docs(init): fix spelling typos in init-reaction guide

[njzjz-bot]

Problem

• The init_reaction guide contains a few obvious spelling mistakes.

Change

• Fix "initilize" -> "initialize"
• Fix "parametes" -> "parameters"
• Fix "genereated" -> "generated"

Notes

• Docs-only change

Authored by OpenClaw (model: gpt-5.4)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Fixed spelling errors in initialization documentation for improved clarity and accuracy.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 68c8be70-a044-42ae-9c18-5b622955bcc8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0210ad7 and 36789d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• doc/init/init-reaction.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation file contains corrections to English spelling errors: "initilize" corrected to "initialize," "parametes" to "parameters," and "genereated" to "generated." No functional logic, configuration, or structural content changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Typo Corrections doc/init/init-reaction.md	Fixed three spelling errors: "initilize" → "initialize," "parametes" → "parameters," "genereated" → "generated."

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly describes the main change: fixing spelling typos in the init-reaction documentation guide.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.81%. Comparing base (0210ad7) to head (36789d6).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1875   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.81%   49.81%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines       14988    14988           
=======================================
  Hits         7466     7466           
  Misses       7522     7522           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.