Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade ubuntu from 22.04 to kinetic#76

Open
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-a81f1d60911a6535a00e5510ee02c55f
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade ubuntu from 22.04 to kinetic#76
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-a81f1d60911a6535a00e5510ee02c55f

Conversation

@snyk-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • API_Spec/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to ubuntu:kinetic, as this image has only 7 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
low severity 150 Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-UBUNTU2204-NCURSES-2801048
No Known Exploit
low severity 221 Improper Certificate Validation
SNYK-UBUNTU2204-OPENSSL-5296052
No Known Exploit
low severity 221 Improper Certificate Validation
SNYK-UBUNTU2204-OPENSSL-5296082
No Known Exploit
low severity 221 CVE-2023-29383
SNYK-UBUNTU2204-SHADOW-5425688
No Known Exploit
low severity 221 CVE-2023-29383
SNYK-UBUNTU2204-SHADOW-5425688
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
⚠️ ACTION actionlint 3 1 0.1s
⚠️ BASH bash-exec 2 2 0.01s
⚠️ BASH shellcheck 2 8 0.02s
✅ BASH shfmt 2 0 0 0.03s
⚠️ C cpplint 1 7 0.11s
⚠️ COPYPASTE jscpd yes 12 1.47s
⚠️ CSS stylelint 1 0 1 1.27s
⚠️ DOCKERFILE hadolint 2 1 0.19s
⚠️ HTML djlint 4 46 0.55s
⚠️ HTML htmlhint 4 49 0.24s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 2 0 0 0.96s
✅ JSON jsonlint 2 0 0.15s
✅ JSON prettier 2 0 0 0.41s
✅ JSON v8r 2 0 2.43s
⚠️ MAKEFILE checkmake 1 1 0.01s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 1 0 0 0.33s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-link-check 1 0 0.51s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 1 0 0 0.29s
⚠️ PYTHON bandit 21 90 3.14s
✅ PYTHON black 21 0 0 1.17s
⚠️ PYTHON flake8 21 19 0.51s
✅ PYTHON isort 21 0 0 0.43s
⚠️ PYTHON mypy 21 1 0.27s
⚠️ PYTHON pylint 21 38 3.61s
⚠️ PYTHON pyright 21 45 7.26s
⚠️ PYTHON ruff 21 0 20 0.08s
⚠️ REPOSITORY checkov yes 7 10.98s
⚠️ REPOSITORY devskim yes 7 1.27s
✅ REPOSITORY dustilock yes no 1.07s
⚠️ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes 2 2.34s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.02s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no 0.94s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no 0.29s
⚠️ REPOSITORY trivy yes 1 5.72s
⚠️ SPELL cspell 49 282 21.75s
✅ SPELL misspell 48 0 0 0.06s
✅ SQL sql-lint 2 0 0.58s
⚠️ SQL tsqllint 2 1 0.47s
✅ YAML prettier 7 0 0 0.74s
✅ YAML v8r 7 0 6.81s
✅ YAML yamllint 7 0 0.25s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

You could have same capabilities but better runtime performances if you request a new MegaLinter flavor.

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant