[material_ui, cupertino_ui] Migrate dartpad TODOs to <callout-box>

[dkwingsmt]

Background

Dartdoc 9.0.7 added support for <callout-box> (what we used to call the blue container).

What's changed

This PR migrates all should-be Dartpad instances in API docs to <callout-box>. This is what it looks like:

This PR also disables unintended_html_in_doc_comment because <callout-box> is not recognized by the linter for now. An issue has been filed: dart-lang/sdk#63782

Pre-Review Checklist

• I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
• I read the AI contribution guidelines and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools.
• I read the Tree Hygiene page, which explains my responsibilities.
• I read and followed the relevant style guides and ran the auto-formatter.
• I signed the CLA.
• The title of the PR starts with the name of the package surrounded by square brackets, e.g. [shared_preferences]
• I linked to at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
• I followed the version and CHANGELOG instructions, using semantic versioning and the repository CHANGELOG style, or I have commented below to indicate which documented exception this PR falls under¹.
• I updated/added any relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
• I added new tests to check the change I am making, or I have commented below to indicate which test exemption this PR falls under¹.
• All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the gemini-code-assist bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.

Footnotes

1. Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩²

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

[dkwingsmt]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request wraps example documentation blocks in tags across multiple Cupertino and Material UI components, and disables the unintended_html_in_doc_comment linter rule. Feedback on the changes highlights that placing regular // TODO comments inside contiguous /// doc comment blocks terminates the block, causing dartdoc to ignore the preceding documentation. The reviewer suggests moving these // TODO comments outside of the doc comment blocks to ensure correct API documentation generation.

[dkwingsmt]

FYI this PR is now ready for review.

[Piinks]

Are the packages in this repo using Dartdoc 9.0.7?

LGTM