Fix order of available projects in test_recipe

[valeriupredoi]

Description

Order got mangled for some reason - you know why @bouweandela ?

---

Before you get started

• ☝ Create an issue to discuss what you are going to do

Checklist

It is the responsibility of the author to make sure the pull request is ready to review. The icons indicate whether the item will be subject to the 🛠 Technical or 🧪 Scientific review.

• 🧪 The new functionality is relevant and scientifically sound
• 🛠 This pull request has a descriptive title and labels
• 🛠 All checks below this pull request were successful

---

To help with the number pull requests:

• 🙏 We kindly ask you to review two other open pull requests in this repository

[bouweandela]

Based on which tests are failing here: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ESMValGroup/ESMValCore?branch=main, it looks like something changed in a dependency. That test is a pain anyway, I've had to update it several times already. Maybe you could change it so it doesn't depend on the order of the projects and doesn't fail again when we add a another project?

[valeriupredoi]

Based on which tests are failing here: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/ESMValGroup/ESMValCore?branch=main, it looks like something changed in a dependency. That test is a pain anyway, I've had to update it several times already. Maybe you could change it so it doesn't depend on the order of the projects and doesn't fail again when we add a another project?

ah! Good call - I was suspecting it's a dependency, since we've not changed anything since yesterday 😁 Yes, let me have a closer look at it then

[valeriupredoi]

@bouweandela ut's blithering Dask!

  - dask         2026.3.0  pyhc364b38_0  conda-forge     Cached
  + dask         2026.1.2  pyhcf101f3_1  conda-forge     Cached
  - dask-core    2026.3.0  pyhc364b38_0  conda-forge     Cached
  + dask-core    2026.1.2  pyhcf101f3_0  conda-forge     Cached
  - distributed  2026.3.0  pyhc364b38_0  conda-forge     Cached
  + distributed  2026.1.2  pyhcf101f3_1  conda-forge     Cached

aghh!

[valeriupredoi]

OK @bouweandela the test is now dask-agnostic 🍺

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.70%. Comparing base (69f2019) to head (5376610).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3023   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.70%   95.70%           
=======================================
  Files         267      267           
  Lines       15768    15768           
=======================================
  Hits        15090    15090           
  Misses        678      678           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[bouweandela]

Thanks V! Some suggestions to make this more future-proof

[bouweandela]

It would be really nice to make this independent of which projects have been configured exactly, because now this test needs to be updated every time you add support for a new project. How about something like?

Suggested change

	"The following tables are available: CMIP3, CMIP5, CMIP6, CMIP7, "
	"CORDEX, obs4MIPs, ana4MIPs, OBS, OBS6, native6, ACCESS, CESM, EMAC, "
	'ICON, IPSLCM."'
	"The following tables are available: .*."'

followed by

assert re.match(msg, exc.value.failed_tasks[0].message)

and as an additional sanity check, test that one or two expected projects are in the message:

assert "CMIP7" in exc.value.failed_tasks[0].message

[valeriupredoi]

that's a different test approach, bud - my idea was this test to be restrictive ie when a project is no longer supported, or another becomes supported, it should fail and one of us should edit that list. What you are proposing is to make the test rather loose - if you think that's better then I'll pop in the suggestions, but I like it restrictive TBF