Skip to content

Conversation

@abdulraqeeb33
Copy link
Contributor

@abdulraqeeb33 abdulraqeeb33 commented Nov 12, 2025

Description

One Line Summary

Handling race condition during initWithContext

Details

Motivation

#2192 (comment)
To address this issue

Scope

Internal racecondition handling.

Testing

Unit testing

NA

Manual testing

Smoke tested the app

Affected code checklist

  • Notifications
    • Display
    • Open
    • Push Processing
    • Confirm Deliveries
  • Outcomes
  • Sessions
  • In-App Messaging
  • REST API requests
  • Public API changes

Checklist

Overview

  • I have filled out all REQUIRED sections above
  • PR does one thing
    • If it is hard to explain how any codes changes are related to each other then it most likely needs to be more than one PR
  • Any Public API changes are explained in the PR details and conform to existing APIs

Testing

  • I have included test coverage for these changes, or explained why they are not needed
  • All automated tests pass, or I explained why that is not possible
  • I have personally tested this on my device, or explained why that is not possible

Final pass

  • Code is as readable as possible.
    • Simplify with less code, followed by splitting up code into well named functions and variables, followed by adding comments to the code.
  • I have reviewed this PR myself, ensuring it meets each checklist item
    • WIP (Work In Progress) is ok, but explain what is still in progress and what you would like feedback on. Start the PR title with "WIP" to indicate this.

This change is Reviewable

Comment on lines +332 to +342
// Check state and provide appropriate error messages
when (initState) {
InitState.FAILED -> {
throw IllegalStateException("Initialization failed. Cannot proceed.")
}
InitState.NOT_STARTED -> {
throw IllegalStateException("Must call 'initWithContext' before 'logout'")
}
InitState.IN_PROGRESS, InitState.SUCCESS -> {
// Continue - these states allow proceeding (will wait if needed)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate code, can we make a function for this?


if (!initState.isSDKAccessible()) {
throw IllegalStateException("Must call 'initWithContext' before 'login'")
// Check state and provide appropriate error messages
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can isSDKAccessible() be changed to something like checkSDKAccessible() so that it throws proper error messages based on initState, and do nothing if allow proceeding?

}
}

waitForInit()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are essentially checking init state before and after waitForInit(). Should we let waitForInit() handle the throwing/proceeding based on the initState so we don't need to check for the state again in the usage?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants