Skip to content

Conversation

@fantazio
Copy link
Collaborator

@fantazio fantazio commented Feb 2, 2026

When designing a lib, one may want to explictly expose some submodules as part of its API. While doing so, some parts of these submodules may remain hidden from the API but exposed by the submodules for internal use.
Reporting on values in a library API and submodules must remain actionable. Therefore, the semantic is:

  • For a value defined in the submodule, account for all the uses internal to the library but the ones in the submodule itself (unless there is no interface or the --internal option is used, as usual). Among those uses, re-expositions count. I.e. if the value is exposed by the API, then this counts as a use because it is required.
  • For a submodule's value exposed in the API, account for all the uses external to the library.

Uses of an API value may be propagated to the submodule's value. This is currently the case e.g. in the threshold-3-0.5 test scenario which expects ./examples/using_dune/reduced_lib/values.mli:1: used in the exported values used 3 times. It is used inside Value, by requirement for Reduced_lib.Values API and outside the library transitively by the use of Reduced_lib.Values.used in
examples/using_dune/reduced_lib/values.ml.

Hence, a submodule's value explicitly exposed in the API cannot be reported as unused while the API's value may be.

This is coherent with the general value reporting semantic.

When designing a lib, one may want to explictly expose some submodules
as part of its API. While doing so, some parts of these submodules may
remain hidden from the API but exposed by the submodules for internal
use.
Reporting on values in a library API and submodules must remain
actionable. Therefore, the semantic is:
- For a value defined in the submodule, account for all the uses
internal to the library but the ones in the submodule itself (unless
there is no interface or the `--internal` option is used, as usual).
Among those uses, re-expositions count. I.e. if the value is exposed by
the API, then this counts as a use because it is required.
- For a submodule's value exposed in the API, account for all the uses
external to the library.

Uses of an API value may be propagated to the submodule's value. This is
currently the case e.g. in the threshold-3-0.5 test scenario which
expects `./examples/using_dune/reduced_lib/values.mli:1: used` in the
exported values used 3 times. It is used inside `Value`, by requirement
for `Reduced_lib.Values` API and outside the library transitively by the
use of `Reduced_lib.Values.used` in
`examples/using_dune/reduced_lib/values.ml`.

Hence, a submodule's value explicitly exposed in the API cannot be
reported as unused while the API's value may be.

This is coherent with the general value reporting semantic.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant