Skip to content

feat(content-manager): add non-mutating rules plan - #181

Draft
AAH20 wants to merge 1 commit into
chronicle:mainfrom
AAH20:codex/rules-plan-evidence
Draft

feat(content-manager): add non-mutating rules plan#181
AAH20 wants to merge 1 commit into
chronicle:mainfrom
AAH20:codex/rules-plan-evidence

Conversation

@AAH20

@AAH20 AAH20 commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • add a read-only rules plan command that compares local rule content and deployment settings with Google SecOps
  • emit deterministic JSON describing rule creation, revision, and state changes, with a canonical SHA-256 plan digest
  • include remote revision identifiers for change-review evidence while excluding rule text and Google Cloud resource names
  • document stdout and file-output workflows

Why

Rule updates currently move directly from local configuration to mutation APIs. Operators need a reviewable preview before changing production detections, especially in CI/CD and change-control workflows. This adds that preview without changing the existing update path.

The plan can be retained as machine-readable evidence, compared across runs, or reviewed before a separate update invocation.

Safety

The planner only loads local rules and reads remote rules. A regression test replaces the create, revision-update, and deployment-update functions and verifies that none are called.

Plan output deliberately omits rule source text and Google Cloud resource names.

Testing

  • PYTHONPATH=tools/content_manager pytest -q tools/content_manager/content_manager
  • 39 tests passed
  • python -m py_compile tools/content_manager/content_manager/rules.py tools/content_manager/content_manager/__main__.py tools/content_manager/content_manager/test_rules.py
  • python -m content_manager rules --help

Signed-off-by: aah20 <aah20@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-cla

google-cla Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant