{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1 #1322

PetrKralCZ · 2025-11-26T11:46:46Z

2 out of 108 required modules missing:

* ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a (ITK-5.3.0-foss-2023a.eb)
* SimpleITK/2.3.1-foss-2023a (SimpleITK-2.3.1-foss-2023a.eb)

boegel · 2025-11-26T12:14:56Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-11-26T12:15:04Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.11/pr_1322/108014

date	job status	comment
Nov 26 12:15:02 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `108014` awaits release by job manager
Nov 26 12:15:12 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Nov 26 12:20:24 UTC 2025	running	job `108014` is running
Nov 26 14:14:07 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-108014.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17641661960.tar.zst` size: 133 MiB (139476459 bytes) entries: 8175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all `ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software `ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Nov 26 14:14:07 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 447.757 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 447.908 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 2.84 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 2.55 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 6.06 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 5.93 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.75 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6372.68 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6390.5 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-108014.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-11-26T12:15:07Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.11/pr_1322/704565

date	job status	comment
Nov 26 12:15:05 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `704565` awaits release by job manager
Nov 26 12:15:57 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Nov 26 12:17:00 UTC 2025	running	job `704565` is running
Nov 26 16:28:31 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-704565.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17641740930.tar.zst` size: 126 MiB (132574061 bytes) entries: 8175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Nov 26 16:28:31 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.65 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8209.28 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8311.43 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 33.773 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 580.161 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-704565.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

hvelab · 2025-11-27T14:00:13Z

Just FYI, looking at this, seems some error in the configure step for SimpleITK...

hvelab · 2025-12-01T13:18:27Z

CMake Error at Code/BasicFilters/src/CMakeLists.txt:171 (target_link_libraries):
  Cannot specify link libraries for target "SimpleITK_ITKImageIntensity"
  which is not built by this project.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
``

hvelab · 2025-12-01T15:29:51Z

I think I found it, was picking Lua from compatibilty layer instead of the proper binary so the configuration was all messed up.... double checking

hvelab · 2025-12-01T16:08:11Z

bingo :) (building on top of EESSI)

== Build succeeded for 1 out of 1
== Summary:
   * [SUCCESS] SimpleITK/2.3.1-foss-2023a
== Temporary log file(s) /tmp/eb-rbh__9ck/easybuild-5c9kizip.log* have been removed.
== Temporary directory /tmp/eb-rbh__9ck has been removed.

I'll ask tomorrow in the support meeting the best way to fix this, but I assume a hook

boegel · 2025-12-03T12:20:49Z

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

hvelab · 2025-12-03T12:31:57Z

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

Adding the CMake option:
-DSimpleITK_LUA_EXECUTABLE=$EBROOTLUA/bin/lua

boegel · 2025-12-09T12:32:16Z

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

Adding the CMake option: -DSimpleITK_LUA_EXECUTABLE=$EBROOTLUA/bin/lua

@PetrKralCZ Can you look into making this change in configopts for all recent SimpleITK easyconfigs in EasyBuild?

PetrKralCZ · 2025-12-17T11:13:14Z

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

Adding the CMake option: -DSimpleITK_LUA_EXECUTABLE=$EBROOTLUA/bin/lua

@PetrKralCZ Can you look into making this change in configopts for all recent SimpleITK easyconfigs in EasyBuild?

@boegel

Make SimpleITK pick the right Lua binary easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#24908

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1

5df4801

boegel added the 2023.06-software.eessi.io 2023.06 version of software.eessi.io label Nov 26, 2025

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2025

{tools}[foss/2025a] SimpleITK v2.5.3, ITK v5.4.5, CastXML v0.6.13 easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#24886

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1 #1322

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1 #1322

Uh oh!

PetrKralCZ commented Nov 26, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 26, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Nov 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Nov 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Nov 27, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 9, 2025

Uh oh!

PetrKralCZ commented Dec 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1 #1322

Are you sure you want to change the base?

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1 #1322

Uh oh!

Conversation

PetrKralCZ commented Nov 26, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 26, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Nov 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Nov 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Nov 27, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

hvelab commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 9, 2025

Uh oh!

PetrKralCZ commented Dec 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Nov 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Nov 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

hvelab commented Dec 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading