docs: add SARIF normalization and exit code handling to Section 2-3-5 (Security Gates) - #107
Open
moghit-eou wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
docs: add SARIF normalization and exit code handling to Section 2-3-5 (Security Gates)#107moghit-eou wants to merge 2 commits into
moghit-eou wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Hello @Ali-Yazdani , As @moghit-eou mentioned this is a proposed upstream contribution as part of the following GSoC project https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2026/projects/m6uAnHtG . Happy to receive feedback :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, Section 2-3-5 discusses security gates but lacks concrete implementation details for handling the realities of multi-scanner DevSecOps pipelines. When running multiple SCA tools (e.g., OSV-Scanner for dependencies, Trivy for containers), teams often face fragmented pass/fail signals and inconsistent exit code semantics, leading to silent false negatives or blocked pipelines due to misconfigured tool crashes.
Proposed Changes
security-severityscore across all scanners.ERROR) from a vulnerability threshold breach (FAILED).1meaning "vulnerabilities found" is not misinterpreted as "scanner failed."sys.exit(1)and standard error outputs (stderr) based on the normalized decision.This PR is part of a GSoC project (cc @jdaln for context). The wider project follows the OWASP DevSecOps Guidelines as its foundation.