refactor(pathfinder): author candidates in search order - #2708
Draft
rwgk wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Contributor
|
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
Contributor
Author
|
/ok to test e7705a7 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Follow-up to #2689 and the ordering discussion in
#2689 (comment).
Pathfinder historically authored dynamic-library filenames in ascending order,
then reversed them at each runtime lookup site. That distinction no longer
serves the descriptor catalog and makes preference mistakes easier.
This PR:
order, most preferred first;
search consume the descriptor tuples as-is;
SUPPORTED_*projections at their compatibility boundary; and
utilities, static libraries, and bitcode libraries are consumed first to
last.
The tuple rewrite is mechanically behavior-neutral: every multi-name dynamic
library tuple is the exact reverse of its previous catalog representation, and
the corresponding runtime reversal is removed.
Validation
cuda-pathfindersuite: 1,608 passed, 5 skipped on CUDA 13.3.checker).