Remove all npm scripts in favour of nx targets#2445
Remove all npm scripts in favour of nx targets#2445rfontanarosa wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the project's script execution strategy by migrating all existing Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request migrates all npm scripts from package.json files into nx targets. This is a great move for standardizing script execution within the monorepo. The migration is mostly well-executed, but I've found a few areas for improvement. Specifically, I've pointed out a potential issue with a hardcoded placeholder in a production deployment script, a missing task dependency that could lead to running tests on stale code, and a minor redundancy in a build script. Addressing these points will make the new setup more robust and maintainable.
Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2445 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 58.97% 58.97%
=======================================
Files 111 111
Lines 2747 2747
Branches 408 408
=======================================
Hits 1620 1620
Misses 1065 1065
Partials 62 62 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
closes #2341