Skip to content

Auto-generated fix using Ultracite Cloud#339

Open
ghost wants to merge 6 commits intostagingfrom
ultracite/fix-I0N22Zr3w2k-04O9wfMPs
Open

Auto-generated fix using Ultracite Cloud#339
ghost wants to merge 6 commits intostagingfrom
ultracite/fix-I0N22Zr3w2k-04O9wfMPs

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 11, 2026

Formatting and Code Style Improvements

Consistent indentation and formatting adjustments to improve code readability.

  • Fixed indentation alignment for the chartType union type definition
  • Removed trailing commas in function return types and array literals for consistency
  • Standardized formatting throughout the file for better maintainability

This PR was automatically created by Ultracite Cloud

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 11, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
dashboard Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 11, 2026 6:02am
2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
databuddy-links Skipped Skipped Mar 11, 2026 6:02am
documentation Skipped Skipped Mar 11, 2026 6:02am

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – databuddy-links March 11, 2026 06:01 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – documentation March 11, 2026 06:01 Inactive
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ izadoesdev
❌ Ultracite


Ultracite seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Greptile Summary

This PR contains purely cosmetic, formatting-only changes to use-dynamic-dasharray.ts generated by Ultracite Cloud. There are no logic, type, or behavioural modifications.

  • Fixed indentation of the chartType union type values to align one level deeper than the property declaration (correct TypeScript style).
  • Adjusted indentation of the function return-type tuple to match the opening [.
  • Removed trailing commas from several callback arguments and array literals (Array.from, .find, .join, and the useCallback dependency array).

All changes are safe, stylistically consistent, and carry no functional risk.

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge — it is a formatting-only change with zero logic modifications.
  • Every diff hunk is a whitespace/indentation adjustment or a trailing-comma removal. No executable logic was altered, no types changed, and the hook's return value and behaviour are identical before and after.
  • No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
apps/dashboard/components/charts/use-dynamic-dasharray.ts Pure formatting-only changes: fixed indentation for the chartType union type, adjusted return-type tuple indentation, and removed trailing commas in several callback/array expressions. No logic changes.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["useDynamicDasharray(props)"] --> B["useState: lineDasharrays"]
    A --> C["useCallback: DasharrayCalculator"]
    C --> D["Iterate chartLines"]
    D --> E["calculatePathLength(points)"]
    E --> F{chartType is step variant?}
    F -- Yes --> G["total + dx + dy (Manhattan)"]
    F -- No --> H["total + sqrt(dx²+dy²) (Euclidean)"]
    G --> I["Compute dashedLength & solidLength"]
    H --> I
    I --> J["Build targetDashPattern repetitions"]
    J --> K["Construct finalDasharray string"]
    K --> L{newLineDasharrays changed?}
    L -- Yes --> M["setTimeout → setLineDasharrays"]
    L -- No --> N["Skip state update"]
    C --> O["return [DasharrayCalculator, lineDasharrays]"]
Loading

Last reviewed commit: d8e6408

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants