test ci

[high-cloud]

test ci

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a minor formatting change by adding a blank line in models/deepseek/v4/decode_fwd.py before the MoE scope block. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 20652cd0-58bf-4c07-a972-e82537a726ff

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A blank line separates the attention_csa and moe calls in the DeepSeek v4 decode forward path. No logic, control flow, or arguments changed.

Changes

Decode formatting cleanup

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Separate CSA attention and MoE calls models/deepseek/v4/decode_fwd.py	Adds a blank line after the attention_csa invocation.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Poem

I’m a bunny with a tidy little line,
Between attention and MoE, things align.
No tensors hopped, no logic grew,
Just whitespace fresh and clean anew!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is generic and does not describe the actual formatting-only change.	Use a concise title that mentions the formatting change in models/deepseek/v4/decode_fwd.py.
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description is also generic and adds no meaningful detail about the change.	Replace it with a brief description of the formatting-only update in decode_fwd.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}