Skip to content

Add Stop That Shit - #370

Open
lennney wants to merge 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
lennney:agent/stop-that-shit
Open

Add Stop That Shit#370
lennney wants to merge 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
lennney:agent/stop-that-shit

Conversation

@lennney

@lennney lennney commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Plugin submission

Add Stop That Shit to the Development & Workflow section.

The source repository runs the required HOL Plugin Scanner workflow on main and the full project CI matrix passes.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 17, 2026 14:26

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Contribution gate passed. @lennney, no action is required.

The previous contribution-gate failure is resolved. View the latest sweep.

@lennney

lennney commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The linked source repository is public and the required scanner workflow is present on main. This close/reopen only retriggers the contribution validator after its initial workflow-directory read returned a 404.

@lennney lennney closed this Aug 17, 2026
@lennney lennney reopened this Aug 17, 2026
@lennney

lennney commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the automated gate. The linked source repository is public and the required scanner workflow is present on main:

The contribution sweep classified this PR as source repository or workflow directory was not found twice, while the public GitHub contents endpoint currently returns HTTP 200 for the same workflow directory. Could you please rerun the gate or check whether the validator's repository token is returning a cross-repository 404 for public personal repositories?

中文说明:源仓库是公开的,main 上已有符合要求的 scanner workflow,项目侧验证和扫描均通过。门禁连续两次把公开 workflow 目录判为不存在,可能是 validator 使用仓库令牌读取外部个人仓库时的权限/404 问题,麻烦维护者重新运行或检查该读取逻辑。

@kantorcodes kantorcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update before merge: the current alphabetical validator reports a new inversion because appears before . Move Stop That Shit before Superloopy in Development & Workflow, rebase onto current main, and rerun the validator/checks.

@kantorcodes kantorcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correction to my previous review note: the current alphabetical validator reports a new inversion because Superloopy appears before Stop That Shit. Move Stop That Shit before Superloopy in Development & Workflow, rebase onto current main, and rerun the validator and checks.

@kantorcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The source scanner is present and reports 95/100 with 0 critical/high findings, but the branch is based on stale Codex main e7077743 and the current contribution history still reports the alphabetical inversion noted earlier (Stop That Shit must sort before Superloopy). Please move the entry, rebase onto current main e01550e0, rerun the alphabetical/contribution checks, and request re-review.

@kantorcodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The source scanner remains green (95/100, 0 critical/high findings), but the alphabetical issue is still outstanding: Stop That Shit must sort before Superloopy in Development & Workflow. This branch also targets stale Codex catalog main e7077743 while current main is 70983d15. Please move the entry, rebase onto current main, rerun alphabetical/contribution checks, and request re-review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants