[yselkowitz]

Complete historical lists can already be viewed above this; the main point of comparison is to see what has changed, and including (the vast majority) what has not just makes this much longer than it needs to be.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Updates
  • Package comparisons now show only items unique to each selected date; packages present on both dates are no longer displayed.
  • The comparison row count now reflects the longer list of unique items, rather than including shared packages.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 5da3f766-ae33-4219-87cf-041bfc070494

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb11c86 and b5a1d92.

Files selected for processing: 1

• templates/view_overview.html

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The overview comparison now lists only packages unique to Date A and Date B. It no longer computes or displays shared packages, and it sizes rows from the longer exclusive list.

Changes: Date comparison display

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Exclusive comparison results templates/view_overview.html	The template removes the shared-package calculation, table cell, and column header. The row count uses the longer of the Date A and Date B exclusive lists.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Feature

Possibly related PRs

• fedora-eln/content-resolver#133: Adds the historical package comparison and its shared-package results, which this change modifies.

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to b5a1d

The comparison change cleanly removes shared entries without an identified merge-blocking risk.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly describes the main change: removing the “In Both” comparison results.
Docstring Coverage		No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[andrewnaessens]

Reviewed changes, all 4 references to inBoth have been removed. Changes look good.