Skip to content

Update section 7 draft#6

Merged
blengerich merged 5 commits into
AdaptInfer:mainfrom
hjung-stat:main
May 4, 2026
Merged

Update section 7 draft#6
blengerich merged 5 commits into
AdaptInfer:mainfrom
hjung-stat:main

Conversation

@hjung-stat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@hjung-stat hjung-stat changed the title Add Open Problems and Future Directions section draft Section 7 Update Apr 13, 2026
@hjung-stat hjung-stat changed the title Section 7 Update Update section 7 draft Apr 13, 2026
@tang274
Copy link
Copy Markdown

tang274 commented Apr 21, 2026

Nice job! This section is well structured and clearly tied to the main themes of the paper. One suggestion would be to make each subsection slightly more concrete by including at least one specific biomedical example. For instance, in the “Robustness Under Distribution Shift and System-Level Constraints” subsection, it may be useful to elaborate on a concrete form of distribution shift, such as hospital-to-hospital or scanner-to-scanner variation, perhaps drawing a bit more detail from the cited reference.


Key unresolved questions and research opportunities that will shape the development and deployment of foundation models in biomedicine.
Despite substantial progress in biomedical foundation models, several fundamental challenges remain unresolved. Building on the central themes of this review—namely the tension between domain-specific and general models, the importance of system-level integration, and the need for reliable evaluation—we highlight three core open problems that are likely to shape the future of the field. These challenges are deeply interconnected and reflect limitations not only in model design, but also in data, training objectives, and deployment environments.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The open problems listed here are great.

Under domain specific, is there value in mentioning explicitly the difference between learning ICD codes vs diagnosis.

Another thing is do we want a single multimodal model vs modality specific models that are aggregated by a head model that solves a downstream task. Maybe the multi-model approach is more "intepretable".

Interpretability of models can be absolutely essential in biomedical settings. Should this be added.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the helpful suggestions!

I revised the section by:

  • clarifying the difference between ICD code prediction and clinical diagnosis,
  • adding a brief discussion of unified multimodal models versus modular, modality-specific approaches, and
  • highlighting the role of interpretability in real-world biomedical deployment.

@blengerich blengerich merged commit 9fdf1d6 into AdaptInfer:main May 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants