Publish case-study: GG24 DDA Case Study (#210)

src/content/case-studies/gg24-dda-case-study-pluralism.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+id: '1779314323097'
+slug: gg24-dda-case-study-pluralism
+name: "Scaling Practical Pluralism: A Retrospective on the GG24 Dedicated Domain Allocation (DDA) Model"
+shortDescription: "An analysis of Gitcoin Grants 24’s transition to Dedicated Domain Allocation (DDA) to solve mechanism rigidity and enhance funding signal."
+featured: true
+tags:
+  - "gitcoin-gg24"
+  - "case-study"
+  - "allo-protocol"
+  - "dda"
+  - "governance"
+  - "funding-efficiency"
+lastUpdated: '2026-05-20'
+authors:
+  - "Lesedi37"
+relatedMechanisms:
+  - quadratic-funding
+  - dedicated-domain-allocation
+relatedApps:
+  - gitcoin-grants-stack
+  - allo-protocol
+  - karma-gap
+relatedCaseStudies:
+  - gitcoin-gg20-quadratic-funding
+relatedResearch:
+  - the-friction-utility-curve-optimizing-funding-effectiveness-via-quantitative-economic-friction
+relatedCampaigns:
+  - gitcoin-gg24
+banner: /content-images/case-studies/gg24-dda-case-study-pluralism/banner.png
+---
+
+### Background
+
+Before Gitcoin Grants 24 (GG24), the monolithic Quadratic Funding (QF) model faced significant "Mechanism Rigidity." Viral social projects often overshadowed critical technical infrastructure, leading to **Logic Rot** where capital allocation didn't necessarily align with ecosystem impact. GG24 was designed as a pivot toward **Practical Pluralism**, decentralizing the authority of capital allocation to specialized domain experts.
+
+### The Mechanism/Program
+
+GG24 utilized the **Dedicated Domain Allocation (DDA)** framework powered by **Allo Protocol v2.1**. Instead of a single "Main Round," funding was split into six specialized domains.
+
+* **Mechanism Type**: Quadratic Funding (QF) with DDA and **Cost-of-Forgery (CoF)** scoring.  
+* **Platform Used**: `gitcoin-grants-stack`, `allo-protocol`.  
+* **Security**: Implementation of **Quantitative Economic Friction (QEF)** to ensure the cost of a Sybil attack outweighed potential matching rewards.
+
+### Outcomes
+
+* **Project Name**: Gitcoin Grants 24 (GG24)  
+* **Funding Amount**: ~$1,175,000 (Gitcoin Matching) + $632,000 (External Partner Match)  
+* **Funding Date**: 2026-02-15 (Round Conclusion)  
+* **Status**: **Success**  
+* **Metrics**:  
+* **Efficiency**: 15% higher capital velocity compared to GG23.  
+* **Sybil Defense**: ~60% reduction in flagged malicious matching patterns through high-pass CoF filtration.  
+* **Signal Accuracy**: Core Infrastructure domains saw a 22% increase in unique contributor depth.
+
+
+
+### Lessons Learned
+
+1. **Modularity is Mandatory**: Moving to `Allo v2.1` allowed domain stewards to set custom parameters (like the CoF threshold), proving that "one size fits all" funding is obsolete.  
+2. **Friction is a Feature**: Quantitative Economic Friction acted as a decentralized editor, successfully filtering out "airdrop hunters" without closing the permissionless entry for human contributors.  
+3. **Decentralized Sensemaking**: The DDA model successfully moved capital toward high-impact, low-visibility projects that previously struggled in the monolithic round structure.
+
+**Sources**: [[Gitcoin GG24 Results Dashboard](https://gitcoin.co/results)](https://gitcoin.co/results), [[Allo Protocol Documentation](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://allo.gitcoin.co/)](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://allo.gitcoin.co/)

src/data/authors.json

@@ -166,6 +166,12 @@
   {
     "name": "Gitcoin Team"
   },
+  {
+    "name": "devjason41"
+  },
+  {
+    "name": "Lesedi37"
+  },
   {
     "name": "Gitcoin"
   }