Skip to content

Upgrade to Sphinx 9 - #3276

Draft
bartfeenstra wants to merge 1 commit into
0.5.xfrom
sphinx-9
Draft

Upgrade to Sphinx 9#3276
bartfeenstra wants to merge 1 commit into
0.5.xfrom
sphinx-9

Conversation

@bartfeenstra

@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra commented Dec 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This fixes #4388

@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra added this to the 0.5.0 milestone Dec 3, 2025
@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code labels Dec 3, 2025
@bartfeenstra
bartfeenstra force-pushed the sphinx-9 branch 2 times, most recently from 1a23008 to e118b32 Compare January 25, 2026 12:28
@bartfeenstra

bartfeenstra commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author 

    ### # @todo
    ### _make_props_from_imported_object
    ### sphinx.ext.autodoc._dynamic._loader._make_props_from_imported_object()
    ### OR
    ### _best_object_type_for_member()
    ###
    ### Also debug Sphinx builds to see why it thinks our localized attributes are not a problem but ServiceManager is.
    ###
    ###
    # Work around a bug in Sphinx where MethodDocumenter.can_document_member would erroneously consider our descriptors
    # as methods resulting in errors being raised because said descriptors are not callable and do not have a signature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

0.5.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade to Sphinx 9

1 participant

@bartfeenstra