Zig implementation#2
Open
Didas-git wants to merge 30 commits into
Open
Conversation
This is very dirty and lacks support for parsing vectors as arrays, only intended as a POC
brianferri
requested changes
Mar 4, 2026
Member
brianferri
left a comment
brianferri
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please also update the related tests. All tests ran by zig build test should pass before merging
brianferri
reviewed
Mar 4, 2026
| }, | ||
| .@"struct" => |struct_info| { | ||
| // Packed structs are encoded as their backing integer and treated as bitfields | ||
| // TODO: Maybe it could be a good idea to have a Meta type to indicate bitfields |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It'd be worth opening an issue to track this proposal
I used marksman to generate it
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Zig implementation working on 0.16.x
There are some data types that are not yet implemented (and porbably wont be implemneted in js for now as well) so they are properly marked on the readme