j], and for B, assign b_flat[j * nrhs +
i] = b[i][j]. Additionally, update the code that converts the flat arrays back
to 2D matrices to use column-major order indexing accordingly.
| // dgeqrf_standardized - Standardized dgeqrf wrapper (placeholder until implemented) | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dgeqrf_standardized(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int { | ||
| // Placeholder - not implemented in lapack64 yet | ||
| return -1 // Indicate not implemented | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve placeholder function implementation.
The placeholder functions for dgeqrf return -1 to indicate "not implemented". Consider using a more robust approach such as:
- Returning a proper LAPACK error code
- Using a panic with a descriptive message
- Implementing a feature flag system
-pub fn dgeqrf_standardized(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int {
- // Placeholder - not implemented in lapack64 yet
- return -1 // Indicate not implemented
-}
+pub fn dgeqrf_standardized(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int {
+ errors.vsl_panic('dgeqrf is not yet implemented in lapack64 backend', .efailed)
+}-pub fn dgeqrf(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int {
- // dgeqrf is not implemented in lapack64 yet
- return -1 // Indicate not implemented
-}
+pub fn dgeqrf(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int {
+ errors.vsl_panic('dgeqrf is not yet implemented in lapack64 backend', .efailed)
+}Also applies to: 194-199
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 169 to 174 and 194 to
199, the placeholder functions for dgeqrf return -1 to indicate "not
implemented," which is not robust. Replace the return value with either a proper
LAPACK error code that clearly signals the function is unimplemented or use a
panic with a descriptive message explaining the function is not yet implemented.
Alternatively, implement a feature flag system to conditionally enable or
disable these placeholders. This will improve error handling and clarity.
| // dorgqr_standardized - Standardized dorgqr wrapper | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dorgqr_standardized(m int, n int, k int, mut a []f64, lda int, tau []f64) int { | ||
| mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, n)} | ||
| lapack64.dorgqr(m, n, k, mut a, lda, tau, mut work, work.len) | ||
| return 0 // lapack64.dorgqr doesn't return error code | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate duplicate dorgqr implementations.
Both dorgqr_standardized and dorgqr have identical implementations with the same work array management logic. This creates maintenance overhead and potential for inconsistency.
Consider implementing one function that calls the other:
pub fn dorgqr_standardized(m int, n int, k int, mut a []f64, lda int, tau []f64) int {
- mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, n)}
- lapack64.dorgqr(m, n, k, mut a, lda, tau, mut work, work.len)
- return 0 // lapack64.dorgqr doesn't return error code
+ return dorgqr(m, n, k, mut a, lda, tau)
}Also applies to: 201-208
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 176 to 182 and also 201
to 208, the functions dorgqr_standardized and dorgqr have duplicate
implementations including the work array setup. To fix this, consolidate by
implementing only one of these functions with the full logic and have the other
function simply call it, passing through all parameters. This reduces
maintenance overhead and ensures consistency.
| // dsyev_standardized - Standardized dsyev wrapper | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dsyev_standardized(jobz EigenVectorsJob, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut w []f64) int { | ||
| mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, 3 * n - 1)} | ||
| lapack64.dsyev(to_lapack64_eigen_vectors_job(jobz), uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w, mut | ||
| work, work.len) | ||
| return 0 // lapack64 functions don't return error codes | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate duplicate dsyev implementations.
Both dsyev_standardized and dsyev have identical implementations with the same work array management logic. This creates maintenance overhead and potential for inconsistency.
Consider implementing one function that calls the other:
pub fn dsyev_standardized(jobz EigenVectorsJob, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut w []f64) int {
- mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, 3 * n - 1)}
- lapack64.dsyev(to_lapack64_eigen_vectors_job(jobz), uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w, mut
- work, work.len)
- return 0 // lapack64 functions don't return error codes
+ return dsyev(jobz, uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w)
}Also applies to: 184-192
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 152 to 159 and similarly
at lines 184 to 192, the functions dsyev_standardized and dsyev have duplicate
implementations including identical work array management. To fix this, refactor
by consolidating these two functions into one core implementation and have the
other function call it, eliminating duplicate code and reducing maintenance
overhead.
| // | ||
| // NOTE: matrix 'a' will be modified | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dgesv(n int, nrhs int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int, mut b []f64, ldb int) int { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for critical parameters.
The wrapper functions lack input validation for critical parameters like matrix dimensions, leading dimensions, and array lengths. This could lead to undefined behavior or segmentation faults.
Consider adding validation for key parameters:
pub fn dgesv(n int, nrhs int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int, mut b []f64, ldb int) int {
+ if n < 0 || nrhs < 0 || lda < math.max(1, n) || ldb < math.max(1, n) {
+ errors.vsl_panic('Invalid matrix dimensions in dgesv', .efailed)
+ }
+ if a.len < lda * n || b.len < ldb * nrhs || ipiv.len < n {
+ errors.vsl_panic('Insufficient array lengths in dgesv', .efailed)
+ }
return lapack64.dgesv(n, nrhs, mut a, lda, mut ipiv, mut b, ldb)
}Also applies to: 76-76, 89-89, 110-110, 137-137
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v at line 31 and similarly at lines 76,
89, 110, and 137, the wrapper functions lack input validation for critical
parameters such as matrix dimensions, leading dimensions, and array lengths. Add
checks at the start of each function to verify that parameters like n, nrhs,
lda, ldb are positive and that the lengths of arrays a, ipiv, and b are
sufficient for the given dimensions. Return an error code or handle invalid
inputs gracefully to prevent undefined behavior or segmentation faults.
| // dpotrf_standardized - Standardized dpotrf wrapper | ||
| @[inline] | ||
| pub fn dpotrf_standardized(uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int) int { | ||
| info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) | ||
| return if info { 0 } else { 1 } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant standardized wrapper for dpotrf.
The dpotrf_standardized function is identical to the existing dpotrf function (lines 110-112), creating unnecessary code duplication.
-// dpotrf_standardized - Standardized dpotrf wrapper
-@[inline]
-pub fn dpotrf_standardized(uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int) int {
- info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda)
- return if info { 0 } else { 1 }
-}Consider using a single implementation or clearly differentiate the purpose of each wrapper.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // dpotrf_standardized - Standardized dpotrf wrapper | |
| @[inline] | |
| pub fn dpotrf_standardized(uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int) int { | |
| info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) | |
| return if info { 0 } else { 1 } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v around lines 145 to 150, the
dpotrf_standardized function duplicates the existing dpotrf function (lines
110-112) without any difference. Remove the dpotrf_standardized wrapper entirely
to eliminate redundant code and rely on the existing dpotrf function instead.
…o use 0-based indexing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v (5)
149-154: Remove redundant dpotrf_standardized function.This function is identical to the existing
dpotrffunction (lines 114-116), creating unnecessary code duplication.-// dpotrf_standardized - Standardized dpotrf wrapper -@[inline] -pub fn dpotrf_standardized(uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int) int { - info := lapack64.dpotrf(uplo, n, mut a, lda) - return if info { 0 } else { 1 } -}
156-163: Consolidate duplicate dsyev implementations.Both
dsyev_standardizedanddsyevhave identical implementations with the same work array management logic. This creates maintenance overhead and potential for inconsistency.Consider implementing one function that calls the other:
pub fn dsyev_standardized(jobz EigenVectorsJob, uplo blas.Uplo, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut w []f64) int { - mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, 3 * n - 1)} - lapack64.dsyev(to_lapack64_eigen_vectors_job(jobz), uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w, mut - work, work.len) - return 0 // lapack64 functions don't return error codes + return dsyev(jobz, uplo, n, mut a, lda, mut w) }Also applies to: 188-196
180-186: Consolidate duplicate dorgqr implementations.Both
dorgqr_standardizedanddorgqrhave identical implementations with the same work array management logic. This creates maintenance overhead and potential for inconsistency.Consider implementing one function that calls the other:
pub fn dorgqr_standardized(m int, n int, k int, mut a []f64, lda int, tau []f64) int { - mut work := []f64{len: math.max(1, n)} - lapack64.dorgqr(m, n, k, mut a, lda, tau, mut work, work.len) - return 0 // lapack64.dorgqr doesn't return error code + return dorgqr(m, n, k, mut a, lda, tau) }Also applies to: 205-212
173-178: Improve placeholder function implementation.The placeholder functions for
dgeqrfreturn-1to indicate "not implemented". Consider using a more robust approach such as using a panic with a descriptive message.-pub fn dgeqrf_standardized(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int { - // Placeholder - not implemented in lapack64 yet - return -1 // Indicate not implemented -} +pub fn dgeqrf_standardized(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int { + errors.vsl_panic('dgeqrf is not yet implemented in lapack64 backend', .efailed) +}-pub fn dgeqrf(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int { - // dgeqrf is not implemented in lapack64 yet - return -1 // Indicate not implemented -} +pub fn dgeqrf(m int, n int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut tau []f64) int { + errors.vsl_panic('dgeqrf is not yet implemented in lapack64 backend', .efailed) +}Also applies to: 198-203
31-33: Add input validation for critical parameters.The wrapper functions lack input validation for critical parameters like matrix dimensions, leading dimensions, and array lengths. This could lead to undefined behavior or segmentation faults.
Consider adding validation for key parameters:
pub fn dgesv(n int, nrhs int, mut a []f64, lda int, mut ipiv []int, mut b []f64, ldb int) int { + if n < 0 || nrhs < 0 || lda < math.max(1, n) || ldb < math.max(1, n) { + errors.vsl_panic('Invalid matrix dimensions in dgesv', .efailed) + } + if a.len < lda * n || b.len < ldb * nrhs || ipiv.len < n { + errors.vsl_panic('Insufficient array lengths in dgesv', .efailed) + } return lapack64.dgesv(n, nrhs, mut a, lda, mut ipiv, mut b, ldb) }Also applies to: 76-83, 94-95, 114-116, 141-144
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
lapack/lapack64/dgetri_test.v (1)
70-72: Consider using existing math library functions.The custom
absfunction is redundant since V'smathmodule already providesmath.abs()function.-fn abs(x f64) f64 { - return if x < 0 { -x } else { x } -} +// Use math.abs() instead of custom abs functionAnd update the usage:
- assert abs(a[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-10, 'identity inverse should be identity' + assert math.abs(a[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-10, 'identity inverse should be identity'lapack/lapack64/dpotrf_test.v (1)
88-90: Consider using existing math library functions.The custom
absfunction is redundant since V'smathmodule already providesmath.abs()function.-fn abs(x f64) f64 { - return if x < 0 { -x } else { x } -} +// Use math.abs() instead of custom abs functionAnd update the usage:
- assert abs(reconstructed[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-8, 'reconstruction error at ${i}: ${diff}' + assert math.abs(reconstructed[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-8, 'reconstruction error at ${i}: ${diff}'- assert abs(a[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-10, 'identity Cholesky should be identity' + assert math.abs(a[i] - expected[i]) < 1e-10, 'identity Cholesky should be identity'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
lapack/lapack64/dgetf2.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetrf_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dgetri_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack64/dpotrf_test.v(1 hunks)lapack/lapack_notd_vsl_lapack_lapacke.v(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- lapack/lapack64/dgetrf.v
- lapack/lapack64/dgetf2.v
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest, --prod)
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: MegaLinter
🔇 Additional comments (7)
lapack/lapack64/dgetri_test.v (2)
3-45: LGTM! Good test structure with comprehensive validation.The test correctly follows the two-step process of LU factorization followed by matrix inversion. The debug output and assertions provide good validation of the results.
47-68: LGTM! Excellent edge case testing with identity matrix.Using the identity matrix as a test case is a smart approach since the inverse of an identity matrix should remain the identity matrix. The numerical tolerance check is appropriate.
lapack/lapack64/dgetrf_test.v (3)
5-44: LGTM! Comprehensive test with good matrix handling.The test correctly converts from 2D array to flat array format and includes proper validation of pivot indices. The debug output helps with troubleshooting.
46-62: LGTM! Excellent singular matrix edge case testing.Testing with a singular matrix (where row 2 is 2x row 1) is crucial for validating error handling. The test correctly expects the function to return false without panicking.
64-88: LGTM! Good additional test case for validation.The test provides another matrix case to ensure the LU factorization works correctly across different inputs. The debug output format is consistent with other tests.
lapack/lapack64/dpotrf_test.v (2)
5-68: LGTM! Excellent test with mathematical verification.The test not only calls the Cholesky factorization but also reconstructs the original matrix by computing U^T * U to verify correctness. The mathematical approach is sound and the numerical tolerance is appropriate.
70-86: LGTM! Good edge case testing with identity matrix.Using the identity matrix as a test case is appropriate since the Cholesky factorization of an identity matrix should remain the identity matrix. The test verifies this correctly.
Summary by CodeRabbit
--use-cblasand--use-lapackeflags where applicable.