Skip to content

Conversation

@felangel
Copy link
Contributor

@felangel felangel commented Apr 4, 2025

Status

READY

Description

  • fix(dart_frog): add default handler for disallowed http methods
    • This fixes a bug where previously requests made to a dart frog server with arbitrary http methods would result in a 500 (internal server error). With the changes in the PR, that case would result in a 405 (method not allowed)

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced HTTP request handling to clearly flag unsupported methods, resulting in a descriptive "Method Not Allowed" (405) response when an invalid HTTP method is used.

@felangel felangel requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2025 22:04
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce explicit error handling for unsupported HTTP methods. A new exception class, UnsupportedHttpMethodException, is added to signal when an unsupported method is encountered in the Request class. In the Router class, a new parameter methodNotAllowedHandler and related logic (including a default handler and response class) are implemented to return a 405 status on such cases. Additionally, new test cases validate the behavior for both request and router components when handling unsupported HTTP methods.

Changes

File(s) Change summary
packages/dart_frog/lib/.../request.dart and packages/dart_frog/lib/.../router.dart Added error handling for unsupported HTTP methods. In request.dart, introduced UnsupportedHttpMethodException. In router.dart, added methodNotAllowedHandler, _defaultMethodNotAllowed, and _MethodNotAllowedResponse.
packages/dart_frog/test/.../request_test.dart and packages/dart_frog/test/.../router_test.dart Added tests to verify that unsupported HTTP methods throw the new exception and trigger the 405 response via the router’s method not allowed handler, including repeated invocations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Router
    participant Request
    participant Handler as methodNotAllowedHandler

    Client->>Router: Send HTTP request (unsupported method)
    Router->>Request: Retrieve method property
    Request-->>Router: Throw UnsupportedHttpMethodException
    Router->>Handler: Invoke methodNotAllowedHandler
    Handler-->>Router: Return 405 Method Not Allowed response
    Router->>Client: Send 405 response
Loading

Poem

Hop, hop, I’m a coding rabbit on the run,
Skipping past bugs under the bright coding sun.
Unsupported methods now cause no dismay,
With custom exceptions leading the way.
My ears perk up at each fixed 405 call,
A joyful code hop for one and for all!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acc6829 and c29cadc.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/dart_frog/lib/src/request.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/dart_frog/lib/src/router.dart (5 hunks)
  • packages/dart_frog/test/src/request_test.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/dart_frog/test/src/router_test.dart (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: pana / build
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/dart_frog/test/src/request_test.dart (1)

47-59: Great test coverage for the new functionality!

This test verifies that the Request class properly throws UnsupportedHttpMethodException when an unsupported HTTP method is encountered, with the correct error message listing all supported methods.

packages/dart_frog/lib/src/request.dart (2)

3-18: Well-structured exception class with good documentation

The UnsupportedHttpMethodException implementation is clean and provides a detailed error message that will help developers understand what methods are supported.


132-135: Good implementation of method verification

The use of firstWhere with an orElse parameter is an elegant way to implement this validation, throwing the appropriate exception when an unsupported HTTP method is encountered.

packages/dart_frog/test/src/router_test.dart (2)

94-100: Excellent test case for unsupported HTTP methods

This test confirms that requests with unsupported HTTP methods (like 'FOO') correctly return a 405 Method Not Allowed status with the appropriate message.


455-473: Complete test coverage for the methodNotAllowed response

These tests thoroughly validate the behavior of the methodNotAllowed response, ensuring it can be reused and properly modified with copyWith().

packages/dart_frog/lib/src/router.dart (5)

39-46: Good API design with backward compatibility

Adding the optional methodNotAllowedHandler parameter with a default implementation maintains backward compatibility while providing flexibility for custom handlers.


176-184: Proper exception handling for unsupported methods

This implementation correctly catches the UnsupportedHttpMethodException and invokes the appropriate handler, improving the framework's error handling capabilities.


227-229: Simple and effective default handler

The default handler returns a sentinel response, following the same pattern as the _defaultNotFound handler for consistency.


237-243: Well-documented static field

The documentation for the methodNotAllowed static field clearly explains its purpose and usage, which will help developers understand the API.


268-289: Complete implementation of the method not allowed response

The _MethodNotAllowedResponse class follows the same pattern as _RouteNotFoundResponse, ensuring consistent behavior for method not allowed responses.

While there's some code duplication between this and _RouteNotFoundResponse, it maintains a clear separation of concerns that makes the code more maintainable.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wolfenrain wolfenrain merged commit 189cceb into dart-frog-dev:main Apr 7, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants