Skip to content

Fix the definition of the Vietoris-Rips Complex - #39

Open
haiderriazkhan wants to merge 1 commit into
PAIR-code:masterfrom
haiderriazkhan:patch-1
Open

Fix the definition of the Vietoris-Rips Complex#39
haiderriazkhan wants to merge 1 commit into
PAIR-code:masterfrom
haiderriazkhan:patch-1

Conversation

@haiderriazkhan

@haiderriazkhan haiderriazkhan commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The previous wording incorrectly suggested that the 0- and 1-simplices themselves constitute a Vietoris–Rips Complex. A Vietoris–Rips Complex can contain higher-dimensional simplices, but it is completely determined by its 1-skeleton: whenever a set of vertices is pairwise connected, the corresponding higher dimensional simplex is included.

This change also clarifies the preceding Čech construction by describing simplices as arising from sets of points whose neighborhoods have a non-empty common intersection.

For reference, see:
[1]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn123oUaiDk&t=282s
[2]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.04019

The previous wording incorrectly suggested that the 0- and 1-simplices themselves constitute a Vietoris–Rips complex. A Vietoris–Rips complex can contain higher-dimensional simplices, but it is completely determined by its 1-skeleton: whenever a set of vertices is pairwise connected, the corresponding higher-dimensional simplex is included.

This change also clarifies the preceding Čech construction by describing simplices as arising from sets of points whose neighborhoods have a non-empty common intersection, not "points that overlap."

For reference, see:
[1]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn123oUaiDk&t=282s
[2]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.04019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant