chore: bootstrap docs/exec-plans/ with Phase 1 foundation plan#1781
chore: bootstrap docs/exec-plans/ with Phase 1 foundation plan#17810xDEnYO wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Adds the exec-plans directory and TEMPLATE.md, plus the Phase 1 Foundation plan that closes the gaps identified in the recent agent-readiness audit (10/16 → 15/16). This PR ships only the bootstrap. ARCHITECTURE.md and the trim of .agents/rules/002-architecture.md land in a follow-up commit on the same branch (see task 1.1 in the plan). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR introduces a standardized agent planning framework by adding a reusable plan template and the concrete Phase 1 implementation roadmap. The template establishes metadata, goal/approach, task tracking, decision logging, and operational guidelines. The Phase 1 plan then instantiates this template to specify the Contracts Automation Foundation with four sequenced PR workstreams covering documentation enforcement, CI checks, file-size budgets, and structural tests. ChangesPhase 1 Plan and Governance
🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsStopped waiting for pipeline failures after 30000ms. One of your pipelines takes longer than our 30000ms fetch window to run, so review may not consider pipeline-failure results for inline comments if any failures occurred after the fetch window. Increase the timeout if you want to wait longer or run a Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md (1)
185-195: 💤 Low valueJSON schema reference serves no functional purpose.
Line 187 includes
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", but no actual schema definition or validation is shown. This reference is decorative and might mislead readers into thinking schema validation is performed.Options to address this
Option 1: Remove the schema reference if validation isn't implemented:
{ - "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "exemptions": [Option 2: Keep it as documentation of intent (current approach is fine if schema validation might be added later).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md` around lines 185 - 195, The JSON snippet contains a decorative "$schema" key but no validation is performed; either remove the "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" entry from the JSON block, or explicitly annotate the block (e.g., an adjacent sentence or HTML comment) stating that the schema reference is informational only and no schema validation is executed, so readers are not misled; locate the JSON block by the "$schema" key and update it accordingly.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md`:
- Line 43: Replace every incorrect reference of
`.agents/rules/002-architecture.md` with the correct path
`.cursor/rules/002-architecture.mdc` throughout the document: update the task
description, the subtask reference, the subtask title/description, the git add
command in task 1.4, and the done criteria so the plan points to the existing
file and the git command succeeds.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md`:
- Around line 185-195: The JSON snippet contains a decorative "$schema" key but
no validation is performed; either remove the "$schema":
"https://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" entry from the JSON block, or
explicitly annotate the block (e.g., an adjacent sentence or HTML comment)
stating that the schema reference is informational only and no schema validation
is executed, so readers are not misled; locate the JSON block by the "$schema"
key and update it accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0c9e8a62-b044-4024-9f09-d1d342c5f736
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/exec-plans/TEMPLATE.mddocs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.mddocs/exec-plans/completed/.gitkeep
Adds task 1.4 (docs/CONVENTIONS.md - rule-anchor index) and task 1.5 (docs/references/deployment-state.md - Mongo deploy store reference) to PR-1 scope. The original 4-PR scope only moved the audit score 10 -> 14, not the 10 -> 15 I optimistically claimed in the first draft. These two documentation additions close the remaining points: - Doc Health "anti-patterns documented" -> CONVENTIONS.md - Agent Workflow "in-repo deploy artifact" -> deployment-state.md (the artifact already exists in MongoDB; only discoverability was missing) Both are pure docs, ~2 hours each, no code risk. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
This PR bootstraps the
docs/exec-plans/directory and lands the Phase 1 Foundation plan — the first of four PRs that take the contracts repo from agent-readiness audit 10 / 16 → 15 / 16.docs/exec-plans/TEMPLATE.md— template for future plansdocs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md— Phase 1 plan (this PR is task 1.4 of that plan)docs/exec-plans/completed/.gitkeep— placeholder so the dir shipsThe plan itself is the PR description — see
docs/exec-plans/active/phase-1-foundation.md.What this enables
A single, agent-readable state file per multi-step initiative. Subsequent automation work (
sc-verify-source,sc-verify-bytecode,sc-deploy,sc-security-audit) creates and updates exec plans rather than scattering state across Linear, Slack, and PR comments.What this PR is NOT
ARCHITECTURE.mdwork (lands as a follow-up commit on this same branch — see task 1.1 in the plan)Test plan
bun lint:fixpasses (markdown-only diff)Out of scope / follow-ups
ARCHITECTURE.mdwith Mermaid domain map (same branch, next commit).agents/rules/002-architecture.mdto a 10-line stub pointing atARCHITECTURE.mdOpen questions for reviewers
Captured in the plan's Open Questions section. Recommended answers are in the plan; one-line "all defaults OK" reply works.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code