Skip to content

feat(internal/ethapi): add eth_getStorageValues method #32591#2116

Open
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:eth_getStorageValues
Open

feat(internal/ethapi): add eth_getStorageValues method #32591#2116
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:eth_getStorageValues

Conversation

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Ref: ethereum#32591

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 26, 2026 05:56
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new eth_getStorageValues RPC method that allows batch retrieval of storage slot values from multiple addresses at a specified block, improving efficiency over making multiple individual eth_getStorageAt calls.

Changes:

  • Added GetStorageValues API method with a 1024-slot limit to prevent abuse
  • Implemented comprehensive test coverage including happy path, edge cases, and error conditions
  • Registered the method in web3 extension for JavaScript client access

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
internal/ethapi/api.go Implements GetStorageValues method with slot limit validation and batch state retrieval
internal/ethapi/api_test.go Adds comprehensive test coverage including mock backend and multiple test scenarios
internal/web3ext/web3ext.go Registers the new eth_getStorageValues method in web3 JavaScript extension

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +552 to +556
if err := state.Error(); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
result[addr] = vals
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The state.Error() check is inside the outer loop, which causes it to be called once per address. This is inefficient and inconsistent with similar methods like GetStorageAt which call state.Error() only once after all state accesses are complete. Consider moving this check outside the loop to check only once after all values have been retrieved.

Suggested change
if err := state.Error(); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
result[addr] = vals
}
result[addr] = vals
}
if err := state.Error(); err != nil {
return nil, err
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants