Conversation
* kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos * kernelctf: add CVE-2025-38248_cos
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2025-38248_cos/exploit/cos-121-18867.294.25/exploit.c
Show resolved
Hide resolved
artmetla
left a comment
artmetla
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Varde7918 Please have a look at the comments and introduce necessary changes.
artmetla
left a comment
artmetla
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @Varde7918. Please have another looks at exploit code and check if some extra features of kernelXDK could be utilised
pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2025-38248_cos/exploit/cos-121-18867.294.25/exploit.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2025-38248_cos/exploit/cos-121-18867.294.25/exploit.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2025-38248_cos/exploit/cos-121-18867.294.25/exploit.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }); | ||
| kxdb.AddTarget(st); | ||
|
|
||
| auto target = kxdb.GetTarget("kernelctf", "cos-121-18867.294.25"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You should autodetect target. In this case it'll run only on cos-121-18867.294.25 as you've added Target st("kernelctf", "cos-121-18867.294.25"); but it's by design.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
done. not sure why ci vuln_verify failed
koczkatamas
added
vuln-verify
recheck
3 participants
No description provided.