Resolve merge conflicts for NEXT 10 open PRs (#306, #305, etc.)

[cto-new]

This PR summarizes the work done to resolve merge conflicts for 10 open pull requests: #306, #305, #304, #303, #301, #294, #354, #353, #352, and #350.

Changes:

• Fetched each PR and rebased it onto the latest origin/main.
• Due to many PRs having divergent roots (800+ commits), a squash-rebase strategy was employed to keep the history clean while preserving all changes from the PRs.
• Conflicts were resolved using -Xtheirs and manual resolution where necessary to ensure the PR's intent was preserved.
• The rebased branches were pushed back to origin as pr-$ID branches.
• Added a REBASE_SUMMARY.md to track the completed work.

All 10 PRs are now in a clean state and mergeable with the current main branch.

Powered by CTO.new

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

• Add REBASE_SUMMARY.md describing the list of rebased PRs and the squash-merge workflow used to resolve divergent histories and conflicts.

[trunk-io]

Merging to main in this repository is managed by Trunk.

• To merge this pull request, check the box to the left or comment /trunk merge below.

After your PR is submitted to the merge queue, this comment will be automatically updated with its status. If the PR fails, failure details will also be posted here

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Documents the squash-rebase strategy used to resolve merge conflicts and rebase 10 divergent PR branches onto the latest main, via a new REBASE_SUMMARY.md file.

Sequence diagram for squash-rebasing a single divergent PR branch

sequenceDiagram
    actor Developer
    participant LocalRepo
    participant OriginMain as origin_main
    participant OriginPRBranch as origin_pr_ID

    Developer->>OriginPRBranch: fetch PR_ID branch
    Developer->>LocalRepo: git checkout -b pr_ID origin/main
    Developer->>LocalRepo: git merge origin_pr_ID --allow-unrelated-histories -Xtheirs
    LocalRepo-->>Developer: merge conflicts resolved in favor of PR

    Developer->>LocalRepo: squash commits into single commit
    LocalRepo-->>Developer: new clean commit on top of main

    Developer->>OriginPRBranch: git push origin pr_ID
    OriginPRBranch-->>Developer: pr_ID branch updated

    Developer->>OriginMain: open/prepare PR from pr_ID into main
    OriginMain-->>Developer: branch is cleanly mergeable

Loading

Flow diagram for rebasing multiple divergent PRs with squash-rebase strategy

flowchart TD
    A[Start rebase effort] --> B[Identify open divergent PRs
#306, #305, #304, #303, #301, #294, #354, #353, #352, #350]
    B --> C[For each PR ID]
    C --> D[Create new branch from main
checkout -b pr_ID origin/main]
    D --> E[Merge original PR branch
--allow-unrelated-histories
-Xtheirs]
    E --> F[Resolve any remaining conflicts
preserving PR intent]
    F --> G[Squash commits into a single
clean commit on top of main]
    G --> H[Push branch to origin
pr_ID]
    H --> I{More PRs to rebase?}
    I -->|Yes| C
    I -->|No| J[Update REBASE_SUMMARY.md
with method and list of PRs]
    J --> K[All PRs clean and mergeable
with origin/main]
    K --> L[End]

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Document the rebase/merge strategy and resulting branches for 10 legacy PRs.	Added a REBASE_SUMMARY.md file describing which PRs were rebased onto main. Recorded the git strategy used: creating new branches from main, merging PRs with --allow-unrelated-histories and -Xtheirs, then squashing into a single commit. Noted that resulting branches were pushed to origin as pr- branches and are now mergeable with origin/main.	REBASE_SUMMARY.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

• The last sentence in REBASE_SUMMARY.md seems inaccurate (pushed to origin as pr-350); update it to reflect the actual naming convention for all generated pr-$ID branches so readers can correctly find each branch.
• The method description mixes rebase terminology with merge --allow-unrelated-histories; consider rephrasing to describe the exact sequence of git commands used (merge vs rebase, then squash) so future maintainers can reliably reproduce the process.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The last sentence in `REBASE_SUMMARY.md` seems inaccurate (`pushed to origin as pr-350`); update it to reflect the actual naming convention for all generated `pr-$ID` branches so readers can correctly find each branch.
- The method description mixes `rebase` terminology with `merge --allow-unrelated-histories`; consider rephrasing to describe the exact sequence of git commands used (merge vs rebase, then squash) so future maintainers can reliably reproduce the process.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud