my solution of the problem !#41
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ayoubioussoufa <Ayoubioussoufa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayoubioussoufa <Ayoubioussoufa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayoubioussoufa <Ayoubioussoufa@gmail.com>
5914c0a to
d8d94f9
Compare
|
First why would they agree to give up their cups and second you said so who manages this process? |
|
Guests would agree to give up their cups because the randomized process ensures fairness and equal opportunity for everyone. Understanding this system, rational guests are incentivized to follow the rules to maximize their chances of drinking water rather than risk a deadlock. Initially, I thought the host might manage the process. However, upon revisiting the rule:
I realized that the host cannot be involved beyond their designated role. To address this, the elimination process is designed to be entirely decentralized and managed by the guests themselves using a blockchain-based randomization mechanism. Each guest directly interacts with the blockchain system to submit their inputs (heads or tails). The blockchain algorithm processes these inputs to determine the outcome transparently and impartially. This ensures that the host strictly adheres to their role of pouring water and verifying the rules are followed. They do not participate in or manage the elimination process, fully respecting the constraints outlined in the problem. |
No description provided.