Skip to content

Conversation

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Collaborator

@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ commented Dec 9, 2025

(created using eb --new-pr)
See EESSI/software-layer#1317 (comment)

@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ added the new label Dec 9, 2025
@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ changed the title fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie (2023a) fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (2023a) Dec 9, 2025
@boegel boegel added bug fix aarch64 Related to Arm 64-bit (aarch64) and removed change labels Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the change label Dec 9, 2025
@boegel boegel removed the change label Dec 9, 2025
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (5.2.0?) milestone Dec 9, 2025
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 9, 2025

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (total: 1 min 2 secs) (2 easyconfigs in total)
aarch64-neoverse-v1-node1.int.aws-rocky88-202310.eessi.io - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/0e4415d71defecdc18e9ac6dc4956b5f for a full test report.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 2023b 2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains 2025a issues & PRs related to 2025a common toolchains change labels Dec 9, 2025
@PetrKralCZ PetrKralCZ changed the title fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (2023a) fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (2023a and newer) Dec 9, 2025
@boegel boegel changed the title fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (2023a and newer) fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (GCC/12.3.0 toolchain, and newer) Dec 9, 2025
@boegel boegel changed the title fix compatibility with Arm for Bowtie2 (GCC/12.3.0 toolchain, and newer) fix compatibility with Arm for recent Bowtie2 easyconfigs by adding simde header-only build dependency Dec 9, 2025
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 9, 2025

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in total)
aarch64-neoverse-v1-node1.int.aws-rocky88-202310.eessi.io - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_v1), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/9f8d7c5e372c1c5c351d84f6257d1ce2 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel removed the change label Dec 9, 2025
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 9, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=24791 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_24791 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9065

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3634384351 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (total: 9 mins 32 secs) (9 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/237b7a4e6d7ff17015d119f43001c5fe for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 10, 2025

Going in, thanks @PetrKralCZ!

@boegel boegel merged commit 686ed52 into easybuilders:develop Dec 10, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2023a 2023b 2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains 2025a issues & PRs related to 2025a common toolchains aarch64 Related to Arm 64-bit (aarch64) bug fix new

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants