Skip to content

WIP: Experimental Python package builds against ITK 6.0 Beta 2#381

Draft
thewtex wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test-itk-6.0b2
Draft

WIP: Experimental Python package builds against ITK 6.0 Beta 2#381
thewtex wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test-itk-6.0b2

Conversation

@thewtex
Copy link
Member

@thewtex thewtex commented Mar 24, 2026

No description provided.

@thewtex
Copy link
Member Author

thewtex commented Mar 24, 2026

@thewtex
Copy link
Member Author

thewtex commented Mar 24, 2026

xref #307

@thewtex
Copy link
Member Author

thewtex commented Mar 24, 2026

Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:71 (FetchContent_Populate)
This warning is for project developers.  Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.

CMake Warning (dev) at /home/runner/work/ITKElastix/ITK/CMake/UseITK.cmake:28 (message):
  CMake/UseITK.cmake is deprecated.

  Please update CMakeLists.txt to use `find_package(ITK)` and link to
  "${ITK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES}".

Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /home/runner/work/ITKElastix/build/_deps/elx-src/CMakeLists.txt:89 (include)

@N-Dekker is there a version of elastix that has been updated for ITK 6 CMake module targets?

@N-Dekker
Copy link
Collaborator

is there a version of elastix that has been updated for ITK 6 CMake module targets?

@thewtex I don't think so, sorry! The last time I tried an ITK 6 with elastix, it was still without "CMake module targets", if I understand correctly. It was using the old ITK v6.0b02 tagged by Hans: https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/tree/Use-ITK-v6.0b02

Do you think support for ITK 6 CMake module targets could be added without dropping ITK5, for elastix? You know, I would like the main branch of elastix to support using an official release of ITK, not just a beta. So then elastix should at least support the last non-beta of ITK, which is now ITK 5.4.5. 🤷

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants