-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Handle LCOX errors correctly #1129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
alexdewar
wants to merge
8
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
handle-lcox-errors
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+163
−89
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8a04b1a
Drop `demand` field from `AppraisalOutput`
alexdewar a44c3e7
Make `ObjectiveCoefficients` `Rc` to remove need for deep copy
alexdewar 299568a
appraise_investment: Return `None` for zero-capacity results, rather …
alexdewar 1c912e7
Log when skipping zero-capacity investment option
alexdewar ebb5569
Skip investments with zero activity for LCOX
alexdewar cfee637
Mention LCOX bugfix in release notes
alexdewar d376075
Add some missing details to release notes
alexdewar 2a2a587
Add test for `AppraisalOutput::new()`
alexdewar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new test case’s inline explanation is mathematically incorrect: the fixed-cost term is still
annual_fixed_cost * capacity(e.g.100*50), so the numerator is not zero even though total activity is. Please update the comment to reflect the actual expression being avoided (division by zero leading to an invalid/infinite result).