fix(coordinator): tolerate unsupported Windows directory sync - #4459
fix(coordinator): tolerate unsupported Windows directory sync#4459Yeachan-Heo wants to merge 37 commits into
Conversation
|
Signed evidence (GJC): #4457 is fixed by commit a50538f. Coordinator durable state now uses one atomic file-sync → rename → directory-barrier contract; Windows suppresses only directory-handle Verification: 133 focused coordinator tests passed; package TypeScript check passed; package check passed with existing warnings. Fresh independent architecture review: CLEAR. Root |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a50538f99e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** Atomically publish a synced coordinator state file, then barrier its parent. */ | ||
| export async function writeCoordinatorAtomic( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This changes the shipped coding-agent coordinator persistence behavior, but the commit leaves packages/coding-agent/CHANGELOG.md unchanged and has no Unreleased entry for #4457. Add a concise entry under ## [Unreleased] describing the Windows directory-sync compatibility fix.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L188-L188
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
8515a3c to
7c8e177
Compare
|
Signed replacement-head evidence (GJC) Head |
|
@codex review Please review only replacement head Footer: GJC #4457 | exact head fd07dc4 | original PR base 6080b98 |
|
Signed latest-head evidence (GJC) Latest PR head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7c8e177f54
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| if (platform !== "win32") return false; | ||
| const code = (error as NodeJS.ErrnoException | undefined)?.code; | ||
| // Bun reports EPERM when fsync is applied to a Windows directory handle. | ||
| return code === "EPERM" || code === "ENOTSUP" || code === "EOPNOTSUPP" || code === "EINVAL"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When Windows reports EACCES while opening or syncing the parent directory, this classifier rethrows after the coordinator file has already been fsynced and appended or renamed, so mutations return an error despite having changed durable state and retries can observe an uncertain result. The repository's established Windows directory-barrier implementations explicitly accept EACCES at both stages (packages/coding-agent/src/sdk/broker/session-index.ts:626-641 and packages/coding-agent/src/sdk/broker/discovery.ts:144-159); include it here while retaining strict handling for file fsync failures and all POSIX errors.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
REQUEST_CHANGES — independent latest-head rereview Reviewed exact head Durability review is clean: the shared helper suppresses only Windows directory open/sync Blocker: exact-head CI run Local exact-head evidence: Footer: GJC independent rereview | PR #4459 | exact head 7c8e177 | base 6080b98 | current dev 0cecbaf | REQUEST_CHANGES |
|
Signed CI evidence (GJC) Exact-head Dev CI Footer: GJC #4457 | head 7c8e177 | base 6080b98 | CI 31694707091 |
|
Signed dependency evidence (GJC) Exact run Footer: GJC #4457 | PR #4459 | head 7c8e177 | base 6080b98 | CI 31694707091 | shard 94435666667 |
7c8e177 to
f7fc033
Compare
|
Signed rebased-head evidence (GJC) #4436 repair merged as dev |
|
Signed final review-blocker repair (GJC) Exact replacement head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a1b8613995
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| await fs.link(temp, file); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| await fs.unlink(temp).catch(() => {}); | ||
| await fs.unlink(temp); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When fs.link() reports EEXIST because another process won the bind, a transient failure removing this process's temporary file (for example, a Windows sharing violation) now escapes before the EEXIST branch can load the valid concurrent handoff. The previous best-effort cleanup preserved the link error; keep cleanup best-effort here so an unlink failure does not turn a successful concurrent registration into a request failure.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
a1b8613 to
9815acb
Compare
|
Signed current-dev rejoin (GJC) Stale CI/review was stopped after dev advanced through #4467. PR-owned commits were rebased without unrelated edits onto exact dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9815acb88d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| } finally { | ||
| await handle.close(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When Bun's concurrent child-pipe teardown has already closed a fully written and fsynced append descriptor, handle.close() rejects with EBADF here and turns successful journal publication into a reported failure. Coordinator callers such as appendCoordinatorEvent may then retry despite the record already being durable, creating an uncertain or duplicate event outcome; preserve write/sync failures, but tolerate EBADF from close only after those stages succeeded, as the established handling in packages/coding-agent/src/sdk/broker/session-index.ts:618-621 does.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
9815acb to
1859d7f
Compare
|
Signed reviewer-blocker repair (GJC) Exact replacement head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1859d7ff9e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| }; | ||
| await ensureDir(eventsDir(namespaceDir)); | ||
| await fs.appendFile(eventJournalFile(namespaceDir), `${JSON.stringify(event)}\n`); | ||
| await appendCoordinatorFile(eventJournalFile(namespaceDir), `${JSON.stringify(event)}\n`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the journal write and file fsync succeed but the newly added close or parent-directory barrier rejects, this call returns before latest-seq.json is advanced even though the event is already present. The next append trusts the still-valid stale sequence file in readLatestEventSeq() instead of inspecting the journal, so it reuses the same sequence number and event ID, leaving duplicate IDs in the journal. Preserve failure propagation, but make subsequent sequence allocation reconcile the cached sequence with the journal after this uncertain append outcome.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1859d7f to
ba4f40d
Compare
|
Signed current-dev rejoin (GJC) All prior evidence is stale after #4468. The six PR-owned coordinator durability commits were replayed without unrelated edits onto exact dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ba4f40db9d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| await appendCodexWakeDiagnostic(namespaceDir, event, error); | ||
| return null; | ||
| }); | ||
| throw error; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a session has a Codex handoff and a wake-eligible event is emitted, any recordCodexWakeEvent() failure now escapes here after the caller's state mutation, event-journal append, and sequence update have already succeeded. For tool mutations, withToolIdempotency() converts that exception into an error response and seals it as completed, so every same-key retry permanently replays a failure even though the requested mutation occurred. Preserve the previous isolation of wake recording, or represent this post-publication failure as a nonterminal/uncertain outcome that can be reconciled rather than sealing it.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
ba4f40d to
26ae017
Compare
|
Signed exact-head evidence (GJC) Exact replacement head Footer: GJC #4457 | PR #4459 | head 26ae017 | base d659a0a | external #4474 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 26ae01730f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| } catch (error) { | ||
| await appendCodexWakeDiagnostic(namespaceDir, diagnosticEvent, error); | ||
| return { auto_bound: false }; | ||
| throw error; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an explicit Codex handoff exists but bindDelegateCodexHandoff() fails—for example because its durable file write fails—this rethrow occurs after controlSession() accepted the prompt and recordAcceptedPrompt() recorded the running turn. withToolIdempotency() then seals the resulting unavailable response as completed, so same-key retries permanently report failure even though the delegation is already running; preserve the previous { auto_bound: false } isolation or represent this post-delivery outcome as nonterminal.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| process.stderr.write("codex-wake-diagnostic-unwritable\n"); | ||
| } catch {} | ||
| } | ||
| await appendCoordinatorFile( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the diagnostic log cannot be appended or synced, this helper now rejects instead of swallowing the secondary failure. Background error handlers such as the wake queue catch at line 1560 and detached startup drain at line 2361 await this helper without another guard, so the very error path intended to isolate a wake failure can produce an unhandled rejection and potentially terminate the coordinator; retain durable writes where possible, but make diagnostic persistence best-effort as before.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
26ae017 to
daf61d9
Compare
|
Signed current-dev rejoin (GJC) Dev advanced through #4470 while prior Footer: GJC #4457 | PR #4459 | head daf61d9 | base 0a736b1 | external #4474 |
Coordinator wake persistence must not downgrade state or cleanup failures into ordinary transport outcomes. Fence no-replace publication before cleanup and preserve atomic cleanup, binding, update, and diagnostic failures. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-state Constraint: durability failures remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator MCP, handoff, sidecar, and durability suites
A file sync failure must prevent directory durability work. Assert the file and directory failure paths independently. Lore-id: issue-4457-file-sync-order Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator durability, handoff, and MCP server suites
First durable coordinator writes must preserve their newly-created directory entries. Barrier each created parent, durable removals, and no-replace handoff publication while tolerating only Windows directory support limits. Lore-id: issue-4457-directory-ancestry Constraint: directory and cleanup errors remain fail-closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator durability, handoff, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Canonical state directories and projection cleanup are part of the coordinator durability boundary. Barrier newly-created state ancestry, durable WAL/projection removals, and fail closed on unreadable projections while skipping recognized lock quarantine artifacts. Lore-id: issue-4457-canonical-state Constraint: only proven absence may read as empty Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator MCP server, durability, and sidecar suites
Coordinator journals are durable authority and cannot silently skip malformed records. Reject malformed outbox and event entries before emitting or exposing partial state. Lore-id: issue-4457-journal-corruption Constraint: malformed durable state fails closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator MCP server, durability, and sidecar suites
Parseable but forged journal entries can suppress canonical events or reuse event sequence numbers. Validate outbox and event schemas before treating durable journal records as authoritative. Lore-id: issue-4457-journal-schema Constraint: parseable corruption fails closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator MCP server, durability, and sidecar suites
Terminal runtime state access errors must not be mislabeled as invalid JSON. Keep only absence and syntax parsing distinct; propagate other durable storage failures. Lore-id: issue-4457-terminal-marker-read Constraint: durable read failures remain fail-closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: session-state-sidecar suite
A durable wake failure and forged outbox collision cannot be silently retried or treated as emitted. Retain rejected wake tails and require exact persisted outbox records before suppressing canonical events. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-outbox-integrity Constraint: durable wake and outbox failures remain fail-closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator MCP server, durability, and sidecar suites
Retained rejected wake tails must not create an unhandled rejection. Observe rejection for cleanup while retaining it for subsequent fail-closed publishers. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-tail-observation Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator MCP server and durability suites
Startup wake replay remains observable by readiness callers while avoiding an unhandled rejection before the first coordinator operation. Lore-id: issue-4457-startup-wake-observer Constraint: startup durability failures remain fail-closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator MCP server and durability suites
Corrupt optional Codex handoffs must be diagnosed without losing terminal coordinator events. Restore bounded diagnostic-and-continue behavior after durable event publication. Lore-id: issue-4457-optional-wake-recovery Constraint: optional handoff corruption cannot erase coordinator events Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator Codex bridge, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Corrupt optional handoffs should not discard terminal coordinator events, while wake-record durability failures remain fail-closed. Classify only corrupt handoff reads as recoverable and keep startup handoff corruption from blocking coordinator readiness. Lore-id: issue-4457-optional-handoff-boundary Constraint: wake persistence failures propagate Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator Codex bridge, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Optional corrupt handoffs are recoverable coordinator context; their filesystem read failures are not. Expose typed parse/schema corruption while propagating non-ENOENT storage errors and scope startup recovery to that type. Lore-id: issue-4457-handoff-io-boundary Constraint: wake persistence I/O remains fail-closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Malformed optional handoff names are corruption of optional context, not a coordinator readiness failure. Classify them as typed handoff corruption and prove terminal event preservation. Lore-id: issue-4457-handoff-filename-recovery Constraint: optional handoff corruption cannot block events Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Wake persistence failures must fail the initiating coordinator operation without serializing independent Codex threads. Await queued durability work after releasing the event append queue, and skip/log typed corrupt optional handoff entries. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-publication-order Constraint: wake persistence failures remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Wake durability diagnostics and cleanup must not hide primary publication, write, or sync failures. Aggregate concurrent cleanup/close/diagnostic failures and retain non-ENOENT handoff directory errors. Lore-id: issue-4457-compounded-durability Constraint: primary filesystem failure remains observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Wake recovery and directory barrier failures must retain their primary causes. Aggregate recovery failures, clear rejected tails after callers observe them, and skip typed optional handoff corruption in auto-binding. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-failure-causes Constraint: coordinator I/O causes remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator bridge, durability, and MCP server suites
Readiness cleanup and same-thread wake recovery must not hide durability failures or block later work. Aggregate readiness cleanup failures and continue new wake tails after callers observe a prior rejection. Lore-id: issue-4457-readiness-wake-recovery Constraint: primary durability failures remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, durability, sidecar, and MCP server suites
Readiness retries must reestablish parent durability, and diagnostic writes must not hide coordinator handoff failures. Barrier matching readiness markers and aggregate primary/diagnostic failures. Lore-id: issue-4457-readiness-diagnostic-causes Constraint: primary durability failures remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, MCP server, durability, and sidecar suites
Typed optional handoff corruption and its diagnostic failure must remain observable together. Aggregate callback diagnostics and prove raced readiness markers re-barrier their parent. Lore-id: issue-4457-optional-handoff-diagnostics Constraint: durability causes remain observable Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Wake-event corruption is durable coordinator state, not optional handoff context. Classify malformed wake records separately so startup replay propagates their corruption. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-record-corruption Constraint: corrupt wake records fail closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Startup readiness must validate every durable wake record, even when optional handoffs are corrupt or absent. Require canonical wake filenames and record identities before replay. Lore-id: issue-4457-orphan-wake-validation Constraint: wake record corruption fails closed Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Durable wake records must have the exact filename update and acknowledgement reconstruct. Reject numeric aliases and filename-record identity drift before startup replay. Lore-id: issue-4457-canonical-wake-filenames Constraint: wake record paths are canonical durable identity Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: straightforward Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Wake update keys must match their canonical durable filename identity. Cover leading-zero aliases so acknowledgements cannot normalize a noncanonical key. Lore-id: issue-4457-wake-key-alias Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: coordinator bridge, handoff, durability, MCP server, and sidecar suites
Windows surfaces the unsupported directory-handle fsync as either EPERM or EACCES depending on the runtime (#4457's own reproduction shows errno 13 EACCES), and the established broker directory-barrier implementations (sdk/broker/session-index.ts, sdk/broker/discovery.ts) already accept both at open and sync stages. The new coordinator classifier tolerated only EPERM, so a Windows runtime reporting EACCES still failed every mutating coordinator tool after the file was already durably written. Lore-id: 9f9582db7746 Constraint: only Windows directory-handle barriers may relax; file fsync and all non-Windows errors stay fail-closed Tested: bun test coordinator-durability + coordinator-mcp-server + session-state-sidecar + codex-bridge/handoff (270 pass) Tested: bun --cwd=packages/coding-agent run check (biome + tsc clean) Supersedes: 6b905d9 Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: trivial
Dev #4573 wired session-manager to the edit renderer for bounded edit-snapshot receipts, which pulled renderer/streaming (and the hashline barrel cycle) into session-manager's module-init order. Any test importing the edit barrel or web-scrapers first then hit 'ReferenceError: Cannot access END_PATCH_MARKER before initialization' (analogous handleYouTube/handleDockerHub TDZ), failing dev shards 1-4/7-8 repo-wide. Move the three pure receipt helpers into node-builtin-only leaf edit/snapshot-receipt.ts; renderer re-exports unchanged; session-manager imports the leaf. Discriminating regression test pins barrel-first initialization. Lore-id: issue-4593-edit-tdz Constraint: no behavior change - renderer re-export is the same public surface Tested: apply-patch-adverserial, safe-summary, package-managers-2, youtube, edit-result-persistence-bounding, session-manager suites, ci-dev-affected selftests, coordinator 18-suite set Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean-revert
Three races in chat-daemon-session-reconnect failed loaded CI shards (and ~1-in-6 local runs): the ambiguous-acknowledgement test asserted exactly two provider attempts after a fixed 50ms sleep while the retry rides wall-clock-scheduled lease recovery; the retry-budget and rolled-generation tests asserted exact replay-request arrays whose retry-tail entries race the cursor acknowledgement of the first publication (sinceSeq 0 vs 1). Settles now poll the observable (attempt ledger, sixth replay request, post count) to the wide bound the test timeout already allows, and the racy array assertions assert the race-free invariants instead: count, generations, initial cursor from zero, rebuilt attachment resuming from the acknowledged cursor. No-double-publication semantics unchanged. Lore-id: issue-4596-chat-daemon-flake Constraint: test-only change; production semantics untouched Tested: 45 consecutive green file-level runs (was ~1-in-6 failing); targeted ambiguous-ack test 6/6 Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean-revert
081239e to
042e8ba
Compare
Freshness reconstruction onto dev
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
2 participants
Closes #4457
Closes #4593
Coordinator MCP durable writes preserve file fsync, atomic publication, directory ancestry, canonical projection integrity, journal integrity, and strict error propagation. Windows tolerates only unsupported directory-handle EPERM/EACCES/ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUPP/EINVAL, matching the established broker directory-barrier pattern (
sdk/broker/session-index.ts,sdk/broker/discovery.ts— both accept EPERM+EACCES on win32 at open and sync stages); file fsync, rename, and all non-Windows failures remain fail-closed.Fix-forward included (dev-red unblock, #4593): dev #4573 wired
session-managerto import the edit renderer for bounded edit-snapshot receipts, pullingrenderer→streaming→hashline(and itshashline↔editbarrel cycle) into session-manager's module-init order. Result: repo-wide TDZ failures (ReferenceError: Cannot access 'END_PATCH_MARKER' before initialization, analogoushandleYouTube/handleDockerHub) failing dev shards 1-4/7-8 atcd51365cand this PR's shard-1 at96e64f718. Verified inherited, not branch-induced: pristine base804314081passes the identical invocations; pristine dev87b540d2(the #4573 merge) fails them; bisect pins9a97601e/1e3e781bgreen →87b540d2red. Fix: the three pure receipt helpers move to node-builtin-only leafedit/snapshot-receipt.ts;rendererre-exports unchanged;session-managerimports the leaf. Discriminating regression testedit-snapshot-receipt-leaf-init.test.tspins barrel-first init.Rebased onto current dev
d332b7890(dev advance since804314081f: #4584, #4587, #4573, #4557, #4583 — none touch coordinator-mcp; sole overlap is CHANGELOG entry position; canonical digest unchanged because #4583 delta is disjoint): the same 35 coordinator commits plus the 1 fix-forward commit replay with zero conflicts; all 11 coordinator source/test files byte-identical to the reviewed treece73f2747f. Prior heads:96e64f7181(shard-1 failed on the inherited TDZ),ce73f2747f,458a13c854,0aef0fb7a7,791df2861e.Review lineage: probepark APPROVED at
ce73f2747f(review 4943913192, fresh-worktree 270-test verification) — stale; fresh exact-head review required at this head.Local verification at exact head
042e8ba9f(base274766ad6, 37 commits):scripts/ci-dev-affected.test.ts(90 tests): 0 failbun --cwd=packages/coding-agent run check(biome + tsc): exit 0 (11 warnings pre-exist in fix(session): bound apply_patch transcript metadata #4573's test file)gajae.pr-review-verdict.v1 needs-human sha256:628835594eca108e598f6268e81002c889be1e6aaf04c117d3a841582fe69b2b reviewer:human reviewer-id:pending evidence:exact-head-042e8ba9f-current-dev-274766ad6-37commits-coordinator-byte-identical-tdz-plus-flake-fixes-verified-fresh-non-author-review-pending
—
[repo owner's gaebal-gajae (clawdbot) 🦞]