Skip to content

fix: storage keys cross-version compat#860

Merged
ketkimnaik merged 2 commits into
Azure:ketkinaik/adu-tls-supportfrom
ketkimnaik:fix-int-test-failures
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

fix: storage keys cross-version compat#860
ketkimnaik merged 2 commits into
Azure:ketkinaik/adu-tls-supportfrom
ketkimnaik:fix-int-test-failures

Conversation

@ketkimnaik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with any additional questions or comments.

Thank you for contributing to the IoT extension!

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

Intent for Production

  • It is expected that pull requests made to default or core branches such as dev or main are of production grade. Corollary to this, any merged contributions to these branches may be deployed in a public release at any given time. By checking this box, you agree and commit to the expected production quality of code.

Basic expectations

  • If introducing new functionality or modified behavior, are they backed by unit and/or integration tests?
  • In the same context as above are command names and their parameter definitions accurate? Do help docs have sufficient content?
  • Have all the relevant unit and integration tests pass? i.e. pytest <project root> -vv. Please provide evidence in the form of a screenshot showing a succesful run of tests locally OR a link to a test pipeline that has been run against the change-set.
  • Have linter checks passed using the .pylintrc and .flake8 rules? Look at the CI scripts for example usage.
  • Have extraneous print or debug statements, commented out code-blocks or code-statements (if any) been removed from the surface area of changes?
  • Have you made an entry in HISTORY.rst which concisely explains your user-facing feature or change?

Azure IoT CLI maintainers reserve the right to enforce any of the outlined expectations.

A PR is considered ready for review when all basic expectations have been met (or do not apply).

@ketkimnaik
ketkimnaik requested a review from digimaun as a code owner July 14, 2026 00:13
@ketkimnaik
ketkimnaik requested a review from HangyiWang July 14, 2026 00:13
@cheatsheet1999

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @ketkimnaik, you can pull the latest preview branch to fix the CI Build error. See #853 if needed.

@ketkimnaik
ketkimnaik merged commit 1e5799d into Azure:ketkinaik/adu-tls-support Jul 14, 2026
15 checks passed
ketkimnaik added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2026
* feat: Add adu tls support (#846)

* Add tls support- first draft

* Fix linting error

* chore: Regenerate deviceupdate dataplane SDK for 2026-06-01 API via AutoRest

Use AutoRest 3.9.2 + @autorest/python@5.19.0 against:
specification/deviceupdate/data-plane/Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/stable/2026-06-01/deviceupdate.json

Key changes from 2022-10-01:
- api_version updated to 2026-06-01 throughout all operations
- Added DownloadSecurity enum (https/http)
- Added download_security field to Deployment model

* feat: Add --download-security parameter to adu device deployment create

* fix: patch IO isinstance check

* fix: patch autorest generator bugs

* Updated the help text to be more precise.

* Fix mismatched format

* fix: E501 line too long in params help text

---------

Co-authored-by: Ketki <ketkinaik@microsoft.com>

* fix: storage keys cross-version compat (#860)

* fix: storage keys cross-version compat

* fix: bump wheel to 0.45.1 for CI linter

---------

Co-authored-by: Ketki <ketkinaik@microsoft.com>

* fix: storage keys SDK compat (#861)

Co-authored-by: Ketki <ketkinaik@microsoft.com>

* fix: storage keys SDK compat (#862)

Co-authored-by: Ketki <ketkinaik@microsoft.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Ketki <ketkinaik@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants